Don´t be stupid! Ricardo Anaya is Neoliberal

Don´t be stupid! Ricardo Anaya is Neoliberal
By Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

The apparent conflict between the Mexican ultra-right, the technocracy and the Atlacomulco Group, has as its purpose - and seems to have succeeded - to increase the popularity and level of knowledge of the right presidential candidate. The apparent persecution that was implemented in the finances of Ricardo Anaya will not be able to investigate anything new in the way of doing business that the extreme right practices. If José Antonio Meade and the Atlacomulco Group wanted to affect the Yunque, there are elements more serious than the voracity and corruption characteristic of the political groups in Mexico, all the drama can be condensed in the "Friend Fire" and it seems to have added a few points to the candidate of the PANPRD.
The serious issue is that AMLO and MORENA have been left out of these events. The apparent calm and parsimony of López Obrador is an element that can cost him dearly, such as when he decided not to attend the debates in 2006 or to slow down his campaign in 2012. The dynamism of the oligarchy and the geopolitical powers that govern Mexico is something that should be analyze with great rigor so that the possibility of political change in Mexico is not broken up. For the Mexican far right and the Consortium of Corruption, Anaya is the saving tablet without importing all the crap it contains.
The PRIANRD prophets have used the metaphor of the electoral tiger to discredit popular opposition nationalism; However, the tiger is nothing compared to the African hippopotamus that corruption, drug trafficking and poverty mean.
Morena must understand that the opportunities to accede to the presidency of the republic do not come and go. Staying still will be taken into account by electoral tendencies. Anaya managed to spread his person while Morena has obtained an ambiguous image for both received defector.
For Mexico, the continuity of the neoliberals -technicians, far right, atlacomulcos and chuchos- at the head of the government, implies the perdition, the apocalypse, the precipice. It is not that Mexico can be Venezuela, it is simply about stopping the neoliberal degeneration that has made us reach a Failed State. The Mexican question is worse than the Venezuelan one in subjects like insecurity, feminicide, migration, poverty, disappeared, drug trafficking, etc.
Ricardo Anaya belongs to the Consortium that from the Salinato has taken charge of usurping the political power and depriving the Mexicans of everything they can. Anaya is a member of a Creole, Hispanic, Catholic, ultraconservative, technocratic and white bourgeoisie that has not had any misgivings to expel millions of Mexicans towards emigration, drug trafficking, poverty and corruption.
Juan Carlos Domínguez Virgen developed an academic text and a play to observe the costs of the failed modernization that the corrupt neoliberals have generated. Ricardo Anaya is part of the Meteorists who have destroyed Mexico and its people. It is a great enrichment opportunity to implement Megaprojects to deprive people of their resources, landscape, water, land and sun. Ricardo Anaya and José Antonio Meade, supervised the worst generation of governors, promoted the Death Projects that are privatizing the entire national space. The Spanish transnationals and the Vatican have obtained infinite profits to support and protect these thieves.
Beyond neoliberal corruption, the Consortium does not want to discuss and debate Megaprojects as the New International Airport of Mexico City. Neoliberal despotism can only be compared to the scientism of the Porfiristas. Discussing which modern project is what Mexico wants is fundamental in these political campaigns. The neoliberal project presents cracks in many parts of the world, the societies of the western countries are choosing nationalist leaders who are going to correct macro and micro economic policies to generate justice and promote a new model of Welfare State. Mexico can not be late for history this time.
Ricardo Anaya is not a martyr of PAN's civilization persecuted by the terrible PRI, he is a neoliberal member of the neo-Porfirian consortium that developed the PRIANRD, aspires to a clerical dictatorship and maintains a neoliberalism that foreigners sponsor to plunder Mexico.



Domínguez Virgen, Juan Carlos. Megaprojects failed in Latin America. Ed. Instituto Mora. Mexico, 2015.

Domínguez Virgen, Juan Carlos. The Legend of Mu. Theater play. Mexico, 2016

MORENA. Cultural conservatism in México

Morena. Cultural conservatism in Mexico
Movimiento de Regeneración Nacional

March 1, 2018
https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2018/03/01/Morena-El-conservadurismo-cultural-en-M%C3%A9xico

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

A few days ago on TVunam, Argentine political scientist Flavia Freindenberg used a conceptual category to explain electoral political processes in Latin America. Elections in Chile, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Colombia, Brazil and Mexico are shaping scenarios where economic, political and social circumstances have activated the mechanisms of preservation and social self-defense. This reaction-cultural conservatism-obeys to the simplest characteristics of protection that human groups establish. The groups of these countries are considering serious risks derived from an irresponsible economic globalization. There are social indicators to show the deep damage that the neoliberal model establishes in education, health, gender, human rights and democracy.

The danger of the situation has reached such an extreme that the mechanisms of human protection have been activated, as happens when there is a cataclysm or tragedy. Hence, it is understood that the winning political options are outlined in a repertoire of anti-establishment candidates and representatives of a populist nationalism.

It is true that this context also constitutes the starting point for authoritarian regimes. Several dictators have gained power through democratic elections. However, social structures in Latin America are in a severe process of decomposition and society demands an urgent change. The PRIANRD has made the country a Failed State and, little by little, this reality has become conscious in a large part of the population. The corruption and cynicism of the contemporary political class has overcome the worst epochs in history.

There is no institution that works in present Mexico, it is enough to observe the profile of the national flag on its last anniversary. And the ruling class does not get anything positive. Deception, corruption as well as permanent factionalism generate an aberrant partycracy. Because of the same situation, the Army, the Catholic Church and the universities travel.

Characters representing Protestant Christianity, nationalists, outsiders, non-political trajectories, etc., have begun to generate sympathy and participation of citizens. It is an opportunity and a remarkable risk; but, perhaps, it is a need according to the time that is lived.

The PRIANRD is a danger for Mexico, they are exterminating what is left of the country. Hence, people opt for regime change and rejection of a continuity full of corruption, violence and parasitism.

Anti-systemic, nationalist, conservative and populist coalitions are marking the dynamics of political change in Latin America. Mexico represented the last link of a colonial neoliberalism that became impotent even to maintain order. The political forces are migrating to Morena's coalition not only because of a conservation superlative, the social order has been lost and nobody knows how to restore it. Morena is the name of the Bardo Monster that can redeem or annihilate Mexico.

Spain and Poland needed prudent leaders to promote amnesties, consensus and pacts. The change without rupture that Manuel Camacho Solis maintained from always and that, now, retakes an importance without comparison. The Catholic neoliberal right, like Polish communism and traditionalist Francoism, wafts everywhere. They are not right in anything. They are an example of the worst. By health they must leave and, at the same time, seek regeneration. With everything and the anthropological characteristics of Mexican culture, the political class and its powers have become alien, different, dangerous.

Is Andrés Manuel López Obrador a Revolutionary Conservator? At first it seems that way. It depends on the society that is not transformed into a Francisco I. Madero or Plutarco Elías Calles. It is up to Mexicans to value the republic, secularism, education and institutions that have inherited the blood of virtuous Mexicans. Globalization, Catholicism, the West and neoliberal order, present a historical crisis, each society is leading to safeguard their lives. Cultural conservatism is the ghost that travels the world, an opportunity and a tremendous risk