2018: End of the Güeritocracy (Hispanocracy)?

2018: End of the Güeritocracy (Hispanocracy)?

May 28, 2018

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2018/05/28/2018-%C2%BFFin-de-la-G%C3%BCeritocracia

The world of show business affirmed: "the rich also cry". The mediated biography of Luis Miguel - one of the most important Ibero-American musical phenomena - evidences the sacrifice imposed by a social structure based on the caste system, resentment and envy, this model is the güeritocracy (Hispanocracy). Following the demographic study of INEGI on social mobility, the consequences of the inherited discrimination of the colonial period could be measured. During the Viceroyalty, having Spanish and white ancestry was synonymous with hegemony; while, the rest of the social castes, were condemned to the dispute by the hierarchy in an order that has remained stony. Little has changed the situation since then.

The Güeritocracy in Mexico can be a symbolic construction based on the reflections that this study generated. However, the social culture recognizes the rules of this structure. Due to the processes of colonization and conquest, a racial division developed in Mexico that links Catholic Hispanic whiteness with the best social strata and means of production while oppressing those who distance themselves from this social imaginary. It is in this sense that the "güeritos"(blondie), regardless of their abilities or belonging to aristocratic families, generally obtain positions of power. Each caste assumes the give and take that its role implies, there are historical adjustments but the extremes and the scale do not change. The counter-reformist regime subsists in architecture, beliefs and history.

The lack of a true liberal revolution in Mexico hurts generationally all social classes. Almost no one is saved, except who knows how to slide through social cleavages through tartufism, corruption and violence, as did the father of El Sol and the families that make up the oligarchy that owns the country.

France and England, after 1600 years of Constantine - Union between Religion and Politics - generated revolutionary paths to show that heaven is gained from here. In this way, the State appears as a lesser evil that can attenuate the valley of tears implied by existence; Thus, while the City of God endures in the limbo of the infinite, daily needs demand that people reconcile their interests, fears and passions. The fundamental myth of Christianity states that secularization is fundamental for transcendence, however, few religions have understood it and the West causes the disappearance of humanity by imbricating the Protestant and capitalist ethic.

The government of the State helps men to be saved from themselves. Contractualism and representation of social capital are unique tools to agree on the perpetuation of the species. This is the lesson that Mexico has not wanted to implement; State in our country is synonymous with protection of criminals, unfair trial, pedophilia, femicide, narco-politics, prostitution, etc. Constantineity must be limited in terms of human well-being.

The candidates for the presidency of the republic have expressed the urgency to reconstitute the Mexican State, it would be illogical if they did not say so! However, the differences in the way of implementing the political system have guided the political preferences of the people. Indeed, as the Güerito editorialists have acknowledged, there is a morenocracy that is outraged by the geopolitics. And as?! Will Luis Miguel know if his mother's experience was just? That Constantineity that claimed the right to fame to the musical Sun, is an absolute in Mexico. The kiriarcado caciquil of the Mexican revolution agreed with the uncompromising integral Catholicism, creating an anticommunist narrative, exclusive, decomposed, anti-Mexican that expresses well the PRIANRD.

In the second debate among the aspirants to the presidency, organized by the INE, the true political intention of the different candidates was notorious: a right that does not know what the State is for, oscillates between repressive violence, false nationalism and corruption Constantine; a PRI that is aware of the enormous diplomatic, political and economic effort necessary to rebuild relations with a country that -simply- no longer supports Mexico. But in the face of this, Meade does not assume the historical responsibility of his party and fails to establish how he will displace the corrupt kyriarchy that appointed him.

The offer of Morena, on the other hand, is limited when it proposes combat to the corruption and Welfare State; undoubtedly the speech is bland, but it is the most authentic against the Failed State in which the ungovernability and the oligarchy placed us. That has been enough for his candidate to benefit from the enormous indignation that the country is experiencing, because his proposals fight the pillars of historical Güeritocracy.

Güeritocracy that makes women a Marcela Bastieri or Malinche. Mentality that assumes the exclusion, racism and xenophobia to consider nationalism only the masculine-Hispanic manly Mexicanness. Rhetoric that considers the original peoples - browns-morenos-native- worse than the Nazis; However, he conceals that German National Socialism was based on Catholicism. Rude and haughty attitude to the different -like Anaya against the Peje or Margarita against Marichuy-, but submissive and cordial with the big capitals. Kyriarchy caciquil catholic that has expelled millions of Mexicans, which sustains its economy in exploitation, monopoly, drug trafficking and corruption. Technocracy region five, capable of producing only Mirreyes and Slaves. Constantineity unable to accept that the historical Christ, like the Virgin of Guadalupe, is moreno.

The National Regeneration Movement can reach the presidency of Mexico in the next elections, but the end of the geopolitical democracy does not depend on it; the country must change to look for its place in the concert of the countries and civilizations. The separation of the Constantineity is urgent so that the kiriarcado Hispanic caciquil catholic-the güeritocracy- finishes. In Mexico all fit and no one should escape the responsibility of integrating into a better future, the perverse system of colonial castes can not last a lifetime. Not even the United States has it and, for that reason, the US government demands that Mexico end its colonial order.

It is difficult to establish if a historical break in Mexico is approaching, even though it is time to leave the Middle Ages. Social mobility must not depend on the color of the skin, the caste system has to end, and the güeritocracy can no longer be our characteristic as a society.

