Chile for mexicans

Chile for Mexicans
By Diego Velázquez


Michel Bachelet's visit to our country is pointedly to the Mexican case. Chile has been a role model in the political and economic experiences in Latin America. Its stabilizing capitalism, its consolidated democracy and austere state, have been examples of which took lesson in academia and little in practice.

Some years ago Carlos Castillo Peraza could be seen that in the political transition process of this nation, seemed to meet the stage for slow and prolonged Mexican transition could advance. The stage of agreements and pacts between the military dictatorship after exhausting antagonistic political groups stood out. Admission consensus, strangely, allowed political and economic reforms that have regularly organized problems.

Mexico set aside covenants. Chile is admired for its economic stability and development that has generated; however, there is something more meaningful than the immunity of numbers. The pact is allowing actors are radical conspirators, offers the chance of being included and, if not, at least respected. The left is integrated with the power elite in this country and is proof of this.

Arthur Lafontaine thinks that Chile is the model par excellence of modernity Conservative. Canutos and a traditionalist Catholics make up front while defending the family, globalization and consumption. Although inequality persists and advances a new wave of violence against human rights, the Chilean model brought benefits to most of its population. What was the secret of your formula?

Augusto Pinochet, soldier whose main attribute was betraying the political leader Salvador Allende and implement the massive disappearance of opponents did not admit legal judgment on his responsibility during the dictatorship; however, it was inevitable his presence in court of history where the verdict has already been given. Did you serve something? Perhaps. The military and the oligarchy of the country have to live with the unbearable truth.

Spain and Chile were positive prototypes of democratic transitions in the twentieth century. Elites managed to mature and compromise. They did not bury or forget their past, they learned to live with it and built forward serious. Opus Dei, Canutos, landowners, military and other theologians of prosperity hardly return to exterminate indigenous, university and peasants; what does it mean to live together peacefully. The health of the neoliberal model in the South American country depends on the strength that has the political system: a system of competitive parties, alternation, political intelligence, transparency and democratic practices. Virtues that the Motherland has begun to mislead.

Mexican elites aspire to modernity Conservative like Chile. But they have failed to mature and understand that the work begins with serious and formal agreements. Covenant does not mean Conspiracy. The agreements to plunder the country, protect the greed of banks and construction companies, celebrate the execrable behavior of party inner circles, obscure the management of public assets, with impunity assassinate opponents, etc., they are incomparable with the Chilean reconciliation or Spanish.

The experience of pacts in these countries not necessarily mean forgetfulness and forgiveness. Coexistence and tolerance of different political beliefs does not prevent terror, tragedy and sadness of the story. Roberto Bolanos, an extraordinary and unbearable Chile as Mistral or Neruda, is rescued by Javier Marias in this perspective the agreement. Who is reconciled with life becomes a hero. Who kills he is not seen as a loser or his opponent. Hero is the one who supports the existence and its past. If Mexico requires democracy, development and stability, it is because the time has come where the country demands heroes.

Mexico is not the Chilean context. The right has had considerable momentum but not enough to be considered a problem. They are most concerned about the order but lack conviction, consistency and honesty. The PRI, PAN and PVEM are mainly responsible for blackmailing party-in the country. The decomposition of the left seems limitless. Who and what could agree in Mexico? Democratic devolution started in 2012 reduces the possibilities of a career as Chile, but does not involve cancellation.
http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2015/08/20/chile-para-los-mexicanos/
- See more at: http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2015/08/20/chile-para-los-mexicanos/#sthash.OWaTRh7w.dpuf

The commission of the consortium

The commissioner of the consortium
By Diego Velázquez


http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2015/08/07/el-comisionista-del-consorcio/

The last debate between the contenders for the leadership of the PAN, revealed the profound changes that have had the representative of the national conservative party. While our country needs a modern, liberal and honest right; however, the dialogue between Ricardo Anaya and  Javier Corral lets us see that we are light years to get it.

At least one hundred years have passed of an era that served Manuel Gomez Morin to reflect and had the courage to correct their past circumstances. The essay "1915" that he wrote in 1927 shows giant influence he had that peculiar year to build the intellectual heritage. 1915 was one of the most terrible moments of the Mexican Revolution, civil war, epidemics, violence and abuse wich configurate the Mexico Bronco in full force.

Severe and complicated towards the native of Batopilas convene a so-called generation of responsible men who through legitimate, brave and honest action they propose to reduce the pain and tragedy of the Mexican state situation. How little we have changed! Every day the misery of the country and its institutions questioned the authority of democracy.

1915 seems our constant and does not arise, anywhere, the generation whose attitude move souls. The project of Manuel Gomez Morin and Efrain Gonzalez Luna has been liquidated over time. The civilian party changed for a franchise that competes in practices with the Ecologist Green Party of Mexico. Timing and dispossession define leadership in National Action. Anaya just lacks its Patilú or Montana, as appropriate.

The debate showed the deep crisis in identity, legality, values ​​and militancy that exists in the PAN. Ricardo Anaya is proof of the inconsistency that haunts this political institute. Their praises to the turncoat, mass militancy, neoliberalism assimilate technocrats Harvard. But the amazing thing was that Anaya thinks Corral and Lopez Obrador are the same. Although their curriculum portraying him as a political scientist at UNAM, tell almost Corral is a Chairo Panista did talk like that mirreyes Cumbres Institute graduates or, at least, of those who listen to the great political scientist Fernanda Familiar. Anaya just forgot to say that social movements to take to the streets of Reforma in Mexico City, they must be exterminated to match your alter ego. Certainly jumps like when phenomena like the Narvarte occur.

Anaya evaded responding to the Consortium membership. The pointing of Corral is significant because it puts on the table the debate to the organization responsible for the PAN and Mexican debacle. The Consortium is the Orchestra, the Organization, the Yunque. That Catholic Mafia pact with anyone to keep their privileges. Not human, no ideas, no values, their god is money and so they understand so well with PRI and corruption.

Anaya permanence in the CEN of PAN make inevitable some things for that political institution. For example, the presidential candidate who as governor likes to have among its employees "wet dogs". The consortium already agreed and construction is underway of a Mexican religious state. Lately, secularism has been challenged and no authority penalizes such illegal action. What is not understood is the reason that all these fundamentalist demonstrations in favor of marriage and family, do not end up accepting contraception and abortion. If you think like Anaya and Calderon, to be consistent, should understand as it is easier to remove the activists, teachers, thinkers, academics, homosexuals, peasants and indigenous people from the uterus and avoid many repressions to promote their businesses and sponsors.

The Mexican right is overly tropical. Anaya allusion to the Costa Rican confessionalism allows you to see the Venezuelan, Colombian level but above all Haitian political views.

Modernity, in all its dimensions, remains the great slope of Mexico. Gomez Morin wrote 1915 to leave at that time, not to stay there forever and wants PRIAN.

- See more at: http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2015/08/07/el-comisionista-del-consorcio/#sthash.SxpflJS5.dpuf