The North American Black Century

The North American Black Century

April 12, 2020

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2020/04/12/La-Centuria-Negra-Norteamericana

A few decades ago, when asked who would win the space race among the superpowers, it was mockingly answered that the Nazi scientists that North America had were better than the Nazi scientists that the Soviet Union had. Thus, what seemed like a joke showed a crude truth: that the Nazis, like the Mexicans, paraphrasing Chavela Vargas, are born where they want to.

In the United States, Operations Paperclip and Blue were showing that the allies kept Nazi supplies of any kind to restrain the USSR. What is the consequence of liberal capitalist democracy having coexisted with the Nazis? For some authors such as Noam Chomsky and an important critical intellectual current, democracy in the world is nothing more than a facade that guards the totalitarianism of the North American Empire.

For several decades, a large group of historians and social scientists have highlighted the fact of collaboration between anti-Semites, Nazis and the American oligarchy. Beyond the political pragmatism that justifies the projection of the United States as the winner of the Cold War and the only superpower in a dangerously multipolar world, the American political class hardly considers the boomerang effect of these actions. But what if it is true that the IV Reich was built from the CIA?

The indication of terrorism to Russian nationalist groups shows that the invisible American government follows the ideas of Alfred Rosenberg and Adolfo Hitler. The accusation against the Russian Imperial Movement is an unnecessary intervention in the government of Vladimir Putin and in the way the Eurasian model changes the world order; after all, Eurasia is a logical and inexorable process.

In its interventionist practice, the CIA has funded terrorist groups like the MIR around the world. But with everything and its dangerousness, the MIR would already like to achieve the economic, political and social power that groups of the Mexican extreme right reached. It seems that the Nazis are only legitimate when the United States sponsors them.

At this time, when the world seems to depend on the course taken by the COVID-19 epidemic, the future of the world order can no longer be seen. Bacteriological wars are the consequence of uncontrolled terrorism but fostered by US geopolitical competition.

While theorists like Huntington recommended North American isolationism, others believe that it still makes sense to balkanize Eastern Europe, again, to contain Russia and then dynamite the world so that the United States retains its hegemony. In this sense, while the ideas of Brezinski and Rosenberg are being followed foolishly and a mysterious virus has us on the brink of extinction, it is urgent that North America contain itself and control its Nazis and those of its closest neighbors, such as Mexico.

Our Nazis, because there are also Mexican Nazis, also followers of the Fourth Political Theory, the white supremacy and Christianity of Salvador Borrego, intransigent integral; Feminazis and followers of Prosperity Theology are about to create a stampede of Latin American migrants to the United States that will significantly affect their governance.

The Latin American Nazis, and particularly the Mexicans, have a more serious virus than COVID-19: rage called anti-communism, in the name of which, in actions more serious than those of the MIR, destroy the entire public order of the Mexican State. Anti-communist rage, now turned into an identity movement, will generate in the backyard of the United States, and in the south of that country, a zombie war that has already begun. North America must allow the evolution of the Eurasian continent and be limited to Latin America. The Covid-19, like the Anthrax and the AH1N1, are samples of the human and imperialist vulnerability.

The end of the Cristero War?

The end of the Cristero War?
June 27, 2019

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2019/06/27/%C2%BFEl-fin-de-la-Guerra-Cristera

In 1929 the Agreements that brought peace to the conflict between the Catholic Church and Mexico were generated through the intervention of the United States of America and some of the world's main anti-Communist agents of the Holy See such as Edmund Walsh. The conflicts, unfortunately, continued. Still in 1937, Mexico, the Spanish Republic and the Soviet Union were besieged by Catholic nationalism that the Holy See implemented in several regions. The intransigent religious integralism was transformed into a confrontation with the Mexican Revolution, the social, indigenous and peasant movements.

            Some years ago, historians such as Paolo Valvo and Fernando M. González came to the conclusion that certain bishops deceived the Holy See to involve it in the conflict and to acquire international pressure so that the Mexican government not only gave in to the demands of the conservative groups but, above all, stop the actions of social justice that had been sustained in the revolutionary demands. The objective was successful in the short, medium and long term. From the Agreements, then in 1941, during the Cold War and, above all, in the neoliberal era, it has gone from a diplomatic negotiation to a frank concordat where the republic is subordinated to an imperialism.

            Despite the interpretation that historians make of the evidence, it is necessary to enrich the analysis with other sources and studies. It is true that local groups can manipulate things and distort information for an institution as large as the Catholic Church. However, given the geopolitical, historical, economic, social and informative power that Catholicism has; it does not lend itself to manipulation. It is incredible that, on the one hand, the Catholic Church is considered one of the pillars against the fight against world communism and, on the other hand, it is said to be deceived by some bishops located in our country.

            The Spanish Republic was destroyed by the intervention of the Holy See in support of fascism, a similar pattern would develop in the USSR at the turn of the twentieth century. The regime of the Mexican Revolution saved the skin, but had to make multiple concessions and only kept the adjective against the counterrevolutionary demands to which it was subjected.

