CIA (Catholic Intelligence Agency). From John O´Really to Edmund Walsh

 

CIA (Catholic Intelligence Agency). From John O´Really to Edmund Walsh 

CLXP

In Mexico, the San Patricio Battalion that collaborated with our country in the war of 1846, defending it from North American imperialism in full expansion, is highly appreciated. The martyrdom of the members of the San Patricio Battalion was even as noble as that of the Niños Héroes de Chapultepec, hence, in commemoration of the gallant defense that the Mexicans of that time implemented against the North American invader, the generous sacrifice and immolation of the Irishmen of the San Patricio Battalion is an indelible part of national history.

Probably due to the human cost, the American Irish of the 20th century decided not to commit any more suicides, even if they were heroic, but that would bring them greater misfortunes than they accumulated in their emigrations and their own struggles.

The solidarity of the San Patricio Battalion with Mexico was an act of transcendent generosity driven by a natural Catholic syncretism. The cost was total for the members of the San Patricio Battalion. Irish Catholic support for Mexico would never be the same again.

The Cristero War that took place in Mexico, a civil war, although also promoted from abroad by the geopolitical interests of the Vatican, led to the intervention of North American Catholicism from a pragmatic perspective, but which was useful to complement a pacification process that was to the detriment of the regime of the Mexican revolution and consolidated colonialism over our country.

This condition resulted in the fact that the nationalist and revolutionary rhetoric became opaque and almost reached the point of being cancelled. Edmund Walsh and the different groups of North American Catholics pragmatically promoted the pacification of the Cristero conflict in Mexico so that the Catholic geopolitical strategy against communism would continue not only in Mexico but also in the United States and, prior to the Cold War, mainly in Europe.

Mario Ramírez Rancaño proposes a significant distinction in the Holy See's diplomatic approach towards the weak and the strong. In the global period between the two world wars, the Bishop of Rome faced geographical conditions that threatened the influence and hegemonic capacity of the Catholic Church. The cases of Italy and Mexico are representative in this respect. In Italy, the geographical power of the Church was reduced to that of the Vatican State, while in Mexico the Cristero conflict began. Ramírez Rancaño points out the different spirit of the Pope towards Mussolini and towards General Plutarco Elías Calles. With the Duce, the Vatican had a submissive attitude, while with General Calles, it showed a racist, classist and arrogant attitude of Pius XI. Power respects power, and perhaps for this reason the understanding with Mussolini was immediate and effective, while relations with Mexico required war.

The North American Catholics, the White Catholics (Polish, Italian, French, Irish, German, Ukrainian, Rumanian, etc.), exerted a notable influence on the foreign policy of the United States, but, above all, on the intelligence apparatus, particularly the CIA and FBI. The most significant role of that influence was the anti-communist rage that unfortunately founded several organizations and developed the dirty war strategy in various parts of the world.

Anti-communist paranoia in the vein of Walsh, McCarthy, Dulles, Donovan and Hoover; now it predominates in the IMCO, the PRIANRD and the business organizations that protect Claudio X. González. In the 20th century, the White Catholics prevailed over the Hispanic Catholics -among them the Mexicans-. It is nothing new and case studies abound. Mexico's course towards liberation, towards sovereignty, always seems to these groups the road to hell, the route of the communist Jewish Masonic conspiracy. What's next in the CIA's coup strategies? Claudia Sheinbaum's Jewish ancestry? The Merovingian lineage of Marcelo Ebrard?

Anti-communism is colonialism. Claudio X. González and associates do not have a project for the country and every day they discover their anti-Mexican and coup project. The White Catholics have always had a North American ultranationalist project, to which the Holy See adds, to which they have had to graft the WASP messianism and where the Hispanic Catholics do not fit. Catholicism in North America is probably the majority religion; however, the White Catholic and Hispanic Catholic distinction establishes that Ibero-America has no place in a geopolitical project that is increasingly eugenic, as can be seen on the northern border of Mexico.

