Showing posts with label Fascismo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fascismo. Show all posts

Monday, September 29, 2025

The wounded american right

 The Wounded American Right

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero




The assassination of Charlie Kirk, a singular and prominent figure of Trumpism, highlights the deep polarization that corrodes American society.


This tragic event falls within a context of social anomie, where responsibility apparently falls on the behavior of populist progressivism.


In the wake of this event, the debate between conservatism and progressivism intensifies.


The MAGA movement presents itself as the victim of an attack, arguing that it embodies order, stability, and Christian nationalism, a perception that seems to gain legitimacy.


Progressivism, for its part, is perceived as a movement approaching a "culture of death," where iconoclasm becomes a central value and destruction is an end in itself.


Under this lens, any society that adopts it would be on the verge of cultural suicide.


The problem with progressivism, seen from this perspective, lies in its linear view of history and progress.


The upcoming Trumpist conventions will be revived by this event, boosting right-wing activism both in the United States and throughout the Western world.


Kirk's death has resonated even in Latin America, where, despite the racism inherent in the MAGA movement, this event has been viewed in a strange way, almost as a kind of martyrdom.


In this context, progressivism faces the challenge of articulating effective public policies that counter the exacerbated voluntarism of libertarianism and postmodernism.


In a geopolitical world where the West seems to be waging a battle against itself, while non-Western civilizations thrive on conservative values, it is almost inevitable that right-wing positions will gain ground, especially in countries like the United States.


President Trump has found in Kirk's death a perfect pretext to reinforce his isolationist and exceptionalist policies.


It will continue to pursue the MAGA agenda without compromising its nationalist and Christian beliefs, as figures like Charlie Kirk have become martyrs to its ideology.


This tragic event represents a direct threat to progressive populist movements, which seem to be losing their direction and the ability to offer functional solutions to society.


Disillusioned, people will rally, as if in a chain reaction, to politicians who promise order, stability, employment, economic growth, and security.


Perhaps the time has come to contain modernity and, as Samuel Huntington once suggested in Who Are We?, regenerate Western culture.


In this context, progressive populist movements lose their bearings and become a pretext for aggressive geopolitics by conservative nations.


For Mexico and leftist governments in Latin America, Kirk's death heralds a hardening of Trumpism on crucial issues such as migration, drug trafficking, and governance.


Ultimately, this murder highlights the supposed essence of cultural post-Marxism in universities and its advancement at any cost, an argument that will undoubtedly be exploited by his political adversaries.

Saturday, October 31, 2020

They are Roman, don´t try to change them (Morris West)

 They are Roman, don't try to change them (Morris West)… ..

31/10/2020

Diego Martin Velázquez Caballero



https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2020/11/01/Son-romanos-no-intente-cambiarlos-Morris-West


It is undoubtedly a welcome that Chile has come out en masse to send a clear message to the Catholic, Creole and military oligarchy, about their unbearable presence and arbitrariness. Of course, these messages are not always understood. Precisely, in this South American country, an elite was characterized that, in the name of God, decided to overthrow the first democratically elected socialist ruler.


To the memory comes, with a hint of bitterness and disagreement, an academic participation abruptly intervened by a Chilean socialist bookseller who, in the face of the debate raised by the Spanish political scientist Juan Linz regarding the presidential-parliamentary duo and its relationship with democracy, pointed out that in 1973 Chile needed weapons and civility. From a distance, it is an unbearable truth.


Arturo Fontaine and an intellectual gang that accompanies him from one of the main Catholic political science centers, proposed, a few years ago, that Chile should retake the 1925 constitution that was suspended at the time of the coup. That size is the measure that the historical speed of Catholic nationalisms propose for the making of political changes. How good is the Chilean 1925! Latin America is still struggling in the labyrinth of the Middle Ages.


However, there is another Chile that aspires to autonomy, liberalism, progress and equality. The country is lavish in wine and literature, for this reason, Roberto Bolaños appears opposite Fontaine. If literature is the record of democratic change, it will be necessary to rush the gringo sociologists so that in the next text on modern religious anthropology, they include the Chileans who advance between the moon and Barcelona. Could it be that free Chileans can only be out of this world? For Catholic nationalists, yes.


Chile was the center of convergence between the United States and the Holy See. Augusto Pinochet proposed the country as the center of Conservative Modernity where neoliberalism and Catholic anti-communism shaped the social fabric. It was the model of the liberal Catholic dictatorship where humble people were subdued, controlled, murdered and exploited, by an oligarchy with bombastic fascist morals. The Chilean democratic transition has hidden many crimes and abuses of the right so that the left came to govern, it followed the Spanish model of forgetfulness, forgiveness and tolerance to the ever-current abuse of the powerful. That is why so much is expected of Chile, for changes to proceed in a different way. The future is beyond banishing Pinochet and John Paul II from history, it implies building a free nation.


It is not enough to support a constitution for the 21st century more than for 1925. The message of the old Chilean socialist bookseller is fundamental. The people must value and pay the cost of their freedom. If the Chilean people do not supervise and demand a constitution tailored to their historical circumstances, Chile will accumulate yet another experience in all the silly republics of Latin American letters. A constitution is a chimera against imperialism. Neither the United States nor the Holy See will stop intervening and protecting their interests alongside businessmen and aristocratic landowners.


Chile and Bolivia have demonstrated convincingly to demand their rights, they have shown the cynicism and immorality of geopolitical imperialism. However, the western theological right encourages the manifestation of liberal and nationalist collectives to destroy them in the possible post-pandemic future. That the people and the history of Chile make no mistake

Thursday, April 19, 2018

The Mexican right in the twentieth century. Agony, transformation and survival




The Mexican right in the twentieth century. Agony, transformation and survival
Downloadable Book

48. The Mexican Right in the Twentieth Century Agony, Transformation and Survival.
Xóchitl Patricia Campos López, Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero (coordinators)
BUAP
PROFMEX
Montiel & Soriano Editors
257 p.
ISBN 978-607-7512-77-6
Year 2017
The political ideologies are distinguished by displaying nuances that, although they let us know their relativism, allow us to understand the extension and intensity of the categories. The ideological orientation known as the right approaches conservative, religious, order, reactionary, aristocratic, xenophobic, excluding, etc. criteria. But what is the future of the right? How do you think the right? How does it speak? What is its relationship with economic groups? Has it established geopolitical links? What have been its historical manifestations? contemporary ?, Who can be considered right?

The historical speed of a country determines the meaning of its social structure, which makes the Mexican right singular; but necessary reconsideration. Globalization, modernity and the political transition have generated events that force us to reinterpret the right-wing pendulum. The world economic order folds to the right, then, has the Mexican reaction been synchronized or desynchronized? Observing how much the Mexican right has changed will make it possible to formulate a map appropriate to the circumstances.

The text that you, friendly reader, has in your hands, is the product of reflections emerged from the Academic Body "Multidisciplinary Studies of Politics and Law" (BUAPCA-281), and that found echo in academics from different institutions. The objective of the work is to inform, appropriately, of the historical change, the construction of networks and to formulate new indicators to understand the impact and validity of the right.
script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js">