The Cristero War was an unfortunate event that should not have happened and that was caused by the ecclesiastical hierarchy attached to the Holy See. A perpetuation of the civil war that seems endless and prevents building a national project and develop an institutional scaffolding to promote well-being and well being among Mexicans. The remembrance of the agreements with the Holy See should be indicative that Mexico is subject to two imperialisms and that, in the face of such a situation, things are complicated.

              Edmund Walsh was one of the Jesuit architects who infiltrated the USSR and shaped the anticommunism of the Cold War. Faced with such characters, can you believe that Mexicans cheat the Vatican State?

               The anticlericalism of the first half of the twentieth century in Mexico and Latin America is justified. The political groups that tried to modernize and change the social structure of their countries, did not imagine that the Old Regime had such strong and powerful allies as the Holy See. General Porfirio Diaz's own government had to turn into a clerical dictatorship in the face of the impossibility of exercising a government without the pacts with the religious institution.

            General Plutarco Elías Calles and Licenciado Benito Juárez are patriots who show us the way in which a government has to emancipate itself to combat this form of interventionism that does not cease or change over the years. In the case of Mexico, the agreements of 1929 are the sign of a pact between institutions that would end up subjecting Mexico and Mexicans to the control of intransigent integral Catholics. The military, agraristas and citizens who decided to confront the Holy See in those difficult days, must also be admired as heroes.

            The space of Mexico was always ambitioned by several powers and the Cristero War was the conflict where the United States was also subjected to this tutoring of Imperialist Political Catholicism. The importance of remembering the imposition of these Agreements for the Mexican State, includes understanding one of the ideological inheritances of this coexistence with the Holy See: anti-communism.

            This form of political thought authorized the survival of the most retrograde and anti-modern forms of the Mexican and Latin American social structure. Anti-communism, the legacy of such agreements, is maintained today with such radical ways as if only yesterday Lenin had come to power. Many groups of intransigent integral Catholicism forget that they co-governed with the PRI much more than thirty years neoliberal. The ninety years that fulfill the agreements of 1929 are the period of understanding between North America, the revolutionary Family and the Holy See to take over the country. In all these years only the Mexicans have lost, they have given time, sweat, blood, tears and resources for the dispute of these hegemonic powers that will never dedicate a few minutes of their mercy.

            Andrés Manuel López Obrador is treated by the groups of the Mexican extreme right as if he were Tomás Garrido Canabal. Sometimes I should answer them as if I were. It is not like that, AMLO defines himself as a God-fearing man and there is no doubt about the ecumenical Christianity he practices, that is, to the detriment of the country's progressive liberal-ecological groups.

            However, the agnostic-nihilistic-secular thought is misunderstood everywhere. The gods do not go to sea or space, they return in many ways and continue to nourish people's lives.

            Despite the fact that religious representatives are held responsible for serious infamies, society needs metaphysical elements to continue living and to procure, as far as possible, its existence. However irrational religions may be, they manifest as control institutions that favor social order. And order, as an instinct for conservation, is necessary for human survival.

            I hope that the far right also understood that the Welfare State and the distribution of wealth are elements that favor the conservation of humanity.

            Anti-communism was the flag that was used in the last ninety years by those who plundered the country and subjected it to the imperialisms of the West. Power has always been the goal of your strategy. They never cared about the young man of the Gospels or the Tonantzin of December twelve.

            The agreements and the reform of Article 130 must be seen as a product of imperialism that subjects Mexico and that is responsible for the serious social conditions that we keep.

Rusophobia, anti-Semitism and Mexico

Rusophobia, anti-Semitism and Mexico

http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2018/02/05/rusofobia-antisemitismo-y-mexico/

By Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

What is the reason that the Mexican extreme right seeks to resuscitate the spirit of Canoa and 1968 in the current elections? By accusing Russia of supporting Andrés Manuel López Obrador, are they trying to revive anti-communism, Judeophobia and violence against public universities?

Communism, Jews and the Russian Orthodox Church are elements that provoke conflict for Catholics. The Jewish-Illustrated conspiracy is emphasized, which acquires force when the Pontifical States are lost in 1870, and the Catholic Church blames the enemies Freemasons, enlightened, Jews, communists, liberals, secularizers and scientists. In the great conspiracy against the Church, all the enemies of Catholicism fit and are confused. The fundamentalism and Catholic fundamentalism would then be justified to reconfigure the greatness of the Church. The Holy See built the attacks on Russia from the moment when that country was a space for the survival of Bundism - a socialist Jewish movement - the affirmation of Orthodox Christianity, communism and Islam. One of the geopolitical projects for the protection of the Vatican State was the "Intemarium". The Intermarium was, and is, an anti-Jewish, Russophobic and ultraconservative Catholic project. When the Russian Revolution emerged, this strategy was implemented so that the intransigent integral Catholicism infiltrated governments, universities, civil society, etc., with the purpose of rooting Catholic secret organizations and controlling the status quo.

