The old regime and Puebla
Diego Martin Velazquez Caballero
The inconsistency of the Puebla Morenista government with the principles of the Fourth Transformation in Mexico has ceased to be a novelty. The entity lives a dark PRI night in the transition under the PAN and Morenista franchise. The indicators that evaluate the quality of democracy have plummeted during most of the alternating governments and are now in the standards of null certification. The PRI turncoat to the different political parties that have occupied the state government and the insertion of PRI collaborators in alternating governments, characterize the serious crisis of cadres that exists in parties other than the PRI as well as the lack of preparation or, outright , absolute incompetence in non-PRI militancy.
A few decades ago, when the PRI/system had heart attacks that anticipated the crisis of the regime of the Mexican revolution, Manuel Camacho Solís pointed out the excess of political empiricism and the lack of project and political ideology in the PRI members of the eighties in the Last century. Faced with the end of the Cold War and the beginning of globalization, it was necessary to technocratically renew the government and develop a new political doctrine in the face of the vulgar empiricism of the last generations that distinguished the PRI class. A little earlier, Daniel Cosío Villegas showed the exhaustion of authoritarian governance and coarseness that characterized Shared Development.
How valid the arguments of Manuel Camacho Solís and Daniel Cosío Villegas to understand the alternating state governments in Puebla! Only the PRI has political cadres to run the government! The other political parties are a hesitation that does not even reach a dark shadow. That is why Puebla is governed by PRI members of all political parties, the opposition to the PRI is simply annulled. PRI empiricism, no matter how vulgar and ordinary it may be represented, is the only way of effective governance in the face of chaos: an order at whatever cost.
The different spaces that parties other than the PRI have occupied at the municipal and state levels of authority are characterized by extreme disability. Now, the fear of alternating governments to the social movements that legitimately return to the streets to demand attention, well-being and spaces, impels the present government to return to PRI authoritarian governance. Before it was with the PAN Morenovallismo and now with the Morenista barboism, the incompetence overwhelms its dependencies and that is why PRI members are urgently needed.
Loyalty arguments to affirm and support characters from the old regime (better bad for known than good for knowing), are more incredible especially since most of the collaborators are defectors. How big is the betrayal, disloyalty and incompetence in the militancy of the other parties that it is necessary to return to the PRI?
The social, economic and political indicators that fail Puebla show us the type of public official who has been empowered by political alternation, but also holds society accountable; Every people has the government it deserves. What is the reason that President López Obrador does not pay a little attention to Puebla? Marta Eugenia García Ugarte finds the reasons in the extreme conservatism of Puebla.