LIBRO GRATIS: LA DERECHA MEXICANA EN EL SIGLO XX: AGONÍA, TRANSFORMACIÓN Y SUPERVIVENCIA

DESCARGAR  GRATIS  

El proceso del conservadurismo y derecha en el caso de América Latina, y particularmente México, encuentra una manifestación singular respecto de la experiencia occidental. Para la situación mexicana el caso de Inglaterra y Francia resulta aleccionador. Mientras la experiencia británica implica una evolución donde el cambio político y religioso motiva el gradualismo, para la condición francesa existen posiciones radicales donde cada dimensión ideológica se potencia conforme avanza el tiempo.

LA DERECHA MEXICANA EN EL SIGLO XX

The Mexican right in the twentieth century. Agony, transformation and survival

The Mexican right in the twentieth century. Agony, transformation and survival

Downloadable Book

48. The Mexican Right in the Twentieth Century Agony, Transformation and Survival.

Xóchitl Patricia Campos López, Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero (coordinators)

BUAP

PROFMEX

Montiel & Soriano Editors

257 p.

ISBN 978-607-7512-77-6

Year 2017

The political ideologies are distinguished by displaying nuances that, although they let us know their relativism, allow us to understand the extension and intensity of the categories. The ideological orientation known as the right approaches conservative, religious, order, reactionary, aristocratic, xenophobic, excluding, etc. criteria. But what is the future of the right? How do you think the right? How does it speak? What is its relationship with economic groups? Has it established geopolitical links? What have been its historical manifestations? contemporary ?, Who can be considered right?

The historical speed of a country determines the meaning of its social structure, which makes the Mexican right singular; but necessary reconsideration. Globalization, modernity and the political transition have generated events that force us to reinterpret the right-wing pendulum. The world economic order folds to the right, then, has the Mexican reaction been synchronized or desynchronized? Observing how much the Mexican right has changed will make it possible to formulate a map appropriate to the circumstances.

The text that you, friendly reader, has in your hands, is the product of reflections emerged from the Academic Body "Multidisciplinary Studies of Politics and Law" (BUAPCA-281), and that found echo in academics from different institutions. The objective of the work is to inform, appropriately, of the historical change, the construction of networks and to formulate new indicators to understand the impact and validity of the right.

script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js">

http://www.profmex.org/ciclosytendencias/vinculos/La_Derecha_Mexicana_en_el_Siglo_XX.pdf

Don´t be stupid! Ricardo Anaya is Neoliberal

Don´t be stupid! Ricardo Anaya is Neoliberal
By Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

The apparent conflict between the Mexican ultra-right, the technocracy and the Atlacomulco Group, has as its purpose - and seems to have succeeded - to increase the popularity and level of knowledge of the right presidential candidate. The apparent persecution that was implemented in the finances of Ricardo Anaya will not be able to investigate anything new in the way of doing business that the extreme right practices. If José Antonio Meade and the Atlacomulco Group wanted to affect the Yunque, there are elements more serious than the voracity and corruption characteristic of the political groups in Mexico, all the drama can be condensed in the "Friend Fire" and it seems to have added a few points to the candidate of the PANPRD.
The serious issue is that AMLO and MORENA have been left out of these events. The apparent calm and parsimony of López Obrador is an element that can cost him dearly, such as when he decided not to attend the debates in 2006 or to slow down his campaign in 2012. The dynamism of the oligarchy and the geopolitical powers that govern Mexico is something that should be analyze with great rigor so that the possibility of political change in Mexico is not broken up. For the Mexican far right and the Consortium of Corruption, Anaya is the saving tablet without importing all the crap it contains.
The PRIANRD prophets have used the metaphor of the electoral tiger to discredit popular opposition nationalism; However, the tiger is nothing compared to the African hippopotamus that corruption, drug trafficking and poverty mean.
Morena must understand that the opportunities to accede to the presidency of the republic do not come and go. Staying still will be taken into account by electoral tendencies. Anaya managed to spread his person while Morena has obtained an ambiguous image for both received defector.
For Mexico, the continuity of the neoliberals -technicians, far right, atlacomulcos and chuchos- at the head of the government, implies the perdition, the apocalypse, the precipice. It is not that Mexico can be Venezuela, it is simply about stopping the neoliberal degeneration that has made us reach a Failed State. The Mexican question is worse than the Venezuelan one in subjects like insecurity, feminicide, migration, poverty, disappeared, drug trafficking, etc.
Ricardo Anaya belongs to the Consortium that from the Salinato has taken charge of usurping the political power and depriving the Mexicans of everything they can. Anaya is a member of a Creole, Hispanic, Catholic, ultraconservative, technocratic and white bourgeoisie that has not had any misgivings to expel millions of Mexicans towards emigration, drug trafficking, poverty and corruption.
Juan Carlos Domínguez Virgen developed an academic text and a play to observe the costs of the failed modernization that the corrupt neoliberals have generated. Ricardo Anaya is part of the Meteorists who have destroyed Mexico and its people. It is a great enrichment opportunity to implement Megaprojects to deprive people of their resources, landscape, water, land and sun. Ricardo Anaya and José Antonio Meade, supervised the worst generation of governors, promoted the Death Projects that are privatizing the entire national space. The Spanish transnationals and the Vatican have obtained infinite profits to support and protect these thieves.
Beyond neoliberal corruption, the Consortium does not want to discuss and debate Megaprojects as the New International Airport of Mexico City. Neoliberal despotism can only be compared to the scientism of the Porfiristas. Discussing which modern project is what Mexico wants is fundamental in these political campaigns. The neoliberal project presents cracks in many parts of the world, the societies of the western countries are choosing nationalist leaders who are going to correct macro and micro economic policies to generate justice and promote a new model of Welfare State. Mexico can not be late for history this time.
Ricardo Anaya is not a martyr of PAN's civilization persecuted by the terrible PRI, he is a neoliberal member of the neo-Porfirian consortium that developed the PRIANRD, aspires to a clerical dictatorship and maintains a neoliberalism that foreigners sponsor to plunder Mexico.



