MORENA. Cultural conservatism in México

Morena. Cultural conservatism in Mexico
Movimiento de Regeneración Nacional

March 1, 2018
https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2018/03/01/Morena-El-conservadurismo-cultural-en-M%C3%A9xico

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

A few days ago on TVunam, Argentine political scientist Flavia Freindenberg used a conceptual category to explain electoral political processes in Latin America. Elections in Chile, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Colombia, Brazil and Mexico are shaping scenarios where economic, political and social circumstances have activated the mechanisms of preservation and social self-defense. This reaction-cultural conservatism-obeys to the simplest characteristics of protection that human groups establish. The groups of these countries are considering serious risks derived from an irresponsible economic globalization. There are social indicators to show the deep damage that the neoliberal model establishes in education, health, gender, human rights and democracy.

The danger of the situation has reached such an extreme that the mechanisms of human protection have been activated, as happens when there is a cataclysm or tragedy. Hence, it is understood that the winning political options are outlined in a repertoire of anti-establishment candidates and representatives of a populist nationalism.

It is true that this context also constitutes the starting point for authoritarian regimes. Several dictators have gained power through democratic elections. However, social structures in Latin America are in a severe process of decomposition and society demands an urgent change. The PRIANRD has made the country a Failed State and, little by little, this reality has become conscious in a large part of the population. The corruption and cynicism of the contemporary political class has overcome the worst epochs in history.

There is no institution that works in present Mexico, it is enough to observe the profile of the national flag on its last anniversary. And the ruling class does not get anything positive. Deception, corruption as well as permanent factionalism generate an aberrant partycracy. Because of the same situation, the Army, the Catholic Church and the universities travel.

Characters representing Protestant Christianity, nationalists, outsiders, non-political trajectories, etc., have begun to generate sympathy and participation of citizens. It is an opportunity and a remarkable risk; but, perhaps, it is a need according to the time that is lived.

The PRIANRD is a danger for Mexico, they are exterminating what is left of the country. Hence, people opt for regime change and rejection of a continuity full of corruption, violence and parasitism.

Anti-systemic, nationalist, conservative and populist coalitions are marking the dynamics of political change in Latin America. Mexico represented the last link of a colonial neoliberalism that became impotent even to maintain order. The political forces are migrating to Morena's coalition not only because of a conservation superlative, the social order has been lost and nobody knows how to restore it. Morena is the name of the Bardo Monster that can redeem or annihilate Mexico.

Spain and Poland needed prudent leaders to promote amnesties, consensus and pacts. The change without rupture that Manuel Camacho Solis maintained from always and that, now, retakes an importance without comparison. The Catholic neoliberal right, like Polish communism and traditionalist Francoism, wafts everywhere. They are not right in anything. They are an example of the worst. By health they must leave and, at the same time, seek regeneration. With everything and the anthropological characteristics of Mexican culture, the political class and its powers have become alien, different, dangerous.

Is Andrés Manuel López Obrador a Revolutionary Conservator? At first it seems that way. It depends on the society that is not transformed into a Francisco I. Madero or Plutarco Elías Calles. It is up to Mexicans to value the republic, secularism, education and institutions that have inherited the blood of virtuous Mexicans. Globalization, Catholicism, the West and neoliberal order, present a historical crisis, each society is leading to safeguard their lives. Cultural conservatism is the ghost that travels the world, an opportunity and a tremendous risk

Anvils (El Yunque) against Reptilians?

Anvils (El Yunque) against Reptilians?

By Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

Ricardo Anaya accused the persecution of the CISEN (Center of Intelligence and National Security) in his campaign, with this he tried to generate the condition of a persecuted by the political system; however, the situation represents no more than a montage to avoid accusations about the clerical corruption of his humanistic businesses. Like him, hundreds of businessmen, manage capitals of the Vatican State to maintain the plundering of Mexico.
The intelligence, national security and defense apparatuses in Mexico are co-opted by right-wing organizations since the end of the Second World War. Antonio Santacruz, representative of the Great Council of the Synarchist OCA, obtained one of the main geopolitical triumphs for the Holy See when it succeeded in opening the revolutionary governments, on the instructions of the United States, to the excellent minorities of the intransigent integral Catholics.
The elitologists who observed the Mexican political system could verify that a large part of the members of the political class was a graduate of the UNAM (National Autonomous University of Mexico). The maximum house of studies has maintained, from always, to the professionals of the National League of Defense of the Religious Freedom that are disguised of multiple catholic youth organizations. Once recovered the economic situation of the Catholic Church in our country by the Reform of Benito Juárez, the Tridentine outpost founded most of the private educational institutions from where, now, the technocracy and the main bureaucratic controls of the government are nourished. The power elite in Mexico has been on the Right for several decades. From this it can be inferred that Mexico has become a palataforma to combat communism from vatican geopolitical projects such as the Intermarium.
But, then, who spies Ricardo Anaya? As indicated by the maxim of common sense: dog does not eat dog; one pig does not smell another pig. Now that the Holy See has defeated the Marxists, Leninists, Stalinists, Gramscians, Republicans, Liberals, Masons and Jews, who is left? Where is Satan? In the Reptilian Alien. At least that is what those who point out the urgency of consecrating "the whole world" to the Bishop of Rome say for the apocalypse to be contained.
Ricardo Anaya, as well as many yunquistas experts in simulating persecution and attacks, know nothing of what it means to be a victim of espionage and persecution. Who wins in conspiring with an institution that has been practicing the Holy Office for two thousand years? To improve his script, he should study the Dirty War in Mexico, the history of the disappeared in Latin America and his colonial period in New Spain, Auschwitz, Katyn, at 43, etc. The Chekas are light years away from Vatican espionage and control.
Ricardo Anaya is an Onésimo Cepeda or Norberto Rivera. Members of the Gachupín Financial Consortium, the Creole oligarchy that owns property and lives in Mexico, the true factory of the poor that has generated the expulsion of 35 million people to the United States. Do these groups support the United States? Have the Mexican slaves supplied the black slaves? The PRIAN is the system that we have had the last fifty years, the great scam that simulated a republic but that, in reality, is a clerofascism at the service of the Holy See and the United States.
The current geopolitics has changed. Donald Trump does not want an NAFTA with Mexico, he does not want more deals with the intransigent integral Catholics that constitute the political and economic class of the country. How long are we going to continue believing the plot of the reptilians and that Manuel Buendía committed suicide?

Rusophobia, anti-Semitism and Mexico

Rusophobia, anti-Semitism and Mexico

http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2018/02/05/rusofobia-antisemitismo-y-mexico/

By Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

What is the reason that the Mexican extreme right seeks to resuscitate the spirit of Canoa and 1968 in the current elections? By accusing Russia of supporting Andrés Manuel López Obrador, are they trying to revive anti-communism, Judeophobia and violence against public universities?

Communism, Jews and the Russian Orthodox Church are elements that provoke conflict for Catholics. The Jewish-Illustrated conspiracy is emphasized, which acquires force when the Pontifical States are lost in 1870, and the Catholic Church blames the enemies Freemasons, enlightened, Jews, communists, liberals, secularizers and scientists. In the great conspiracy against the Church, all the enemies of Catholicism fit and are confused. The fundamentalism and Catholic fundamentalism would then be justified to reconfigure the greatness of the Church. The Holy See built the attacks on Russia from the moment when that country was a space for the survival of Bundism - a socialist Jewish movement - the affirmation of Orthodox Christianity, communism and Islam. One of the geopolitical projects for the protection of the Vatican State was the "Intemarium". The Intermarium was, and is, an anti-Jewish, Russophobic and ultraconservative Catholic project. When the Russian Revolution emerged, this strategy was implemented so that the intransigent integral Catholicism infiltrated governments, universities, civil society, etc., with the purpose of rooting Catholic secret organizations and controlling the status quo.