Just as at the time of the Reform in the 19th century, Mexican society understands that conservative groups harm the social order; this is the reason that the land supported the generation of enlightened liberal Masonics and that now popular sympathies, according to electoral polls, benefit the National Regeneration Movement. Lopez Obradorism also has the support of Christian and conservative religious groups that seek to be independent of the North American hegemony. When the liberal generation of 1857 created the legal bases of the Mexican State, it did so with the support of a part of the population that was dissatisfied with the actions of the Spanish colony and the ecclesiastical bureaucracy itself. The liberals found in Enlightenment philosophy the appropriate means to explain the human rights of common people and to gain legitimacy to delimit the influence of the Catholic Church in a public order that was immoral for the marginalized social classes.

Mexican nationalism has a long historical background, which is why colonialist attempts only end up strengthening it. The Hispanic Catholics know that they are alone, that they do not count for anyone and, above all, they do not exist for the eugenic projects of whiteness. That is the reason that a party called MORENA reached a historic vote in 2018 and that those brown Catholic majorities in Latin America and North America put aside the imperialist strategies of the White Catholics.

The CIA could attend to new political experiences such as those exposed cinematically in, for example, the film “Our Brand Is Crisis”, with Sandra Bullock. Really try to do something positive, something good; they can start by rebuilding political science and international relations programs that regenerate Christian democracy. The scarecrow of anti-communism just doesn't work.

Anticommunism, the old rage in Latin America

Anticommunism, the old rage in Latin America
January 31, 2019
Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero
https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2019/01/31/Anticomunismo-la-a%C3%B1eja-rabia-hispanoamericana

The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) no longer exists; However, in Latin America the political culture seems to have not heard. When Latin American governments and politicians insist on becoming nationalists, soon disqualifications arise where the anticommunist paroxysm radically sprouts. This unreason has been the factor that, throughout the twentieth century, has prevented the consolidation of the State and the Republic; underdevelopment is the obvious consequence. To end the eternal Latin American poverty, in terms of Rhina Roux, it is enough to return their costumes to the Prince.

Anti-communism was accompanied by unbearable US military interventions. The geopolitical capacity of the North American empire has been radical in the conjunctural moments of Latin nationalism. But times have changed, democratization and the market modified the international game; The United States will end up hurting itself if it decides to summon the anticommunist networks of its strategy.

Robert Pastor describes the conflictive cycle of Spanish-American relations as "swirling". Neither learns nor tries to understand the other. The concrete thing is that Yankee interventionism only results in poverty, corruption, emigration, drug trafficking and all the ills of what is now called the "Failed State". These diseases have been infected and spread in the American Union, the advances of these pathologies within American social capital are stratospheric. Samuel Huntington and George Friedman have warned it decades ago, the United States must stop attending to the ayatollahs of hate and religious fundamentalists just as they did when they let go of Edmund Walsh if they do not want to fail as it happened recently with the most extensive of their paralyzes governmental.

Venezuela's populist regime is exhausted, it's true; however, worse is a military intervention and ridiculous an immediate request for elections. Maduro must be helped to complete his government or make general elections at a reasonable, fair and competitive time. To seek a solution like the one in Guatemala in 1954 is to forget how much the world has changed. The anti-communists stayed in 1905. The world can scrupulously observe the following elections and the Bolivarian government must abandon power if the people no longer hold it.

Today there is Russia, an old empire with a geopolitical and military power similar to the United States but with a greater capacity to adapt to the times of globalization. American society knows the Russian power in its own flesh, it is the modern instruments - formal and informal - that allowed the recovery and development of the most significant central state of the Slavic Baltic civilization. The 1962 crisis could be repeated; but, this time, the nuclear warheads and something else would remain. Venezuela is not alone.

Robert Pastor rightly points out that the teleological principles of American foreign policy must change with respect to Latin America. The American Union must extend throughout the continent and the region can share development, democracy and security in a co-responsible and confederate manner. Local anti-communism must be rejected not only because it is anachronistic but also because it is dangerous and abusive. Latin American schizophrenia always results in the benefit of a parasitic and medieval oligarchy. Even though the Catholic Church has ceased to be anti-Communist and Mario Bergoglio himself placed himself in a position similar to that of the Mexican government, the Constantine radicals long for the arrival of the Marines everywhere and in all the countries of the hemisphere. His great technocratic capacity only reaches to produce mentalities like that of Luis Pazos.

Anti-anti-Communism can be a reference of our time. Communism is dead and it is time that anticommunism - and its brothers: Nazism, Judeophobia, clericalism, fascism, etc. - also do it. How else will ideas and politics be renewed in our republics?