Huejotzingo and Udlap Consultores
March 6, 2020
Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero
https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2020/03/06/Huejotzingo-y-Udlap-Consultores
In the page of Udlap (University of the Americas-Puebla) where the agreements that their different consultancies obtain are shown, there is propaganda regarding the services that Udlap-Consultores provides in government advice and public policies. The data is important because in the aforementioned agreements regarding issues of government, security, culture, health, etc., the case of Huejotzingo and the current mayor as a graduate of the educational institution is mentioned.
In light of the student demonstrations for the events that took place in that municipality that cost the lives of three university students and an Uber driver, what is the meaning of this data? What is the importance between the Huejotzingo agreement and Udlap-Consultores? Perhaps the right thing is to ask: How responsible is Udlap Consultores for the bad public security policies in the municipality?
If one of the elements that stands out in business management is quality, Huejotzingo is a measure to indicate what Udlap-Consultores has. The rector Ernesto Derbez severely questions, if not “daily”, the decisions of the morenista governments at the federal and state level, what is the reason why he does not refer to local governments ?, particularly those that you consultants Advises and shows proudly.
The student demonstrations have made critical accusations accusing inefficiency of the state and capital government in Puebla; However, there is something that students who participate in them should also know to understand if the new governments are directly responsible. During the last ten years, the University Consortium legitimized the abusive morenovallism that dismantled the municipalities in Puebla and did corrupt business at the expense of the public treasury. Crime seized the state because the morenovallist "technocrats" only ruled for a dozen municipalities and forgot about the other 200 that our entity has. Why don't the rectors explain to the students that the abandonment of ten years was what caused the violence? 0, at least, why not take them to demonstrate against the mayor of Huejotzingo and Udlap-Consultants?
Another graduate of Udlap, Antonio Gali, implemented the "Smart Cities" policy approved by the "Think Tank" and the "Targets" of that institution. What did “Smart City” mean in Puebla? Impoverishment. Corruption. There is the failure and the excess of the bike lanes as well as the joke of hydraulic cement. They should explain to young university students that because of such corruption, poverty was generated, low quality of democracy and impunity. Things, by the way, that know how to measure in Udlap. Gali and the IMPLAN of the municipality of Puebla, developed - surely with the advice mentioned above - the best Municipal Development Plan in the world, which they never applied, because Gali left the Interim Governor and Puebla capital was ruled by a usurper who violated the Boards Auxiliaries where crime and violence reached extraordinary levels.
That, and not something else, is what causes death like that of young people at the Carnival of Huejotzingo. An alternating government cannot work wonders. Derbez knows it, there is his book, an editorial, theoretical and practical failure. He advised and was convinced of the megalomaniac who promised to fix everything in fifteen minutes and then legitimized who turned Mexico into a grave of unknown bodies. Have you already forgotten? How many University students killed the Felipe Calderón War? How many university students have murdered the extreme right in Mexico? And this question makes a lot of sense because perhaps the university students should also know the history of the Anticommunist University Front, the Tecos, the Intermarium, the anti-communism and the fervent admiration of Gustavo Díaz Ordaz for the slaughter of October 2, 1968 that the poblano conservatism has ; although, well, the extreme right says that it is not killing because they only killed a score. The membership of the prestigious private universities of Puebla to the Mexican Anti-Communist Federation and the World Anti-Communist League involved killing university students in exchange for CIA dollars. Oh, they got a lot of money! Do they still kill their death squads: Falcons, Wall, Face, Testimony and Hope? Surely.
The student movement in Puebla was manipulated by the entity's more petty and historically oligarchic interests. Even when it is affirmed that the current generations have more information and competences, the truth is that there are truths that are only discovered over time, perhaps the young people will one day realize with those who marched.Critical theory argues that it is always possible to manipulate society, convert man into mass, that is what has happened in Puebla and does not want to speak the truth. If the Businessmen and the Far Right were interested in the life of the people, not only the people of Puebla or the foreigners who come to study, it took more than ten years to react. Hypocrites They have always been pyromaniacs, not firefighters.
It is true that the results have not been as expected, as true as the coup and fascist attitude of PRIANRD. The university and feminist movement has been distorted and infiltrated. While Morena continues to open flanks such as Huejotzingo as Udlap-Consultores or the Secretary of Welfare where senior managers of the UPAEP collaborate, the failure of the 4T will be imminent in Puebla. This also has to know the protesters. Those who led them to question and demand from the State Government are the same as those who have collaborators in the state and municipal public administration. And they don't say anything about the money they charge, if they aren't consistent with 4T, why don't they quit? The university movement, like the country, lacks a civic culture to develop neat institutions and leaderships, so the street, the demonstration, including anarchy are always sought. Universities are controlled by the extreme right and, public ones, are disposable in their perspective. They marched on this occasion together, but the measure of classism and militarism remains the indelible mark of professional careers in the country.
It is noted that Morena was not aware of the challenge involved in governing Mexico, there is also much division and envy. The country is diluted in the midst of the coup d'etat that is intended to be given in the next few days. The turns of life! The same ones who accused teachers, peasants, journalists, indigenous people, normalists, orange, workers, migrants, etc., of “pockets”, when they manifested themselves; Now they want the country to sink into paralysis. The wake-up call is serious and Miguel Barbosa is in the sights of those who disguise themselves as university students to overthrow governors but have been the most faithful avilacamachistas, marinistas and morenovallistas. The fall of the government, as at the time of the democratic helicopter, is not important; the serious thing is to return to an era that in Puebla clings to the oligarchic cacicazgo
March 6, 2020
Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero
https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2020/03/06/Huejotzingo-y-Udlap-Consultores
In the page of Udlap (University of the Americas-Puebla) where the agreements that their different consultancies obtain are shown, there is propaganda regarding the services that Udlap-Consultores provides in government advice and public policies. The data is important because in the aforementioned agreements regarding issues of government, security, culture, health, etc., the case of Huejotzingo and the current mayor as a graduate of the educational institution is mentioned.