Domínguez Virgen, Juan Carlos. Megaprojects failed in Latin America. Ed. Instituto Mora. Mexico, 2015.

Domínguez Virgen, Juan Carlos. The Legend of Mu. Theater play. Mexico, 2016

MORENA. Cultural conservatism in México

Morena. Cultural conservatism in Mexico
Movimiento de Regeneración Nacional

March 1, 2018
https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2018/03/01/Morena-El-conservadurismo-cultural-en-M%C3%A9xico

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

A few days ago on TVunam, Argentine political scientist Flavia Freindenberg used a conceptual category to explain electoral political processes in Latin America. Elections in Chile, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Colombia, Brazil and Mexico are shaping scenarios where economic, political and social circumstances have activated the mechanisms of preservation and social self-defense. This reaction-cultural conservatism-obeys to the simplest characteristics of protection that human groups establish. The groups of these countries are considering serious risks derived from an irresponsible economic globalization. There are social indicators to show the deep damage that the neoliberal model establishes in education, health, gender, human rights and democracy.

The danger of the situation has reached such an extreme that the mechanisms of human protection have been activated, as happens when there is a cataclysm or tragedy. Hence, it is understood that the winning political options are outlined in a repertoire of anti-establishment candidates and representatives of a populist nationalism.

It is true that this context also constitutes the starting point for authoritarian regimes. Several dictators have gained power through democratic elections. However, social structures in Latin America are in a severe process of decomposition and society demands an urgent change. The PRIANRD has made the country a Failed State and, little by little, this reality has become conscious in a large part of the population. The corruption and cynicism of the contemporary political class has overcome the worst epochs in history.

There is no institution that works in present Mexico, it is enough to observe the profile of the national flag on its last anniversary. And the ruling class does not get anything positive. Deception, corruption as well as permanent factionalism generate an aberrant partycracy. Because of the same situation, the Army, the Catholic Church and the universities travel.

Characters representing Protestant Christianity, nationalists, outsiders, non-political trajectories, etc., have begun to generate sympathy and participation of citizens. It is an opportunity and a remarkable risk; but, perhaps, it is a need according to the time that is lived.

The PRIANRD is a danger for Mexico, they are exterminating what is left of the country. Hence, people opt for regime change and rejection of a continuity full of corruption, violence and parasitism.

Anti-systemic, nationalist, conservative and populist coalitions are marking the dynamics of political change in Latin America. Mexico represented the last link of a colonial neoliberalism that became impotent even to maintain order. The political forces are migrating to Morena's coalition not only because of a conservation superlative, the social order has been lost and nobody knows how to restore it. Morena is the name of the Bardo Monster that can redeem or annihilate Mexico.

Spain and Poland needed prudent leaders to promote amnesties, consensus and pacts. The change without rupture that Manuel Camacho Solis maintained from always and that, now, retakes an importance without comparison. The Catholic neoliberal right, like Polish communism and traditionalist Francoism, wafts everywhere. They are not right in anything. They are an example of the worst. By health they must leave and, at the same time, seek regeneration. With everything and the anthropological characteristics of Mexican culture, the political class and its powers have become alien, different, dangerous.