Moreno; but with a free soul

Moreno; but with a free soul
By Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

2018 will be a caste war. It is not the first nor the last occasion that this happens in a country like Mexico. Miscegenation is a myth that seeks to hide our differences; although these have always been there, distinguishing the country from each one. The polarization that has generated the injustice of the economic structure is shown in the evidence of INEGI regarding the racism that persists in the national culture. The castes of the colonial era are still there for the pride of the Creoles and resentment of others. The dark face has been the most discredited everywhere. The Virgin of Guadalupe is tanned skin; but the owners of the country are white. The morenos die in torrents due to the economic lack, violence, poverty and exclusion caused by white masters. It would be interesting to ask David Páramo in the opposite direction. What is the ratio of whites to morenos in terms of deaths by the Mexican Failed State?

Leo Zuckerman wrote a severe criticism of the comments made by Andrés Manuel López Obrador against the technocrats and the Creole -and now Lebanese- bourgeoisie that usurp the economic power in this country. Zuckerman claims to be an Eric Zemmour region four. However, Mexico is not France and the dark ones are not Muslim immigrants. The dark ones are in our country, in our land, with our cosmovision and syncretism. The terrorists are the Catholic catacomb gachupines who control the high clergy in Mexico and -they do- waste no time in conspiring against the Mexican homeland and putting themselves at the service of the Holy See or any other foreign bidder.

The attacks that society has received with brown skin -Mexicans mestizos-; those are serious. They go beyond the shame that Zuckerman points out and defend people like David Páramo. Germany has assumed its condemnation for the Nazism that inspired its behavior in the first half of the 20th century. When will a similar phenomenon occur with the Spanish Monarchy and the Holy See? Quite the opposite. The ideas of characters such as the infamous communicator José Antonio Sánchez show us the medioeval character of hispanism, its values, its schools even if they are private, they are certified as modern and they teach technocracy; they do not instruct them that the world has already changed, that's why only Mirreyes come out who, even with the disguise of neoliberals, are really technodinos. In the same sense, the Vatican State represents the most retrograde institution as far as modern thought is concerned.

The armies of General Francisco Villa and Emiliano Zapata, in their time of revolutionary splendor, expelled, murdered and raped hundreds of Spaniards in Mexico. Some of their actions claimed the massacre of the Alhóndiga de Granaditas that inspired in a decisive way the Mexican emancipation of the Spanish yoke. What's missing, Villa and Zapata! How urgent is the consciousness of Mexico's independence, once again, at the cry of Cura Miguel Hidalgo!

The workers of the organizations dedicated to the crime of drug trafficking are people with mostly dark skin. The brown people have been sacrificed with abundance in the name of a business that enriches a government and Creole oligarchy that have no reservations in controlling the transfer of drugs in the continent. They are specialists in never showing their faces, in hiding and turning things around, in committing self-attacks, they are doctors of cowardice. Fighting manly, as it has been demanded even Mario Bergoglio, is a disability of his character. The experts in dividing society, in separating families, are intransigent integral Catholics. Tartufos that always act under the tutelage of the conspiratorial skirt. Their companies are responsible for creating a narcoculture for the masses; but none of his descendants has the courage to truly become a Capo at the head of a criminal or military group commanding soldiers. The Creoles live by getting mestizos-natives in uniform to kill mestizos-Indians without uniforms; this practice was established since his arrival.

General Francisco Villa's common sense led him to consider that Spaniards could never love Mexico. For that reason he expelled them from the northwest of the country while he could and confiscated their properties, factories, haciendas and capitals to support those who had been squeezed, mistreated and raped by them. There are the testimonies of Salvador Novo and Salvador Abascal or, at least, Carlos Alvear Acevedo to confirm it. The generals Emiliano Zapata and Lázaro Cárdenas will continue this action expropriating thousands of Gachupinas haciendas and motivating the formation of agrarian battalions that would defend the morenos and the ejido lands.

Once again, the PRI has turned its back on the trajectory of the Mexican revolution that General Plutarco Elías Calles condensed when he introduced revolutionary nationalism in the country. The reactionary unity for the PRI has already been agreed with the PAN. Now the PRI has a legionary-synarchist candidate as at the time they were Miguel de la Madrid and Gustavo Díaz Ordaz. Yunques and pseudonazis with whom Zuckerman should be more concerned to coincide.

It is necessary to reflect on the fear that represents the loss of a certain order. What order is it feared to lose in the country? Eric Zemmour blames the neoliberals for the suicide that lives in France. Does not the same thing happen in Mexico? López Obrador maintains a deep erosion due to the contradictory image between love and hate that he represents. It happens that his personality escapes the aristocratic hypocrisy that substitutes frankness for delicate manners. It is preferable to oppose the traitorous vocation of Creole elites that do not end up defining their affection for the people and the land where we are. Of course, it is urgent to be critically aware in order to see how the disaster that corrupt neoliberals have made will deepen and the indignant - although coarse - verb is more useful to rebuild the homeland. Mexico is already in ruins and Zuckerman does not want to see it. López Obrador is far from being a Zapata or Villa; but that does not mean that some characters -like those warlords-, in fact, are already in the fight against the Post-Porfirian Army.

Who has caused the disorder and anarchy in this country? Who has caused the foreign intervention? Who are the leaders of the pederasty and white slave that controlled Mario Marín? Does not Leo Zuckerman know the work of Salvador Borrego? With everything and its technocratic whiteness Itamita, Think Zuckerman that is in the creole elite of Mexico? So, are brown men more dangerous than gachupines? There is the INEGI survey that describes the color, inequality and contrast of Mexican clevages.

The outcasts who abjured their origin remain as servants and lackeys of a social structure that in no way remedies the crisis of the country; there they do if they consider servility to be a solution. Slavery does not take away the place of birth, skin color or religion; These elements only disappear when a nation becomes modern, when the Reformation-Revolution becomes a real historical break with the Catholic Hispanic Baroque.