Does the Wall or War? The Mexican dilema
By Diego Velázquez
Each time the lack of strategies by the Mexican government is more evident to determine a course of action if Donald Trump reaches the presidency of the United States. The omen of Republican victory has not been taken seriously and time is running out. Decisions of Mexico show the degree of disability that exists at management levels of public administration as well as the institutions responsible for safeguarding national sovereignty. The country's Foreign Service does not escape the corruption, nepotism and cronyism that distinguish our policy. Arthur Neville Chamberlain, at least, got a peace treaty signed on a napkin, the Mexican Embassy in the United States seems, above all, an Agency Tenancingo.
A successful campaign of Donald Trump will have high costs for Mexico, not seriously listen to the ideas that structure the discourse of neo-conservative populism can lead the country to unprecedented scenarios where problems complicate for lacking from now on a firm position and clear against U.S. Donald Trump has been insistent on the idea of strengthening or rebuilding a wall; If Mexico refuses to pay the cost of the other alternative is war. Why these ideas are not taken seriously? Jorge Carrillo Olea has warned that this set of expressions constitute a severe risk to the national security of Mexico; more serious is the lack of foreign policy in our country.
Instead of paying by the Wall, Mexico should strive to obtain the license of construction. The Wall is not a bad idea if viewed from the historical condition that allowed the building of the Great Wall of China. It is, approximately measuring 20 thousand kilometers away, took more than 600 years to be built and occupied almost a million people in its work, it may even become an excellent measure to bring welfare to the ailing labor situation in Mexico . Taking into account material inputs, various sectors of the construction industry would benefit. Donald Trump has been a cost of 8000 million, about the state budget for a full six years. Build better anticipate and avoid the obligation to pay.
The wall would not serve to contain the phenomenon of drugs and migration, as has also served the sheet that was added several years in some areas of the northern border, migration and drug trafficking remain on the rise during the construction process ; but its implementation would improve relations between the US and Mexico as well as lying to the societies of both countries and to assume that their governments work. In politics ends and always negotiating the Wall is peccadilloes for the interests of both countries remain as always. The day that Mexican cartels suspend the flow of drugs to the nation of the bars and stars, then yes that gringos will face a huge national security problem, never have worried the health of their young, they just want power over the business.
The construction of the wall would be an opportunity for Mexico to regulate the way the modernization progresses. We are not modern liberal style but have a narcocaciquil modernity that increasingly involves more of a schizophrenic society civilizational conflict. With the modernization Wall madness addition to US interference in other aspects of daily life are also stop. In the future, if the fallacy of Wall convinces voters gringos, Mexico may stop caring about the imperialist geopolitics.
The other option, expect the war with the United States, seems unrealistic and yet, against the inability of the Mexican government, is the scenario that is more likely. Waiting military confrontation, it indicates the possibility that Mexico could become Iraq or Vietnam for America. The difference from previous wars is that there is now a huge Hispanic population in those territories which, eventually, will have to be redefined to determine the course of the conflagration. The fact is that now, unlike in the past, thanks to the population there emigrante- a remarkable geographical progress within US territory. The penetration of the US space leaves translucir that the conflict would be internal, such a conflict to the Civil War that almost succeeded in the absence of the Yankee Empire. Samuel Huntington was right when he saw in every Hispanic spearhead of mexicanidad claiming revenge. And the situation has been, is and will be. As the main cause of the American Civil War Is there a slave who does not want revenge? America has lost the war against Hispanidad. No more skirmishes as the Alamo or Columbus. Cities like New York, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, Atlanta and several dozen have a second Spanish side that is crouching in front of the WASP decline. The twentieth century was the US opportunity to regenerate his neighbor and violent offender, time passed and the Hispanidad advances as scrum. The American defeat, as they have assimilated their own neoconservative intellectuals, is cultural; but it is a capitulation without possibility of reversal. US would I act as did Russia in Ossetia, Chechnya and Crimea to protect your living space? Is the crisis of Enlightenment thought in the Anglo-Saxon culture shows the spread of modernity in Latin American institutions and values? Who is to blame for that within North America has more Latino drug cartels that terrorist groups? Are you ready United States to face an alliance between Muslim terrorism and Latin American drug trafficking within their own country? The likely Mexican-American conflagration as civil war, are the result of an infamous slavery and ambition.
A war between Mexico and the United States can generate a change in the global geopolitical correlation of power. The decline of the West shows that humanity can do without, as it has done, the enlightened thinking to cope with his life. George Friedman and Samuel Huntington have found a fortuitous relationship in the figure of Donald Trump. The Republican candidate has become a sincere globaphobic denouncing costs exclusive neoliberalism progress and public space and illustrated ethics.
United States and Mexico require a long break in their relationship. The more streamlined North America the problems of its southern neighbor, is spread most of its political perversion. The Mexican political class, under US protection, has only played mirreyes, ladies and Porkys, ie chiefs who go to college or narcojuniors. The lack of a national project for Mexico is a national security risk for North America and Western civilization project. If the United States continues to allow corruption, authoritarianism and drug trafficking abound in Mexico because that makes it easier to buy drugs, cheap labor and natural resources for economic growth, then, that support the coexistence of a monster that consent and legitimizing . In the early twentieth century when America was blackmailing Mexican governments with international recognition had an optimal relationship relative to the current excessively imitated where the Anglo-Saxon neoliberal model. Integration has been costly for the neighbor to the north and Mexico will continue, perhaps for several centuries with a civilizational gap whose responsibility lies in the elites and their role to monitor democratic processes and public policy.
http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2016/05/25/dilema-mexicano-el-muro-o-la-guerra/
By Diego Velázquez
Each time the lack of strategies by the Mexican government is more evident to determine a course of action if Donald Trump reaches the presidency of the United States. The omen of Republican victory has not been taken seriously and time is running out. Decisions of Mexico show the degree of disability that exists at management levels of public administration as well as the institutions responsible for safeguarding national sovereignty. The country's Foreign Service does not escape the corruption, nepotism and cronyism that distinguish our policy. Arthur Neville Chamberlain, at least, got a peace treaty signed on a napkin, the Mexican Embassy in the United States seems, above all, an Agency Tenancingo.