The animosity of Poland to Russia has infected the Ibero-American countries; nevertheless, the true rejection of Russia is not from Poland but from the Holy See that observes in Russia one of its main historical enemies. The Mexican far right has enunciated its historical attachment to the geopolitical project called Intermarium that coordinated the arrival of Karol Wojtyla as Bishop of Rome.

A few days ago, Poland enacted a law that sanctions the interpretation or indication that can be made between that nation and Nazi collaborationism. The fact constitutes a useless legislature with respect to historical evidences and facts. However; Beyond the Polish responsibility in the Holocaust, the interesting thing is to highlight the way in which anti-Semitism is used as a justification for Russophobia.

Recently, Russia has begun to take a leading role in the definition of global and European geopolitics. Since Vladimir Putin came to power there has been a synchronization between Russia's internal and external policy that seeks to affirm its vital space and zone of influence. The long period of the political group of Vladimir Putin has solved the crises of the USSR, the conflicts with the border areas and has maintained a zone of influence in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Does Russia intend to constitute the Central State of the Baltic Slavic civilization? in the XXI century? How is Vladimir Putin's leadership to lead an elite that coordinates a semi-authoritarian democracy? Is Russia's development a risk for the West? Are there areas of influence for Russia in other civilizations? What is the reason for the emergence of Baltic Slavic identity in the post-communist era? What role does Russia play in the current multipolar scenario? Has it become a democratic, capitalist and liberal nation? Can it return to socialism to promote a new hegemony? What kind of power is Russia now?

Samuel Huntington gives Russia the treatment of a country whose modernity is frustrated or torn; at least, at the end of the 20th century, that's what it seemed. Russia has a Russian modernity, Baltic Slavic, which with greater certainty is attached and which, each time, has a resounding success. Russia supported, a little over a decade, the capitalist democratic neoliberal model; however, he abandoned it and has found himself again with an autochthonous experience of growth and development. This was the world of the future to which Huntington's hypotheses referred: 1) civilizations will develop internally in a radical process of differentiation with the West and 2) the West has to redefine its civilizing values ​​to stop its own decline in a global context where there are more and more actors and competitors.

Although the concept of clash of civilizations has a serious and bizarre impression, the most important thing that the hypotheses of the North American geopolitical singular have is the approach of the challenge that the culture or western civilization presents once the world of the cold war is over. While it is true that cultural differences have always been there, the exhaustion of the bipolar scheme generated many civilizations and central states of the same, emerge with greater strength and sense of geopolitical territoriality.

This is the case of Russia, only with attachment to its cultural identity and nationalism has managed to be reborn after almost collapsing with the end of the USSR. Russia has a global role that competes with the United States and the West in particular, its recovery has defeated the image of a poor, authoritarian and weak country. At the turn of the 21st century, Russia rejected Westernization and returned to the path of its own identity. The stage has followed, partially, the picture that appeared Huntington. Russia can not be omitted from international politics in Eastern Europe, Asia and the Middle East. It can not be said that he has regained the power that the USSR had; but it is not a minor actor in current geopolitics either. Its foreign policy coincides more and more with its national interest and is prepared militarily and professionally.

The recent leadership of Russia, China and India have robbed the United States of importance in global control. However, they do not seek the total armed conflict and, much less, the conquest of the world. The multipolar equilibrium generates a cold war where more actors intervene that, certainly, adopt the cautious and latent patterns of contention. Armed conflicts are represented in areas where diplomacy is concluded and the interests of the powers determine the use of force.

Modernizing globalization is no longer the heritage of Western culture. The West is in crisis for a blind neoliberalism represented in the Culture of Davos and the cultural metastasis that generates its consumerism. The abandonment of the United States to Mexico implies the opportunity for identity recovery and social reengineering. The Mexican neoliberals, the extreme right and the national bourgeoisie are condemned by the old capitalist superpower; they are ineffective, corrupt, murderous, retrograde and cretinous.

Should Mexico continue under the tutelage of the Holy See and projects such as the Intermarium? Should Mexico fear Russia? Of course not.

A large part of the macro-projects and strategic policies that our country has lost, owe their failure to the belief that you can only work with the allies of Catholic Christendom. There are the results: impunity, corruption, poverty and underdevelopment. Russia, and the world, are opportunities that globalization and modernity offer to our environment. It is a pity that El Yunque continues believing that Mexicans are programmed in code "Canoa 1968". The neoliberal Hispanic Catholic oligarchy can no longer hide its parasitism, the attacks on Russia are proof of its lamentable intellectual and moral capacity: the Americans no longer want them or of servitude. The closure of the North American president to our country, must be the impulse to look for new allies, technologies, infrastructure, markets, exchanges; in short, the world.

Mexico must fear the consecration of the Anvil that the Holy See promotes in the PRIANRD and, unfortunately, also in MORENA.