Colonialist Geopolitics

 Colonialist Geopolitics

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

Donald Trump behaves like Kaiser Wilhelm II of the Hohenzollern dynasty regarding the global territorial division; his megalomania only meant the preamble to greater damage. Pan-Germanism was not inhibited by the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, it became radicalized until it reached the hell of the Second World War. Wilhelm II was the facade of Adolf Hitler. What will follow after Donald Trump?

Understanding the primitivism of the Trumpist elite that governs the White House can shed light on the prospects of the new world order.

Although it is said that Eurasia represents the new axis of global control where Donald Trump represents the Russian doll, the truth is that the Anglo-Saxon and neoliberal plutocrats can hardly be dominated as happened with the oligarchs under the aegis of Vladimir Putin; the silovik nomenklatura cannot control the world even if it tries to. The realism of force is absolute in the present and surviving democracies, as well as colonized societies, have to consider it.

For Mexico, it means that traditional American imperialism has gone out of control and anything can happen; the prospect of a national future similar to what happened between Ukraine and Russia does not have to be ruled out; Trump's insistence that Canada join the United States can translate into an order for Mexico that can hardly be ignored if the national government and the Morena regime continue adrift.

Since the six-year term of Felipe Calderón Hinojosa, when Mexico was forced by the Mérida Initiative of the Americans to promote a low-intensity war against drug trafficking, the limits of governability were reduced exponentially; now, the presidency of the republic has to reduce the capacity of mobilization of the powers that be and return to the centralism of public administration to ward off a manic expansionism representative of the Trumpists. The impact of Trumpism on the world has been alarming; however, Mexico is the most affected nation of all.

Different actors, national and foreign, cause ungovernability in Mexico; they weaken the presidency of the republic not only to prioritize their particular interests. Now, the gaze of the North American empire is more abusive and perhaps the national government can take advantage of the situation to overtake the powers that be.

Felipe Calderón made the mistake of considering that the national institutional forces had the capacity to contain the pressure of the different interest groups - legal and illegal - in the country, the Mexican State accumulated one of the most significant defeats to its credit. The logic that a monster serves to scare away other monsters may be significant now, Sheinbaum can use the ambition of Yankee imperialism to return governability to Mexico as occurred during the government of Ernesto Zedillo and Miguel de la Madrid.

There is no dispute over the nation in Mexico due to different national development projects, there is an exponential factionalism caused by an internal colonialism and an authoritarian multiculturalism that has reached its limit and is encouraged by the historical enemies of state institutions.

Mexico does not have the organizational capacity of the Ukrainian State; however, under the situation of anarchy, a scenario of problems for society can develop that sets the tone for social displacements towards Central and South America and, even, a dystopia that harms North America. Mexico is to Donald Trump what the Russian winter was to Hitler and Napoleon.

Recovering governability in Mexico can guarantee the permanence of various social groups and, surely, would allow a safer collaboration with the United States for all actors.

Trump comes and his hegemony is raw, his pretension to take over the country is more than absolute and national unity is obligatory in the face of the impact it represents.

The North American succession in Mexico

 The North American succession in Mexico

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

Mexico is the piñata of political rhetoric in North American presidential campaigns, only with a probable victory for Donald Trump it is more certain that they will increase aggressiveness against Mexicans

According to the latest demographic data, the polls for the presidential election in the United States favor the Republican party and, particularly, Donald Trump.

The impacts of a Trump presidency on our country have been more vociferous than negative, although anti-Mexican campaigns are beginning to structure an American electorate that demands objective measures to inhibit the contagion of a Failed State.

Mexico is the piñata of political rhetoric in North American presidential campaigns, only with a probable victory for Donald Trump it is more certain that some White House policies will increase the traditional aggressiveness against Mexicans.

Mexico is a tributary state of North America, that is, although it is true that there is a colonialism that has been transformed into a symbiotic relationship, we must ask ourselves how much things can change when a presidential administration is developed in the hands of the Republican party and, fundamentally, of the Trumpists.