A successful campaign of Donald Trump will have high costs for Mexico, not seriously listen to the ideas that structure the discourse of neo-conservative populism can lead the country to unprecedented scenarios where problems complicate for lacking from now on a firm position and clear against U.S. Donald Trump has been insistent on the idea of strengthening or rebuilding a wall; If Mexico refuses to pay the cost of the other alternative is war. Why these ideas are not taken seriously? Jorge Carrillo Olea has warned that this set of expressions constitute a severe risk to the national security of Mexico; more serious is the lack of foreign policy in our country.
Instead of paying by the Wall, Mexico should strive to obtain the license of construction. The Wall is not a bad idea if viewed from the historical condition that allowed the building of the Great Wall of China. It is, approximately measuring 20 thousand kilometers away, took more than 600 years to be built and occupied almost a million people in its work, it may even become an excellent measure to bring welfare to the ailing labor situation in Mexico . Taking into account material inputs, various sectors of the construction industry would benefit. Donald Trump has been a cost of 8000 million, about the state budget for a full six years. Build better anticipate and avoid the obligation to pay.
The wall would not serve to contain the phenomenon of drugs and migration, as has also served the sheet that was added several years in some areas of the northern border, migration and drug trafficking remain on the rise during the construction process ; but its implementation would improve relations between the US and Mexico as well as lying to the societies of both countries and to assume that their governments work. In politics ends and always negotiating the Wall is peccadilloes for the interests of both countries remain as always. The day that Mexican cartels suspend the flow of drugs to the nation of the bars and stars, then yes that gringos will face a huge national security problem, never have worried the health of their young, they just want power over the business.
The construction of the wall would be an opportunity for Mexico to regulate the way the modernization progresses. We are not modern liberal style but have a narcocaciquil modernity that increasingly involves more of a schizophrenic society civilizational conflict. With the modernization Wall madness addition to US interference in other aspects of daily life are also stop. In the future, if the fallacy of Wall convinces voters gringos, Mexico may stop caring about the imperialist geopolitics.
The other option, expect the war with the United States, seems unrealistic and yet, against the inability of the Mexican government, is the scenario that is more likely. Waiting military confrontation, it indicates the possibility that Mexico could become Iraq or Vietnam for America. The difference from previous wars is that there is now a huge Hispanic population in those territories which, eventually, will have to be redefined to determine the course of the conflagration. The fact is that now, unlike in the past, thanks to the population there emigrante- a remarkable geographical progress within US territory. The penetration of the US space leaves translucir that the conflict would be internal, such a conflict to the Civil War that almost succeeded in the absence of the Yankee Empire. Samuel Huntington was right when he saw in every Hispanic spearhead of mexicanidad claiming revenge. And the situation has been, is and will be. As the main cause of the American Civil War Is there a slave who does not want revenge? America has lost the war against Hispanidad. No more skirmishes as the Alamo or Columbus. Cities like New York, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, Atlanta and several dozen have a second Spanish side that is crouching in front of the WASP decline. The twentieth century was the US opportunity to regenerate his neighbor and violent offender, time passed and the Hispanidad advances as scrum. The American defeat, as they have assimilated their own neoconservative intellectuals, is cultural; but it is a capitulation without possibility of reversal. US would I act as did Russia in Ossetia, Chechnya and Crimea to protect your living space? Is the crisis of Enlightenment thought in the Anglo-Saxon culture shows the spread of modernity in Latin American institutions and values? Who is to blame for that within North America has more Latino drug cartels that terrorist groups? Are you ready United States to face an alliance between Muslim terrorism and Latin American drug trafficking within their own country? The likely Mexican-American conflagration as civil war, are the result of an infamous slavery and ambition.
A war between Mexico and the United States can generate a change in the global geopolitical correlation of power. The decline of the West shows that humanity can do without, as it has done, the enlightened thinking to cope with his life. George Friedman and Samuel Huntington have found a fortuitous relationship in the figure of Donald Trump. The Republican candidate has become a sincere globaphobic denouncing costs exclusive neoliberalism progress and public space and illustrated ethics.
United States and Mexico require a long break in their relationship. The more streamlined North America the problems of its southern neighbor, is spread most of its political perversion. The Mexican political class, under US protection, has only played mirreyes, ladies and Porkys, ie chiefs who go to college or narcojuniors. The lack of a national project for Mexico is a national security risk for North America and Western civilization project. If the United States continues to allow corruption, authoritarianism and drug trafficking abound in Mexico because that makes it easier to buy drugs, cheap labor and natural resources for economic growth, then, that support the coexistence of a monster that consent and legitimizing . In the early twentieth century when America was blackmailing Mexican governments with international recognition had an optimal relationship relative to the current excessively imitated where the Anglo-Saxon neoliberal model. Integration has been costly for the neighbor to the north and Mexico will continue, perhaps for several centuries with a civilizational gap whose responsibility lies in the elites and their role to monitor democratic processes and public policy.
http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2016/05/25/dilema-mexicano-el-muro-o-la-guerra/