The animosity of Poland to Russia has infected the Ibero-American countries; nevertheless, the true rejection of Russia is not from Poland but from the Holy See that observes in Russia one of its main historical enemies. The Mexican far right has enunciated its historical attachment to the geopolitical project called Intermarium that coordinated the arrival of Karol Wojtyla as Bishop of Rome.

A few days ago, Poland enacted a law that sanctions the interpretation or indication that can be made between that nation and Nazi collaborationism. The fact constitutes a useless legislature with respect to historical evidences and facts. However; Beyond the Polish responsibility in the Holocaust, the interesting thing is to highlight the way in which anti-Semitism is used as a justification for Russophobia.

Recently, Russia has begun to take a leading role in the definition of global and European geopolitics. Since Vladimir Putin came to power there has been a synchronization between Russia's internal and external policy that seeks to affirm its vital space and zone of influence. The long period of the political group of Vladimir Putin has solved the crises of the USSR, the conflicts with the border areas and has maintained a zone of influence in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Does Russia intend to constitute the Central State of the Baltic Slavic civilization? in the XXI century? How is Vladimir Putin's leadership to lead an elite that coordinates a semi-authoritarian democracy? Is Russia's development a risk for the West? Are there areas of influence for Russia in other civilizations? What is the reason for the emergence of Baltic Slavic identity in the post-communist era? What role does Russia play in the current multipolar scenario? Has it become a democratic, capitalist and liberal nation? Can it return to socialism to promote a new hegemony? What kind of power is Russia now?

Samuel Huntington gives Russia the treatment of a country whose modernity is frustrated or torn; at least, at the end of the 20th century, that's what it seemed. Russia has a Russian modernity, Baltic Slavic, which with greater certainty is attached and which, each time, has a resounding success. Russia supported, a little over a decade, the capitalist democratic neoliberal model; however, he abandoned it and has found himself again with an autochthonous experience of growth and development. This was the world of the future to which Huntington's hypotheses referred: 1) civilizations will develop internally in a radical process of differentiation with the West and 2) the West has to redefine its civilizing values ​​to stop its own decline in a global context where there are more and more actors and competitors.

Although the concept of clash of civilizations has a serious and bizarre impression, the most important thing that the hypotheses of the North American geopolitical singular have is the approach of the challenge that the culture or western civilization presents once the world of the cold war is over. While it is true that cultural differences have always been there, the exhaustion of the bipolar scheme generated many civilizations and central states of the same, emerge with greater strength and sense of geopolitical territoriality.

This is the case of Russia, only with attachment to its cultural identity and nationalism has managed to be reborn after almost collapsing with the end of the USSR. Russia has a global role that competes with the United States and the West in particular, its recovery has defeated the image of a poor, authoritarian and weak country. At the turn of the 21st century, Russia rejected Westernization and returned to the path of its own identity. The stage has followed, partially, the picture that appeared Huntington. Russia can not be omitted from international politics in Eastern Europe, Asia and the Middle East. It can not be said that he has regained the power that the USSR had; but it is not a minor actor in current geopolitics either. Its foreign policy coincides more and more with its national interest and is prepared militarily and professionally.

The recent leadership of Russia, China and India have robbed the United States of importance in global control. However, they do not seek the total armed conflict and, much less, the conquest of the world. The multipolar equilibrium generates a cold war where more actors intervene that, certainly, adopt the cautious and latent patterns of contention. Armed conflicts are represented in areas where diplomacy is concluded and the interests of the powers determine the use of force.

Modernizing globalization is no longer the heritage of Western culture. The West is in crisis for a blind neoliberalism represented in the Culture of Davos and the cultural metastasis that generates its consumerism. The abandonment of the United States to Mexico implies the opportunity for identity recovery and social reengineering. The Mexican neoliberals, the extreme right and the national bourgeoisie are condemned by the old capitalist superpower; they are ineffective, corrupt, murderous, retrograde and cretinous.