Due to its satellite status, the Mexican State functions in a logic of subordination to the core that holds it.

If Trump wins, the proposals he has made regarding the Mexican neighborhood should be moderately developed.

The regulation of drug trafficking, emigration and the strategic location of manufacturing seem to be the main points in the American electorate.

Mexico represents a significant point in the transfer and production of narcotics consumed by American society. The Mexican cartels have caused a disaster that forces the United States to remove them from the country and relocate them to ours.

There is extreme regulation of drug trafficking in North America and the increase in violence in the war on drugs for Mexico.

Emigration is similar to drug trafficking, although they are common issues in many cases and, therefore, the demand is for their reduction.

Deportation is a fact, so, in addition to the country being configured as a receptacle government for Latin American emigration, labor and economic measures will also have to be considered aimed at improving the upcoming social situation.

Subsidies from the United States will be essential to address the migrant phenomenon and the creation of a labor policy independent of the Private Initiative. The Welfare State will continue in Mexico.

Manufacturing has left aside other aspects of colonialism, it may even replace the neo-extractivism that violates many regions of the country.

Neoliberal and progressive economic analysts consider it to be an exceptional opportunity for Mexico in the context of a Sino-American Cold War.

But manufacturing requires increasing the educational level of Mexican society and mobilizing conglomerates of professionals to the northern border or urbanizing the Mexican south.

The Fourth Transformation has not been able to modify Mexico's dependent condition towards the United States; In reality it is impossible.

Although Morena is consolidating a more or less stable transmission of power in several regions; It remains in doubt whether the political cadres he recruits will understand the Mexican-American dynamics and the federal administration's ability to control them.

Political stability is essential to develop the colonialism that our country is experiencing in the best possible way.

The PRI developed a non-competitive authoritarianism that, despite everything, allowed an understanding with the US empire; Neoliberalism put an end to all of this.

The inhibition of a PRI model in Morena is a trigger for factionalism that harms relations with North America.

The social crisis caused by neoliberalism has Mexico on the brink of invasion by the United States.

The non-competitive authoritarianism of the PRI was –contravening the myths- with respect to the militant political class, something that MORENA has as a risk and its capacity for development is not foreseen.

The colonized space

 the colonized space

Diego Martin Velazquez Caballero

In these moments of global geopolitical change it seems that traditional hegemonies are crumbling, it is even being affirmed -abruptly- that everything has become the third world. This situation requires a new look at imperialism, particularly the North American from the perspective of our country. The need for a bloc economy and the concentration of powerful states in their areas of influence has long been affirmed.

The United States has exhausted itself and can no longer exercise that world hegemony that led to the victory of the Cold War. Capitalist liberal democracy, neoliberalism and rule based on mercantile justice have failed. The great American power cannot control its former regional enemies, but; Above all, it does not recognize its economic elites who have gone mad: Freadmanian anarchist liberalism is generating the end of the planet.

Mexico became an American Sicily for following Hayek's neoliberal model. It has become a narco-state that breaks the governability of the dominated, but can also destroy the Empire. It is critical that America recognize the insignificance of neoliberal discourse and the inability of corporate managers to take back the world, Atlas Shrugged must be brought down because humanity and America are going extinct. The end of England is in sight.

Keynes's political-economic model recovers guarantee at this time, the Welfare State cannot be for an oligarchy that subsidizes its racist affluence; if the capitalist groups want money, let them convince people with excellent products and become human with humans. Beyond the reptilian and illuminati subterfuges with which some refer to their power, they should rather be meant as psychopaths equivalent to any selfish mobster.

The United States must rebuild Latin America in a new vision of the Marshall Plan that closes the cycle of political modernization and institutionalization. A market that keeps societies in the Middle Ages or feudalism is not a market. It generates poverty and all kinds of pathologies that the United States has in the south of its territory. The State is first!

