¿Corruption or dispersion? Device poverty in Mexico
Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero
The results on the social question in the country incite debate on development and backwardness. Poverty is advancing rapidly and implementers of public policies are lost in finding the formula that, at least, can effectively raise the issue.
Governments of all levels of government consider making it necessary to carry out social policy. And, if observed regularly, federal, state and municipal structures are there, seem to do their job. There are multitude of welfare programs for almost anyone. What's wrong then?
Lately it has begun to reinterpret the concept of overlay dispersion and poverty. This has served to justify the failures of government handouts to point out that communities in extreme poverty resulting from its remote and distant from urban centers or municipal capitals location. This, to say the bureaucracy responsible conditions access to programs and services provided by public institutions. This argument has been used to implement policies that are grounded in the displacement of indigenous groups and peasants to urban development centers. One of these was executed by Juan Sabines in Chiapas and had the name of Rural Cities. The project received support and advice from international bodies like the United Nations so that the local constitution did endorse the Millennium Development Goals. It is undeniable that the project contains an admirable rationality and planning; however, as anthropologists and social scientists ahead of that entity and the country, the Rural Cities were a failure that continues putting Chiapas behind development. The enlightened despotism was accompanied by a lack of transparency and responsible management in the construction of rural towns.
In Chiapas held a total dispossession, volleys of corruption and human rights violation impersonating one, at least, interesting modernizing model. The oligarchy that took over the project is responsible for the recent triumph of the Green Party in that entity. Social change is not made, not the interest of beneficiaries in project implementation and poverty has worsened considered. Of course, any public and private responsibility has been blamed outside of academic work.
The corruption that is done in the name of social policy concerns governments and solidarity movements. Carlos Salinas de Gortari tried to clear it through the National Solidarity Program, a social policy that managed public resources to carry most of the country's municipalities as well as of the most studied, and, unfortunately, could not avoid filled with mismanagement. Precisely Chiapas and the Zapatista Army of National Liberation demonstrated to society and the world that modernization Salinas was full of perversions.
Corruption is a major obstacle to social development in Mexico and, given its strong ability, there are few options. Exemplarily punish corrupt becomes an endless task, another choice is to achieve that while slow participatory model may invalidate abusive actors and achieve inclusion of beneficiaries in a collaborative and balances logic.
Brazilian technology of participatory budgeting has been widely cited as a mechanism that would not only have positive effects on the social issue but also as a tool of political culture. Participation allows the passage of distrust the government jointly responsible for corruption and transparency.
Combating the spread remains the focus of social policy pursued in different entities now with cheaper and ineffective models as Integrators Service Centres (CIS) or Units of Basic Services (USB) executed, especially in southern Mexico. A defect that accompanied the Rural Cities now have to add the conflict with Article 115 of the Constitution and oligarchization process associated with neo-extractivism.
The modernization accompanied by corruption will always be a combination that produces failure. Participation and organization should be prospective that must be taken seriously in the fight against poverty. Avoid the influence of people on policies that affect them evade governance and democracy, it is behavior that will result in poverty and corruption.
A State which waives such corrective intervention in the economy, encourages inequality and conflict. This is the result of decades of false liberalism that have lived in Mexico. Bosch Jaime Ros has insisted on recovering the Mexican State and then save development and growth. Maybe when society avoid corrupt disguised modernizers also find an effective strategy against poverty.
- See more at: http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2015/07/28/corrupcion-o-dispersion-dispositivo-de-la-pobreza-en-mexico/#sthash.yKFKsOWU.dpuf
Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero
The results on the social question in the country incite debate on development and backwardness. Poverty is advancing rapidly and implementers of public policies are lost in finding the formula that, at least, can effectively raise the issue.
Governments of all levels of government consider making it necessary to carry out social policy. And, if observed regularly, federal, state and municipal structures are there, seem to do their job. There are multitude of welfare programs for almost anyone. What's wrong then?
Lately it has begun to reinterpret the concept of overlay dispersion and poverty. This has served to justify the failures of government handouts to point out that communities in extreme poverty resulting from its remote and distant from urban centers or municipal capitals location. This, to say the bureaucracy responsible conditions access to programs and services provided by public institutions. This argument has been used to implement policies that are grounded in the displacement of indigenous groups and peasants to urban development centers. One of these was executed by Juan Sabines in Chiapas and had the name of Rural Cities. The project received support and advice from international bodies like the United Nations so that the local constitution did endorse the Millennium Development Goals. It is undeniable that the project contains an admirable rationality and planning; however, as anthropologists and social scientists ahead of that entity and the country, the Rural Cities were a failure that continues putting Chiapas behind development. The enlightened despotism was accompanied by a lack of transparency and responsible management in the construction of rural towns.
In Chiapas held a total dispossession, volleys of corruption and human rights violation impersonating one, at least, interesting modernizing model. The oligarchy that took over the project is responsible for the recent triumph of the Green Party in that entity. Social change is not made, not the interest of beneficiaries in project implementation and poverty has worsened considered. Of course, any public and private responsibility has been blamed outside of academic work.
The corruption that is done in the name of social policy concerns governments and solidarity movements. Carlos Salinas de Gortari tried to clear it through the National Solidarity Program, a social policy that managed public resources to carry most of the country's municipalities as well as of the most studied, and, unfortunately, could not avoid filled with mismanagement. Precisely Chiapas and the Zapatista Army of National Liberation demonstrated to society and the world that modernization Salinas was full of perversions.
Corruption is a major obstacle to social development in Mexico and, given its strong ability, there are few options. Exemplarily punish corrupt becomes an endless task, another choice is to achieve that while slow participatory model may invalidate abusive actors and achieve inclusion of beneficiaries in a collaborative and balances logic.
Brazilian technology of participatory budgeting has been widely cited as a mechanism that would not only have positive effects on the social issue but also as a tool of political culture. Participation allows the passage of distrust the government jointly responsible for corruption and transparency.
Combating the spread remains the focus of social policy pursued in different entities now with cheaper and ineffective models as Integrators Service Centres (CIS) or Units of Basic Services (USB) executed, especially in southern Mexico. A defect that accompanied the Rural Cities now have to add the conflict with Article 115 of the Constitution and oligarchization process associated with neo-extractivism.
The modernization accompanied by corruption will always be a combination that produces failure. Participation and organization should be prospective that must be taken seriously in the fight against poverty. Avoid the influence of people on policies that affect them evade governance and democracy, it is behavior that will result in poverty and corruption.
A State which waives such corrective intervention in the economy, encourages inequality and conflict. This is the result of decades of false liberalism that have lived in Mexico. Bosch Jaime Ros has insisted on recovering the Mexican State and then save development and growth. Maybe when society avoid corrupt disguised modernizers also find an effective strategy against poverty.
- See more at: http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2015/07/28/corrupcion-o-dispersion-dispositivo-de-la-pobreza-en-mexico/#sthash.yKFKsOWU.dpuf