Should Mexico continue under the tutelage of the Holy See and projects such as the Intermarium? Should Mexico fear Russia? Of course not.

A large part of the macro-projects and strategic policies that our country has lost, owe their failure to the belief that you can only work with the allies of Catholic Christendom. There are the results: impunity, corruption, poverty and underdevelopment. Russia, and the world, are opportunities that globalization and modernity offer to our environment. It is a pity that El Yunque continues believing that Mexicans are programmed in code "Canoa 1968". The neoliberal Hispanic Catholic oligarchy can no longer hide its parasitism, the attacks on Russia are proof of its lamentable intellectual and moral capacity: the Americans no longer want them or of servitude. The closure of the North American president to our country, must be the impulse to look for new allies, technologies, infrastructure, markets, exchanges; in short, the world.

Mexico must fear the consecration of the Anvil that the Holy See promotes in the PRIANRD and, unfortunately, also in MORENA.

Yunque (Anvil): the priista and nazi Smurf

Yunque (Anvil): the priista and nazi Smurf
http://quoruminformativo.com.mx/index.php/2018/01/26/yunque-el-pitufo-priista-y-nazi/

By Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

A few days ago, Mario Alberto Mejía exposed in his columns the particularity of the political analysis that distinguishes the members of the Anvil. While it is true that certain prospects of the subjects in question cause hilarity, it is also true that these arguments must be taken seriously and intelligently despite the alleged errors they contain.
It is strange that reptilian, illuminati, gay or zombie conspiracies are taken seriously; but do not observe - in truth - the power exerted by a terrorist organization - similar in capacity to the Islamic State - as is the Yunque (Anvil) whose power extends in Latin America and other latitudes.
The Anvil (El Yunque) is in the antechamber of power in Mexico, it has always been. Since the end of the Second World War, the United States and the Holy See established a fascist consensus that aimed to destroy the Soviet Union. Even though America came to possess the most powerful weapons and army in the world, the Vatican State developed the millimeter structure to inhibit any progressive, social, liberal or democratic thinking that would put American hegemony at risk. The prostitute of Babylon received her service well. The governments where catholicity prevailed were infiltrated and Mexico is a singular case. Concordats and patronages generalize poverty to maintain the pageantry of the ecclesiastical hierarchy and their children. Thus Ibero-America was the safeguard of thousands of Nazis. In Mexico and, particularly in Puebla, Nazism runs without reserve.
The old revolutionary guard quietly observed the administration of Manuel Ávila Camacho, with regret he understood that the Army, the intelligence apparatuses and the public administration should be shared with the elites of uncompromising integral Catholicism, until they were absorbed by the papists. The moment of splendor is constituted by the government of Gustavo Díaz Ordaz -avilacamachista as well-, where white guards, death squads and fascist radicals flourish. Because of their anti-communism, they assassinate with impunity peasants, students, workers, women and even religious . The dirty war and the infiltration of the extreme right into the intelligence of the Mexican State is a fundamental chapter that is needed to explain the authoritarianism in our political system.
The integration of the Anvil (Yunque) and the Morenovallismo constitutes a legitimation to the previous state of things. In Puebla there was neither Reformation, nor Revolution, nor Cardenismo, nor Alternation. The old clerical Porfirian regime remains buoyant and the Lombardo Toledano or Henriquez Ureña, must flee hidden under penalty that the members of Yunque, like Testimony and Hope (or another of the thousands of organizations of the Anvil) try to kill. Avilacamachismo Poblano only reedited the old oligarchic structures that can not live without Hernán Cortés. Puebla indebted, prey of the huachicoleros, full of femicides, kidnapped by insecurity, poor and informal, is a product of the union between Moreno Valle and Yunque.
There is nothing to laugh at the political analysts of the Anvil, its candidates or members. The political class, in general, does not have the courage to confront them. The geopolitical condition is imposed: while North America fears socialism, the Catholic extreme right will have legitimacy to handle the States. Hence the capacity for violence, disorder, instability and crime that generates clerofascism to obtain inclusion in governments. What is important to say to the United States, as well as to Mexican society, is that, as long as the extreme right remains in power, social pathologies will continue and the cost increases each period. Morelos, Guanajuato, Puebla, Tamaulipas and Veracruz constitute a small sample.
If Moreno Valle is so powerful, what is the need for El Yunque? if the morenovallismo has to contribute to the vote of the PRIist-panista Meade Kuribreña, is also the Yunque a guest to fulfill the mission or the official candidate of the PRIANRD is Ricardo Anaya? Even Morena has had to lobby the extreme right through the black Jesuitism of social Catholicism. There are no reasons to laugh. Mexico is a tragedy, a sick despair of Hispanic catholicity.