The global conflict forces us to look intelligently at the crisis of liberal democracies and, particularly, of capitalism. It is essential to find the way out that corresponds to the historical speed of each people and the alternative modernity that corresponds to it. The gatopardismo proposed by the imperialists of the market only heats up the environmental damage of the planet and the atomic destruction.

Should the US invade Mexico?

 Should the US invade Mexico?

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero 

The conflict in Ukraine has led to a rethinking of the relationship and the social fractures between Mexicans as well as between Mexico and the United States. The debate regarding the reasons for the Ukrainian groups that have developed a previous civil war can be raised in almost the same way in our country: there is a social fracture -perhaps several more- between individuals, which refers to preferences regarding the tradition and modernity. In Ukraine, the region close to Russia has pro-Russian sentiment and cultural reasons for choosing tsarist Orthodox Christianity, conservative authoritarianism, and Eurasianism; the western zone identifies with the values ​​of capitalist liberal democracy as well as the postmodern values ​​of consumerist cultural metastasis. The European East/West has been translated as the Mexican North/South due to the opposition to Morena and the 4T. Just as the pro-American Ukrainians call for NATO intervention to confront Russia, even at the expense of bursting the nuclear cataclysm that would end humanity; In the same way, a large part of pro-American neoliberal Mexicans ask for North American intervention against the national government as if all the evils of the republic had begun in 2018.

Vladimir Putin has pointed out that the military intervention in Ukraine is due to the genocide that Nazi paramilitary groups and drug addicts committed against the population with cultural and racial ancestry identified as pro-Russian. This argument is important to understand the geopolitics of the United States towards Mexico and the reasons of the right that supports interventionism. In Mexico, the gangs of Nazis, drug traffickers and genocide; they have acted - at least during the 20th century - as allies of North America. The monstrosities that Russia is committing against Ukrainian democracy have been done by the United States against Mexico for most of its history.

The United States, not the democrat but the insane imperial Caesar, has used pentagonism to sponsor conservative and neoliberal dictatorships that not only exterminated actors resistant to modernity and capitalism, but also discarded nationalist armies and military defenses, as is now happening in Mexico. Anomie and anarchy developed uncontrollably during the neoliberal era to subsidize the informal and military economy of the United States. Arms trafficking from the United States to Mexico shows the indolence and hypocrisy of Democratic-Republican companies and governments. The paramilitary groups and political coalitions that the United States has financed for a long time are also part of the war crimes committed by Yankee imperialism. Mexico and Ukraine have similar stories, you just have to see who is financing the mafias of Nazis and drug addicts that cause genocide.

North America has waged a secret war against Mexico since the very moment of its independence, conferring on itself the invisible power that has governed our country since colonial times. Mexican neocolonialism is pro-Yankee, pro-Hispanist and neoliberal. America's secret war against Mexico began in 1821 and is about to take control of the country. The Ukrainian scenario is no different from various events in the history of the country. Ukraine cannot join NATO and Mexico cannot be free, democratic, egalitarian, independent, legal, sovereign.

The invisible power fueled by the United States against Mexico has colonized all spheres of human life in our society. The American Union speaks of invading the Mexican Republic now that a government intends to change the structural violence that sustains the Creole and administrative oligarchies of the empire. The pentagonist press and intelligentsia have always pointed to Mexico as a criminal nation, a failed state; but it is not stated that the mafias and sultanates are allies of the CIA and the DEA.

The north of the country was intervened to detonate unprecedented violence that has become the real wall with the US, also as a justification to militarize the country and weaken the Armed Forces and, in this way, finally develop a military contingent completely North American service.

The Mexican State and the Armed Forces are already in a war against the paramilitary and Nazi advance of the United States. The War of the year 2080 envisioned by George Friedmann is a cruel reality, with one important difference: the financial power of drug trafficking is in the United States and neoliberalism has only served for extermination and neo-extractivism.

Vladimir Putin is not wrong when he points out that the Western world has avoided denazification, it is the great slope of the capitalist world. The United States is the Fourth Reich and financier of genocidal fascism. Democracies die because Nazism lives.