Is Andrés Manuel López Obrador a Revolutionary Conservator? At first it seems that way. It depends on the society that is not transformed into a Francisco I. Madero or Plutarco Elías Calles. It is up to Mexicans to value the republic, secularism, education and institutions that have inherited the blood of virtuous Mexicans. Globalization, Catholicism, the West and neoliberal order, present a historical crisis, each society is leading to safeguard their lives. Cultural conservatism is the ghost that travels the world, an opportunity and a tremendous risk

Anvils (El Yunque) against Reptilians?

Anvils (El Yunque) against Reptilians?

By Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

Ricardo Anaya accused the persecution of the CISEN (Center of Intelligence and National Security) in his campaign, with this he tried to generate the condition of a persecuted by the political system; however, the situation represents no more than a montage to avoid accusations about the clerical corruption of his humanistic businesses. Like him, hundreds of businessmen, manage capitals of the Vatican State to maintain the plundering of Mexico.
The intelligence, national security and defense apparatuses in Mexico are co-opted by right-wing organizations since the end of the Second World War. Antonio Santacruz, representative of the Great Council of the Synarchist OCA, obtained one of the main geopolitical triumphs for the Holy See when it succeeded in opening the revolutionary governments, on the instructions of the United States, to the excellent minorities of the intransigent integral Catholics.
The elitologists who observed the Mexican political system could verify that a large part of the members of the political class was a graduate of the UNAM (National Autonomous University of Mexico). The maximum house of studies has maintained, from always, to the professionals of the National League of Defense of the Religious Freedom that are disguised of multiple catholic youth organizations. Once recovered the economic situation of the Catholic Church in our country by the Reform of Benito Juárez, the Tridentine outpost founded most of the private educational institutions from where, now, the technocracy and the main bureaucratic controls of the government are nourished. The power elite in Mexico has been on the Right for several decades. From this it can be inferred that Mexico has become a palataforma to combat communism from vatican geopolitical projects such as the Intermarium.
But, then, who spies Ricardo Anaya? As indicated by the maxim of common sense: dog does not eat dog; one pig does not smell another pig. Now that the Holy See has defeated the Marxists, Leninists, Stalinists, Gramscians, Republicans, Liberals, Masons and Jews, who is left? Where is Satan? In the Reptilian Alien. At least that is what those who point out the urgency of consecrating "the whole world" to the Bishop of Rome say for the apocalypse to be contained.
Ricardo Anaya, as well as many yunquistas experts in simulating persecution and attacks, know nothing of what it means to be a victim of espionage and persecution. Who wins in conspiring with an institution that has been practicing the Holy Office for two thousand years? To improve his script, he should study the Dirty War in Mexico, the history of the disappeared in Latin America and his colonial period in New Spain, Auschwitz, Katyn, at 43, etc. The Chekas are light years away from Vatican espionage and control.
Ricardo Anaya is an Onésimo Cepeda or Norberto Rivera. Members of the Gachupín Financial Consortium, the Creole oligarchy that owns property and lives in Mexico, the true factory of the poor that has generated the expulsion of 35 million people to the United States. Do these groups support the United States? Have the Mexican slaves supplied the black slaves? The PRIAN is the system that we have had the last fifty years, the great scam that simulated a republic but that, in reality, is a clerofascism at the service of the Holy See and the United States.
The current geopolitics has changed. Donald Trump does not want an NAFTA with Mexico, he does not want more deals with the intransigent integral Catholics that constitute the political and economic class of the country. How long are we going to continue believing the plot of the reptilians and that Manuel Buendía committed suicide?

Rusophobia, anti-Semitism and Mexico

Rusophobia, anti-Semitism and Mexico

http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2018/02/05/rusofobia-antisemitismo-y-mexico/

By Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

What is the reason that the Mexican extreme right seeks to resuscitate the spirit of Canoa and 1968 in the current elections? By accusing Russia of supporting Andrés Manuel López Obrador, are they trying to revive anti-communism, Judeophobia and violence against public universities?