Moreno; but with a free soul

Moreno; but with a free soul
By Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

2018 will be a caste war. It is not the first nor the last occasion that this happens in a country like Mexico. Miscegenation is a myth that seeks to hide our differences; although these have always been there, distinguishing the country from each one. The polarization that has generated the injustice of the economic structure is shown in the evidence of INEGI regarding the racism that persists in the national culture. The castes of the colonial era are still there for the pride of the Creoles and resentment of others. The dark face has been the most discredited everywhere. The Virgin of Guadalupe is tanned skin; but the owners of the country are white. The morenos die in torrents due to the economic lack, violence, poverty and exclusion caused by white masters. It would be interesting to ask David Páramo in the opposite direction. What is the ratio of whites to morenos in terms of deaths by the Mexican Failed State?

Leo Zuckerman wrote a severe criticism of the comments made by Andrés Manuel López Obrador against the technocrats and the Creole -and now Lebanese- bourgeoisie that usurp the economic power in this country. Zuckerman claims to be an Eric Zemmour region four. However, Mexico is not France and the dark ones are not Muslim immigrants. The dark ones are in our country, in our land, with our cosmovision and syncretism. The terrorists are the Catholic catacomb gachupines who control the high clergy in Mexico and -they do- waste no time in conspiring against the Mexican homeland and putting themselves at the service of the Holy See or any other foreign bidder.

The attacks that society has received with brown skin -Mexicans mestizos-; those are serious. They go beyond the shame that Zuckerman points out and defend people like David Páramo. Germany has assumed its condemnation for the Nazism that inspired its behavior in the first half of the 20th century. When will a similar phenomenon occur with the Spanish Monarchy and the Holy See? Quite the opposite. The ideas of characters such as the infamous communicator José Antonio Sánchez show us the medioeval character of hispanism, its values, its schools even if they are private, they are certified as modern and they teach technocracy; they do not instruct them that the world has already changed, that's why only Mirreyes come out who, even with the disguise of neoliberals, are really technodinos. In the same sense, the Vatican State represents the most retrograde institution as far as modern thought is concerned.

The armies of General Francisco Villa and Emiliano Zapata, in their time of revolutionary splendor, expelled, murdered and raped hundreds of Spaniards in Mexico. Some of their actions claimed the massacre of the Alhóndiga de Granaditas that inspired in a decisive way the Mexican emancipation of the Spanish yoke. What's missing, Villa and Zapata! How urgent is the consciousness of Mexico's independence, once again, at the cry of Cura Miguel Hidalgo!