In light of the student demonstrations for the events that took place in that municipality that cost the lives of three university students and an Uber driver, what is the meaning of this data? What is the importance between the Huejotzingo agreement and Udlap-Consultores? Perhaps the right thing is to ask: How responsible is Udlap Consultores for the bad public security policies in the municipality?
If one of the elements that stands out in business management is quality, Huejotzingo is a measure to indicate what Udlap-Consultores has. The rector Ernesto Derbez severely questions, if not “daily”, the decisions of the morenista governments at the federal and state level, what is the reason why he does not refer to local governments ?, particularly those that you consultants Advises and shows proudly.
The student demonstrations have made critical accusations accusing inefficiency of the state and capital government in Puebla; However, there is something that students who participate in them should also know to understand if the new governments are directly responsible. During the last ten years, the University Consortium legitimized the abusive morenovallism that dismantled the municipalities in Puebla and did corrupt business at the expense of the public treasury. Crime seized the state because the morenovallist "technocrats" only ruled for a dozen municipalities and forgot about the other 200 that our entity has. Why don't the rectors explain to the students that the abandonment of ten years was what caused the violence? 0, at least, why not take them to demonstrate against the mayor of Huejotzingo and Udlap-Consultants?
Another graduate of Udlap, Antonio Gali, implemented the "Smart Cities" policy approved by the "Think Tank" and the "Targets" of that institution. What did “Smart City” mean in Puebla? Impoverishment. Corruption. There is the failure and the excess of the bike lanes as well as the joke of hydraulic cement. They should explain to young university students that because of such corruption, poverty was generated, low quality of democracy and impunity. Things, by the way, that know how to measure in Udlap. Gali and the IMPLAN of the municipality of Puebla, developed - surely with the advice mentioned above - the best Municipal Development Plan in the world, which they never applied, because Gali left the Interim Governor and Puebla capital was ruled by a usurper who violated the Boards Auxiliaries where crime and violence reached extraordinary levels.
That, and not something else, is what causes death like that of young people at the Carnival of Huejotzingo. An alternating government cannot work wonders. Derbez knows it, there is his book, an editorial, theoretical and practical failure. He advised and was convinced of the megalomaniac who promised to fix everything in fifteen minutes and then legitimized who turned Mexico into a grave of unknown bodies. Have you already forgotten? How many University students killed the Felipe Calderón War? How many university students have murdered the extreme right in Mexico? And this question makes a lot of sense because perhaps the university students should also know the history of the Anticommunist University Front, the Tecos, the Intermarium, the anti-communism and the fervent admiration of Gustavo Díaz Ordaz for the slaughter of October 2, 1968 that the poblano conservatism has ; although, well, the extreme right says that it is not killing because they only killed a score. The membership of the prestigious private universities of Puebla to the Mexican Anti-Communist Federation and the World Anti-Communist League involved killing university students in exchange for CIA dollars. Oh, they got a lot of money! Do they still kill their death squads: Falcons, Wall, Face, Testimony and Hope? Surely.
The student movement in Puebla was manipulated by the entity's more petty and historically oligarchic interests. Even when it is affirmed that the current generations have more information and competences, the truth is that there are truths that are only discovered over time, perhaps the young people will one day realize with those who marched.Critical theory argues that it is always possible to manipulate society, convert man into mass, that is what has happened in Puebla and does not want to speak the truth. If the Businessmen and the Far Right were interested in the life of the people, not only the people of Puebla or the foreigners who come to study, it took more than ten years to react. Hypocrites They have always been pyromaniacs, not firefighters.
It is true that the results have not been as expected, as true as the coup and fascist attitude of PRIANRD. The university and feminist movement has been distorted and infiltrated. While Morena continues to open flanks such as Huejotzingo as Udlap-Consultores or the Secretary of Welfare where senior managers of the UPAEP collaborate, the failure of the 4T will be imminent in Puebla. This also has to know the protesters. Those who led them to question and demand from the State Government are the same as those who have collaborators in the state and municipal public administration. And they don't say anything about the money they charge, if they aren't consistent with 4T, why don't they quit? The university movement, like the country, lacks a civic culture to develop neat institutions and leaderships, so the street, the demonstration, including anarchy are always sought. Universities are controlled by the extreme right and, public ones, are disposable in their perspective. They marched on this occasion together, but the measure of classism and militarism remains the indelible mark of professional careers in the country.
It is noted that Morena was not aware of the challenge involved in governing Mexico, there is also much division and envy. The country is diluted in the midst of the coup d'etat that is intended to be given in the next few days. The turns of life! The same ones who accused teachers, peasants, journalists, indigenous people, normalists, orange, workers, migrants, etc., of “pockets”, when they manifested themselves; Now they want the country to sink into paralysis. The wake-up call is serious and Miguel Barbosa is in the sights of those who disguise themselves as university students to overthrow governors but have been the most faithful avilacamachistas, marinistas and morenovallistas. The fall of the government, as at the time of the democratic helicopter, is not important; the serious thing is to return to an era that in Puebla clings to the oligarchic cacicazgo