Ir al contenido principal

MORENA/PRIANRD: No escape from the black circle

 MORENA/PRIANRD: No escape from the black circle

Diego Martin Velazquez Caballero



Although the specter of governability begins to be represented as a threat to the Fourth Transformation, over time it can be seen that the anomias and pathologies that the country accumulates have been determined by the United States of America. Since the fateful years of López Mateos, social issues and national stability have been complicated, with the passing of the six-year terms, the border of chaos has been reached. It is impossible for the current six-year term to effectively slow down a process that has been accumulating for decades; but it cannot be said that he has not done anything.

If Mexico falls, the Yankee empire too. This is a truism that is evident in the Pentagon, the CIA, the DEA and other agencies that oversee US power. The point is that the Mexican political class also knows it and, for better or for worse, they have jointly decided that the country, the Mexican Republic, should be established as the backyard of the North Americans. It is true that Mexico is dangerously close to the condition of a failed state thanks to neoliberalism, but it is that it is convenient for imperialism; Have we forgotten who canceled the possibility of having a Japan below the Rio Grande? How many million tons of drugs does the US need to be in harmony? The economic superpower has all the technology at its disposal, but why does it need fifty million Mexican “wet slaves” for its fertile economy, plus those who crossed today?

America is not going to change; no matter how much the neoliberal and conservative right refer to themselves, to their style of governing, as more Swedish, Dutch, Spanish; In the end, they end up the same as always, paying the flat fee to the global super cop for running the club and nothing more.

Manuel Camacho Solís, Antonio Velasco Piña and Pablo González Casanova have a singular coincidence: political power and governability in Mexico reside in the military, in no one else. What is the difference between an authoritarian nationalist regime (populism/pricomunist Guadalupano) and another technocratic-bureaucratic-military regime (neoliberalism)? The victim is society. Perhaps the government of the 4T has done something for the most needy in the country; however, neoliberals only want a welfare state for the rich. In general, the country is at the disposal of the United States; the administrators are changed, but the armed forces take care of the establishment. Even a civil war in Mexico is bearable for North America, but the invasion of the United States towards our country would constitute a defeat like Vietnam; the guerrilla war would be inexhaustible for the American Union, as well as the constant migration of temporary groups.

Mexico, in contemporary times, has always lived on the brink of chaos, no matter how ungovernable the Lopezobrador government is blamed, the neoliberals did not have the country any better and things will never improve.

When we focus on Mexican ungovernability, one wonders who manages it best for the US. No matter how ungovernable you want to manifest in Mexico, it goes as far as North America supports. Even if the extreme right longs for it with all its humanist soul, Mexico will not reach the levels of Peru, where the criollos can go around killing indigenous people left and right. Ungovernability in Mexico can reach the levels of the Mexican Revolution or the Cristero War; something else would mean a guerrilla war that could infect the southern United States and could trigger an American civil war, a flank for the real enemies of the United States: Islam, Russia or China, even Europe.

Has the Guadalupan pri communism of the 4T for the US ceased to be useful? No. On the contrary. Given the balances of ungovernability, authoritarian nationalism is better than military bureaucratic technocracy; unless the United States wants to make Mexico a real hell worse than Ukraine. Can the PRIANRD bring us to the level of the Ukraine? Yes, and they are capable of worse. Denmark or Sweden represent the sick beliefs of the aspirationists, it is not a utopia but a madness; they point to the populists as crazy, but to make the Anti-liberal Spains liberal is true marijuana.

Mexico is Mexico, and as long as you have the United States as your neighbor, you will always be far from God. Even if the PRIANRD triumphs in the next elections of 2024, the Mexican Army is the only link in Mexican governance, the neoliberals will continue to militarize the country, as much or more as AMLO has done. And, like good hypocrites, they are going to shed more blood as they did in Calderonism.

Anarchy is the limit for the absolute domination of the United States in Mexico. Meanwhile, only hell is the option of the false right and left.

Entradas populares de este blog

Perfil del Politólogo

Perfil profesional del Politólogo o Licenciado en Ciencia Política. A medida que la sociedad se hace más compleja, la pugna por el poder se torna más sofisticada, y con ello la capacidad para comprender y ubicar los fenómenos políticos en el contexto donde se desenvuelven, en el escenario donde se manifiestan y en el nivel donde se proyectan. Perfil del politólogo Actualmente la Ciencia Política presenta, al menos, cinco modos de aplicación práctica: ha ayudado a organizar el debate sobre varios modelos de reforma política, ha proporcionado críticas y análisis orientados hacia el establecimiento de medidas políticas, ha desarrollado la función que cabe a los consejeros políticos, ha contribuido en la información política y a elevar la cultura política de los ciudadanos, así como ha comenzado a participar en las predicciones políticas. El Politólogo es el profesional que estudia científicamente la política y, por ende, dónde se ubica, cómo se ejerce y de qué manera s...

JUSTICIA PARA CARMEN HERNANDEZ MONTEJO

El Dr. Carmen Hernández fue mi compañero en el doctorado en historia y estudios regionales de la UV, por supuesto que creo en su inocencia porque un secuestrador no se pone a estudiar como él lo hacia. ¿Qué sentido tiene pasar hambres, soledad y regaños de profesores sólo para obtener el grado de doctor si podía vivir como rey siendo político o delincuente -que son sinónimos-? Carmen apenas estaba cosechando los frutos de su desempeño y no es justo que se le involucre así. Nuestra polecía es tan buena que convence a un burro de decir que es un conejo, y ni qué decir de los gobernantes; ahora el gobernador de campeche, con notable presunción de la indivisión de poderes que predomina en su estado, ya dictaminó que serán 40 años los que Carmen estará en la Cárcel. Su afirmación sólo confirma quién le está poniendo esta trampa, es decir, desde donde viene la estrategia para lastimar al Dr. Carmen. El asunto tiene tintes políticos y seguramente alguien está interesado en destruir la imagen ...

LIBRO GRATIS: LA DERECHA MEXICANA EN EL SIGLO XX: AGONÍA, TRANSFORMACIÓN Y SUPERVIVENCIA

DESCARGAR  GRATIS    El proceso del conservadurismo y derecha en el caso de América Latina, y particularmente México, encuentra una manifestación singular respecto de la experiencia occidental. Para la situación mexicana el caso de Inglaterra y Francia resulta aleccionador. Mientras la experiencia británica implica una evolución donde el cambio político y religioso motiva el gradualismo, para la condición francesa existen posiciones radicales donde cada dimensión ideológica se potencia conforme avanza el tiempo. LA DERECHA MEXICANA EN EL SIGLO XX