A mexican standoff in the anglo saxon spirit
Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero
Rubén Darío means the United States as Alexander Nabucodonosor. Vladimir Putin updates the poetry of the sublime Nicaraguan by equating Yankee imperialism with the senile insanity of the Babylonian. The US hegemony has entered a labyrinth with no way out where whoever pays no longer commands, now they have to pay so that they do not kill them.
When the situation in our country and in North America is analyzed, it seems that we are locked in a labyrinth with no solution. The relationship between Mexico and the United States is a mystery that only the universe solves and of which, surely, no one is fully satisfied.
This situation had already occurred in the Mexican past of the Second French Intervention and the Cristero War. Nobody wins. The United States is not going to allow Mexico to consolidate itself as a sovereign and independent state, but neither will it leave the territory up for grabs for some important enemy to take over. That is why it generates division and supports all political forces. The struggle for power in Mexico is a tie with the taste of defeat, where none of the cliques has the option to crush the others completely.
But the Mexican dilemma is not typical of Mexico alone, this situation of lock ties is a practice of the United States for many societies and groups, especially in the financing of terrorism. A unique case is represented by the dictatorship of Francisco Franco in Spain, forced to coexist with various opposition forces that, at the same time, were protected by the United States. Franco was supported by the Nazis, English and Americans, so that by establishing himself in power he managed to clean up politics and the economy; and they tried to eliminate him when his hegemony was no longer convenient for them. However, the generalissimo stood up to the end and built a balance that kept Francoism as a family under the new pact that, in any case, placed Spain as subordinate to Western geopolitics. The Anglo-Saxons are experts in speculating and creating these lockdown scenarios so that they are the faithful of the balance and the strict option.
The colonies of England always served to destabilize regions and expand Anglo-Saxon rule. Today, that heritage for the United States continues to constitute the fault zones that impede the evolution of human, historical, and cultural geography. Anglo-Saxon culture seems willing to extinguish humanity so that they survive.
However, dilemmas such as the Mexican one occur or you lock up where there is no possibility of further speculation. North America knows that if Mexico falls, they fall. And this knowledge serves as an instrumental force for all parties. The chaos of Mexico will always have a limit, the one that the United States supports.
England is an island that can afford to allow Russia and Germany to dominate the European continent momentarily, in the future it will antagonize them at all costs, as happened in the First and Second World Wars.
The United States is not an island, it cannot be configured as Iceland, Australia or New Zealand; who have the sea to separate the different. The United States has a high probability of experiencing a process like that of the Republic of South Africa that implied integration and sharing of power with different racial populations. As long as the United States does not understand the interaction and continentality that it must necessarily live, it will be condemned to the Mexican dilemma. The United States will harm Mexico as support for the Mexican lumpenproletariat to reach its territory.
The current federal administration in Mexico has tried to go the route of the Keynesian measures that surely inspired Brexit. Indeed, neoliberalism has deeply affected society, it has suffered the enormous costs of capitalism and, for that reason, it is just trying to get out of a deep spiral of corruption, violence and poverty. England have questioned Amlo, but there is likely more similarity between López Obrador and Boris Johnson. England has also laid out an anti-globalization path for quite some time. Amlo has been consistent with this perspective that questions the free market. England agrees with this strategy, they have preferred not to cooperate more with the financing of the common Europe and this is proof that the criticisms of neoliberalism are correct. England found itself with an excess of contributions towards the commercial unit with Europe and, wisely, decided to abandon it. It is not a society that suits life and the Anglo-Saxon project. England has also chosen to slow down the capitalism of globalization.