The workers of the organizations dedicated to the crime of drug trafficking are people with mostly dark skin. The brown people have been sacrificed with abundance in the name of a business that enriches a government and Creole oligarchy that have no reservations in controlling the transfer of drugs in the continent. They are specialists in never showing their faces, in hiding and turning things around, in committing self-attacks, they are doctors of cowardice. Fighting manly, as it has been demanded even Mario Bergoglio, is a disability of his character. The experts in dividing society, in separating families, are intransigent integral Catholics. Tartufos that always act under the tutelage of the conspiratorial skirt. Their companies are responsible for creating a narcoculture for the masses; but none of his descendants has the courage to truly become a Capo at the head of a criminal or military group commanding soldiers. The Creoles live by getting mestizos-natives in uniform to kill mestizos-Indians without uniforms; this practice was established since his arrival.

General Francisco Villa's common sense led him to consider that Spaniards could never love Mexico. For that reason he expelled them from the northwest of the country while he could and confiscated their properties, factories, haciendas and capitals to support those who had been squeezed, mistreated and raped by them. There are the testimonies of Salvador Novo and Salvador Abascal or, at least, Carlos Alvear Acevedo to confirm it. The generals Emiliano Zapata and Lázaro Cárdenas will continue this action expropriating thousands of Gachupinas haciendas and motivating the formation of agrarian battalions that would defend the morenos and the ejido lands.

Once again, the PRI has turned its back on the trajectory of the Mexican revolution that General Plutarco Elías Calles condensed when he introduced revolutionary nationalism in the country. The reactionary unity for the PRI has already been agreed with the PAN. Now the PRI has a legionary-synarchist candidate as at the time they were Miguel de la Madrid and Gustavo Díaz Ordaz. Yunques and pseudonazis with whom Zuckerman should be more concerned to coincide.

It is necessary to reflect on the fear that represents the loss of a certain order. What order is it feared to lose in the country? Eric Zemmour blames the neoliberals for the suicide that lives in France. Does not the same thing happen in Mexico? López Obrador maintains a deep erosion due to the contradictory image between love and hate that he represents. It happens that his personality escapes the aristocratic hypocrisy that substitutes frankness for delicate manners. It is preferable to oppose the traitorous vocation of Creole elites that do not end up defining their affection for the people and the land where we are. Of course, it is urgent to be critically aware in order to see how the disaster that corrupt neoliberals have made will deepen and the indignant - although coarse - verb is more useful to rebuild the homeland. Mexico is already in ruins and Zuckerman does not want to see it. López Obrador is far from being a Zapata or Villa; but that does not mean that some characters -like those warlords-, in fact, are already in the fight against the Post-Porfirian Army.

Who has caused the disorder and anarchy in this country? Who has caused the foreign intervention? Who are the leaders of the pederasty and white slave that controlled Mario Marín? Does not Leo Zuckerman know the work of Salvador Borrego? With everything and its technocratic whiteness Itamita, Think Zuckerman that is in the creole elite of Mexico? So, are brown men more dangerous than gachupines? There is the INEGI survey that describes the color, inequality and contrast of Mexican clevages.

The outcasts who abjured their origin remain as servants and lackeys of a social structure that in no way remedies the crisis of the country; there they do if they consider servility to be a solution. Slavery does not take away the place of birth, skin color or religion; These elements only disappear when a nation becomes modern, when the Reformation-Revolution becomes a real historical break with the Catholic Hispanic Baroque.

