Far-right: CIA agents
Diego Martin Velázquez Caballero
The elections that take place this year have as a paradigm the clash between two forms of Mexican time. 1. The construction of a form of authoritarian obedience and 2. Democratic anarchism.
In the illiberal Ibero-American Catholic culture, strong leaders are indispensable, democracy generates conflicts that public morality does not know how to resolve. Ibero-America is distinguished by a deep sense of chaos. Informality and immorality are imposed on the character of the peoples and only in exceptional or minute cases, some are distinguished by honesty. Democracy is bad for the Latin American peoples, their elites do not have the capacity to govern with quality. Nor does a civic condition survive in the largest minority reached by the government.
Phenomena like Franco, the PRI, Perón, Pinochet, Ortega, Somoza, Castro, etc; they are part of a tradition that values strength more than freedom. From a distance, they seem neither totalitarianisms, nor fascisms, nor anything, just plain authoritarianisms that managed to govern a numerous factionalism.
The nauseating transfuguismo that is experienced in all political parties and tendencies is a sign of the little value that freedom has in the political class, there are few leaders with principles, almost none. The decomposition of the Mexican political system did not finish showing itself in the EPN administration, it still reaches the current one and continues to gangrene it.
How many Lily Téllez are going to come to Morena this time? Transfuguism in Spain or Latin America is distinguished by its legislative vein and, perhaps, that is necessary for the government to disabuse itself of the limits and traps that its allies are going to set. This is the case of the characters who reach the seat for a party and then decide to sell their vote to the highest bidder. The recent experiences of Guatemala, Peru, Honduras and some historical ones such as Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Brazil, are an example of the poisoning that these practices solve in the political apparatus. A severe conflict looms in Mexico between the Legislative and Executive Power.
Some years ago there was mention of politicians in the style "Manuel Camacho Solís" and the abrupt changes that his attitude caused in the evolution of the Mexican political system. What are politicians like "Lily Téllez" going to provoke now?
During the PRIato the possibilities of a coup d'état or foreign intervention were reduced due to the internal discipline that the Official Party kept. The cost was represented by a gigantic corruption that was administered from the State. That is the problem that Morena has now.
The similes between Carlos Salinas de Gortari and Andrés Manuel López Obrador remain constant. When George Bush - father - did not win reelection, the Salinas neoliberal project began its permanent decline and now the same can happen with Q4. We have argued that Mexico does better when the Republicans rule in the US.
If Bush - father - had won the elections for a second presidential term, perhaps Colosio would not have died, CSG would have led the WTO and, probably also, would have already governed Mexico again, the 1995 economic crisis would not have occurred and, still, the Solidarity Party would maintain power under a social liberal neo-corporatism. Everything failed. Salinas went from being the Mexican Mustafa Kemal Ataturk to a vile oligarchic thief, Mexico had an emigration of close to 10 million people (which increased seriously with drug trafficking) and society had to face subsidizing the financial dilemma of the new liberalism economic. Not to mention the lack of control and ungovernability that began to live in the nation.
4T begins to experience an anticipated scenario of this crisis regularly caused by the Democratic party. Probably your dolphin will not be sabotaged, it will not be necessary if the relationship with the Legislative Power becomes complicated. While Salinas regained a legislative majority and there was even speculation about a re-election that the social group seriously considered, it is risky to assume that AMLO will have a peaceful relationship with the Legislative Power.
Salinas imitated Lázaro Cárdenas in the strategy of generating governance. And it was not enough. López Obrador does not control the governors - not to say that each one misgoverns in the most radical way possible on a scale that ranges from extreme crime to cave-dwelling barbarism. However, Lázaro Cárdenas did not manage to transcend beyond his six-year term, Salinas became a dark villain and the errors of the 4T add up and add up. Morenoism is becoming more and more like the 2nd Spanish Republic that did everything so that Falangism came to power.
The severe adjustments that financial capitalism will implement in the post-pandemic world are going to be terrible in the Mexican case: emigration, financial circuses, crime, ungovernability, etc .; It is the democratic recipe for good neighborliness between Mexico and the United States. Morena's internal groups have shown a more than damaging particularism, the capacity for harm, a failed intelligence, that distinguishes fools. Who told progressive groups that good government is one that only thinks about homosexuals, abortionists and vegan bicycle riders? Good government is the one that governs for everyone. Does the nexus between feminism and conservatism show us that the far-right turncoat learned to overtake the left?
The coup does not have to be military, or even abrupt. At the right time, the Legislative can cause chaos and a permanent blockade of the Executive. Joe Biden (the CIA and the DEA) are not going to allow it to govern. A relationship like that of José López Portillo and Jimmy Carter is envisioned and, as soon as we remember ……, we were screwed.
After World War II, the Mexican extreme right became an employee of the CIA. The fight against communism earned them influence, conspiracies, business; even power. However, just as Spain wonders what being a Catholic has served it, Latin America should question what being pro-Yankee has served it. North America subsists thanks to the mafia republic that is Mexico, but the cost is paid from here.
Vladimir Putin has built a legal scaffolding to guarantee impunity and try to preserve power, at least until 2036. The Russian leader understands that with the Democrats he can end up like Gaddafi or Osama, the serious scenario for his people also influences so that China distance itself from US interventionism.
The ultra-right involves infiltrating several dozen candidates for the legislative branch to change jackets - like Lily Téllez - at the right time. The second half of the six-year term does not show a smooth relationship between AMLO and the legislative representatives of the upper and lower houses. The alliances that MORENA has established with conservative politicians show sterile results.
Alfonso Reyes, according to Gabriel Zaid, pointed out how harmful the subordination to the United States by Mexican politicians would be; the best thing would be to hand over the country to them so that once and for all they try to govern it seriously.