Communism, Jews and the Russian Orthodox Church are elements that provoke conflict for Catholics. The Jewish-Illustrated conspiracy is emphasized, which acquires force when the Pontifical States are lost in 1870, and the Catholic Church blames the enemies Freemasons, enlightened, Jews, communists, liberals, secularizers and scientists. In the great conspiracy against the Church, all the enemies of Catholicism fit and are confused. The fundamentalism and Catholic fundamentalism would then be justified to reconfigure the greatness of the Church. The Holy See built the attacks on Russia from the moment when that country was a space for the survival of Bundism - a socialist Jewish movement - the affirmation of Orthodox Christianity, communism and Islam. One of the geopolitical projects for the protection of the Vatican State was the "Intemarium". The Intermarium was, and is, an anti-Jewish, Russophobic and ultraconservative Catholic project. When the Russian Revolution emerged, this strategy was implemented so that the intransigent integral Catholicism infiltrated governments, universities, civil society, etc., with the purpose of rooting Catholic secret organizations and controlling the status quo.

The animosity of Poland to Russia has infected the Ibero-American countries; nevertheless, the true rejection of Russia is not from Poland but from the Holy See that observes in Russia one of its main historical enemies. The Mexican far right has enunciated its historical attachment to the geopolitical project called Intermarium that coordinated the arrival of Karol Wojtyla as Bishop of Rome.

A few days ago, Poland enacted a law that sanctions the interpretation or indication that can be made between that nation and Nazi collaborationism. The fact constitutes a useless legislature with respect to historical evidences and facts. However; Beyond the Polish responsibility in the Holocaust, the interesting thing is to highlight the way in which anti-Semitism is used as a justification for Russophobia.

Recently, Russia has begun to take a leading role in the definition of global and European geopolitics. Since Vladimir Putin came to power there has been a synchronization between Russia's internal and external policy that seeks to affirm its vital space and zone of influence. The long period of the political group of Vladimir Putin has solved the crises of the USSR, the conflicts with the border areas and has maintained a zone of influence in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Does Russia intend to constitute the Central State of the Baltic Slavic civilization? in the XXI century? How is Vladimir Putin's leadership to lead an elite that coordinates a semi-authoritarian democracy? Is Russia's development a risk for the West? Are there areas of influence for Russia in other civilizations? What is the reason for the emergence of Baltic Slavic identity in the post-communist era? What role does Russia play in the current multipolar scenario? Has it become a democratic, capitalist and liberal nation? Can it return to socialism to promote a new hegemony? What kind of power is Russia now?

Samuel Huntington gives Russia the treatment of a country whose modernity is frustrated or torn; at least, at the end of the 20th century, that's what it seemed. Russia has a Russian modernity, Baltic Slavic, which with greater certainty is attached and which, each time, has a resounding success. Russia supported, a little over a decade, the capitalist democratic neoliberal model; however, he abandoned it and has found himself again with an autochthonous experience of growth and development. This was the world of the future to which Huntington's hypotheses referred: 1) civilizations will develop internally in a radical process of differentiation with the West and 2) the West has to redefine its civilizing values ​​to stop its own decline in a global context where there are more and more actors and competitors.

Although the concept of clash of civilizations has a serious and bizarre impression, the most important thing that the hypotheses of the North American geopolitical singular have is the approach of the challenge that the culture or western civilization presents once the world of the cold war is over. While it is true that cultural differences have always been there, the exhaustion of the bipolar scheme generated many civilizations and central states of the same, emerge with greater strength and sense of geopolitical territoriality.

This is the case of Russia, only with attachment to its cultural identity and nationalism has managed to be reborn after almost collapsing with the end of the USSR. Russia has a global role that competes with the United States and the West in particular, its recovery has defeated the image of a poor, authoritarian and weak country. At the turn of the 21st century, Russia rejected Westernization and returned to the path of its own identity. The stage has followed, partially, the picture that appeared Huntington. Russia can not be omitted from international politics in Eastern Europe, Asia and the Middle East. It can not be said that he has regained the power that the USSR had; but it is not a minor actor in current geopolitics either. Its foreign policy coincides more and more with its national interest and is prepared militarily and professionally.

The recent leadership of Russia, China and India have robbed the United States of importance in global control. However, they do not seek the total armed conflict and, much less, the conquest of the world. The multipolar equilibrium generates a cold war where more actors intervene that, certainly, adopt the cautious and latent patterns of contention. Armed conflicts are represented in areas where diplomacy is concluded and the interests of the powers determine the use of force.

Modernizing globalization is no longer the heritage of Western culture. The West is in crisis for a blind neoliberalism represented in the Culture of Davos and the cultural metastasis that generates its consumerism. The abandonment of the United States to Mexico implies the opportunity for identity recovery and social reengineering. The Mexican neoliberals, the extreme right and the national bourgeoisie are condemned by the old capitalist superpower; they are ineffective, corrupt, murderous, retrograde and cretinous.

Should Mexico continue under the tutelage of the Holy See and projects such as the Intermarium? Should Mexico fear Russia? Of course not.