Andreas Schedler, the party of "perrones" and the electoral gutierritos

Andreas Schedler, the party of "perrones" and the electoral gutierritos

By Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

José Antonio Meade Kuribreña is asking for US intervention in Mexico to safeguard the discouraged national bourgeoisie and not break with dependence on US imperialism. Only in this way can the Internal Security Law be understood as well as the lack of recognition of the reality that our country is experiencing. A character like Andreas Schedler (In the fog of war, 2015) is surprised by the cynicism and denial that is made of a context like the Mexican. The academic is one of the most important figures of national political science; However, the most important thing has been its evolution from the defenseless electoral analysis to the study and understanding of the phenomenon that distinguishes this cute and bandit Mexico: violence. Our country is experiencing a war of low intensity, at the level of the Middle East, that few have wanted to see and, even less, try to do something to organize -only- the issue. Schedler's ideas disagree with those political scientists and social scientists who are blinded by internal colonialism. For this caste of organic intellectuals, the country is at peace and considers Meade Kuribreña as the most exemplary citizen that the PRI could achieve. The situation is serious to be disguised in this way. The Mexican academy not only borders on irresponsibility and inefficiency; He has also been infected with the Lucifer syndrome characteristic of the national oligarchy. They accuse animosity when they are referred to the most obvious data; But, the situation is beyond the borderline between the social groups that make up our social structure. There is no longer space to support the slaughterhouse that Mexico became. Do not they smell the stench of flesh and blood?

Historical manipulation and denial are everyday factors in the perspective of hegemonic thinking. It has gone from golden history to history in pink. The Mexican Revolution, the PRI, Díaz Ordaz and Echeverría never existed for the fascist intellectual  -like Francisco Franco in the Spanish television sausages-. The oligarchy and its electoral gutterritos tell the myth of a democratic transition princess whose velvet reaches the limits of the universe and its blue prince overflows charisma, leadership and kindness as Maciel of the Legionaries of Christ. Studies like those of Andreas Schedler inform us that, the fantastic thing really, was the beautiful trajectory of the transition; there was never "alternation" or "political change" but a "modus vivendi" between the bishops of the Revolutionary Family and the bishops of the Holy See to coexist the Mexican government.

Now that López Obrador proposes a pact with the drug trafficking groups to establish peace in Mexico, the electoral and technocratic packs have been released to question the idea. Have you forgotten the proposal to legalize the transfer and consumption of drugs that in the past was observed as a logical way to reduce the social bitterness of the nation? Even Vicente Fox agreed with the need to regularize the psychotropic business as it is done in some states of the American Union. Where was the fixation in the model of the Netherlands to make Mexico a simile of European harmonic consumption?

Those who accuse of extravagant - to say the least - Peje's proposal, are the same ones who make millions of dollars in their television networks promoting series and characters that constitute, yes, monuments to the culture of crime and impunity. They oppose the legalization of drugs, the regularization of arms, the construction of peace, then, what do they want? Surely they propose the Kirrarcado Mirrey that they have learned in the Creole homeland. They have become immensely rich building a Narco-State. Is not it still enough?

The PRI candidate for the presidency of Mexico, seeks to open the doors to US military intervention justifying the force of narcoterrorism as an obstacle to governance. The oligarchy supports this issue because it seeks to emulate Panama, Colombia, Honduras or Guatemala; where Creole strains have managed to preserve their privileges by taking care of the business of the empire. The powers that be do not assume their responsibility in front of the monster they have created. They do not want to govern; but they want to remain in government to safeguard their lineages, interests and corruption.

The electoral gutterritos that praise, of course, to the priandist Meade; They are first-line liars and dishonest. If their electoral indices have not shown them that now PRI govern us all political parties, that everyone surrenders to presidential honey trying to be the most servile; So, why do you think we should believe them now? The legalization of drugs, their economic regularization and pacification with regional cartels, is the most civilized measure to give the government leeway in many entities and municipalities of the country. Was the bloodbath that Felipe Calderón Hinojosa offered to Mexico useful? Why do not the armed forces shoot down corrupt and unbalanced politicians?