A large part of the macro-projects and strategic policies that our country has lost, owe their failure to the belief that you can only work with the allies of Catholic Christendom. There are the results: impunity, corruption, poverty and underdevelopment. Russia, and the world, are opportunities that globalization and modernity offer to our environment. It is a pity that El Yunque continues believing that Mexicans are programmed in code "Canoa 1968". The neoliberal Hispanic Catholic oligarchy can no longer hide its parasitism, the attacks on Russia are proof of its lamentable intellectual and moral capacity: the Americans no longer want them or of servitude. The closure of the North American president to our country, must be the impulse to look for new allies, technologies, infrastructure, markets, exchanges; in short, the world.

Mexico must fear the consecration of the Anvil that the Holy See promotes in the PRIANRD and, unfortunately, also in MORENA.

Yunque (Anvil): the priista and nazi Smurf

Yunque (Anvil): the priista and nazi Smurf
http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2018/01/26/yunque-el-pitufo-priista-y-nazi/

By Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

A few days ago, Mario Alberto Mejía exposed in his columns the particularity of the political analysis that distinguishes the members of the Anvil. While it is true that certain prospects of the subjects in question cause hilarity, it is also true that these arguments must be taken seriously and intelligently despite the alleged errors they contain.
It is strange that reptilian, illuminati, gay or zombie conspiracies are taken seriously; but do not observe - in truth - the power exerted by a terrorist organization - similar in capacity to the Islamic State - as is the Yunque (Anvil) whose power extends in Latin America and other latitudes.
The Anvil (El Yunque) is in the antechamber of power in Mexico, it has always been. Since the end of the Second World War, the United States and the Holy See established a fascist consensus that aimed to destroy the Soviet Union. Even though America came to possess the most powerful weapons and army in the world, the Vatican State developed the millimeter structure to inhibit any progressive, social, liberal or democratic thinking that would put American hegemony at risk. The prostitute of Babylon received her service well. The governments where catholicity prevailed were infiltrated and Mexico is a singular case. Concordats and patronages generalize poverty to maintain the pageantry of the ecclesiastical hierarchy and their children. Thus Ibero-America was the safeguard of thousands of Nazis. In Mexico and, particularly in Puebla, Nazism runs without reserve.
The old revolutionary guard quietly observed the administration of Manuel Ávila Camacho, with regret he understood that the Army, the intelligence apparatuses and the public administration should be shared with the elites of uncompromising integral Catholicism, until they were absorbed by the papists. The moment of splendor is constituted by the government of Gustavo Díaz Ordaz -avilacamachista as well-, where white guards, death squads and fascist radicals flourish. Because of their anti-communism, they assassinate with impunity peasants, students, workers, women and even religious . The dirty war and the infiltration of the extreme right into the intelligence of the Mexican State is a fundamental chapter that is needed to explain the authoritarianism in our political system.
The integration of the Anvil (Yunque) and the Morenovallismo constitutes a legitimation to the previous state of things. In Puebla there was neither Reformation, nor Revolution, nor Cardenismo, nor Alternation. The old clerical Porfirian regime remains buoyant and the Lombardo Toledano or Henriquez Ureña, must flee hidden under penalty that the members of Yunque, like Testimony and Hope (or another of the thousands of organizations of the Anvil) try to kill. Avilacamachismo Poblano only reedited the old oligarchic structures that can not live without Hernán Cortés. Puebla indebted, prey of the huachicoleros, full of femicides, kidnapped by insecurity, poor and informal, is a product of the union between Moreno Valle and Yunque.
There is nothing to laugh at the political analysts of the Anvil, its candidates or members. The political class, in general, does not have the courage to confront them. The geopolitical condition is imposed: while North America fears socialism, the Catholic extreme right will have legitimacy to handle the States. Hence the capacity for violence, disorder, instability and crime that generates clerofascism to obtain inclusion in governments. What is important to say to the United States, as well as to Mexican society, is that, as long as the extreme right remains in power, social pathologies will continue and the cost increases each period. Morelos, Guanajuato, Puebla, Tamaulipas and Veracruz constitute a small sample.
If Moreno Valle is so powerful, what is the need for El Yunque? if the morenovallismo has to contribute to the vote of the PRIist-panista Meade Kuribreña, is also the Yunque a guest to fulfill the mission or the official candidate of the PRIANRD is Ricardo Anaya? Even Morena has had to lobby the extreme right through the black Jesuitism of social Catholicism. There are no reasons to laugh. Mexico is a tragedy, a sick despair of Hispanic catholicity.