Agreeing peace with regional drug trafficking groups as well as other subaltern associations is a necessary and urgent measure; before those in charge of factionalism carry out their tasks. Indeed, history and fiction should serve to diminish so much head in the political act. It has happened a thousand times. Provided that Mexicans, institutional and subordinate, decide to organize themselves; the foreign element appears to generate selfishness and confrontation. Within the narcoculture promoted by the Mass Media, there is a film like "La fiesta de los perrones" (Jesus Fragoso Montoya, 1999) that clearly proves the aggressive interventionism against Mexico. It is obvious that the drug trafficking groups and the government of the country could find a Pareto optimum to harmonize their relationship; However, this is inconvenient for North America and its vassals. Even if the drug traffickers decided to make peace, the United States and its Creole employees would generate the confrontation that would allow them to rationalize the context. The American Union does not want to end the public health problem that has become the drug phenomenon; he wants money and he will do everything possible to get it. North America seeks to control drug trafficking because it continues to be one of the best businesses in the world; No matter that most of his youth is sunk in addictions. Can they intervene militarily in Mexico if things keep getting complicated? Of course, with all the right in between. The arms business is also profitable from its rational choice. They have sold bullets and military supplies to all the sides that want to destroy themselves in our republic. Hence the reason for choosing peace before it is too late. On the Creole serfs who have always betrayed their countries of birth; there is nothing to say.

Something similar happens with Andreas Schedler than with Stephen Hawking. The neglect of the political scientist and the physicist will be terrible to the future. Do not they count, said characters, with sufficient scientific capacity to pay attention? Or measures of coexistence and pacification are established with the armed groups of the drug traffickers, the self-defense groups, the populations inserted in the crime and the insurgent groups that legitimately seek to survive in front of the specter of neoliberalism, or the country will be condensed of independent figures like the General Francisco Villa and Emiliano Zapata that in Mexico and now in the south of the United States will demand with all the force that justice that the colonial structure has denied.

Morelos: the gospel of the Anvil

Morelos: the gospel of the Anvil 

By Diego Velázquez 

https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2017/11/30/Morelos-el-evangelio-del-Yunque

The political situation in the entity that gave birth to General Emiliano Zapata, is proof of the capacity for anarchy, violence and blackmail that the Mexican far right can exercise. Infiltration, destabilization and terrorism are some of the conditions that have marked the actions of façade organizations such as the Testimony and Hope (Testimonio y Esperanza) Movement of Catholic nationalist roots. Jalisco, Michoacán, Guanajuato, Puebla, Querétaro and Aguascalientes, to name a few entities, have experienced situations of ungovernability derived from the deep and mysterious interests that integral intransigent Catholicism holds. 

It is true that Graco Ramírez does not escape the condition of bad rulers; however, it is also true that the state administration has had to dismantle all those public spaces where the Catholic secret societies settled its possessions. The dozen of PAN governments are jointly responsible for the upbringing of crime, drug trafficking, underdevelopment and insecurity in Morelos. No government has been able to contain and organize the problems of that state, it deprives a factionalism and a scheme of conspiracies that annuls all public policy. 

The confrontation of the state government with the rector of the Autonomous University of the State of Morelos (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos), is a phenomenon that had been lived in the Center for Research and Teaching in Humanities of the State of Morelos (CIDHEM Centro de Investigación y Docencia en Humanidades del Estado de Morelos). The persecution accusing the characters identified with the extreme right is ridiculous in comparison with what they did when they usurped power. Testimony and Hope (Testimonio y Esperanza) pursues its critics in the same way as Manuel Abad and Queipo, Matías Monteagudo or Félix María Calleja. Public Universities, City Councils, Dependencies, State Governments, etc., are managed under the worst mode of patrimonialism and corruption if the government is ultraconservative PAN. Not to mention when it comes to their spaces or companies: the Colonial Property is still the structure from which thinks the social order. 

What happens in Morelos must be an element of conscience to decide what Mexicans want in the country. It is not the first time that the extreme right has appropriated the PRI candidate to the presidency of the republic; it happened with Miguel Alemán, Gustavo Díaz Ordaz and Miguel de la Madrid Hurtado. From 1941, the Americans forced the Mexican government to a "modus vivendi" that cohabited with the Holy See in public administration. Although Taxman is presented as a citizen, his training does not escape the characteristics that General Emilio Portes Gil attributed to young charismatic Catholics. Even when Technodino, in the end, is still an Ranch

manager. 

One element must be highlighted in the political realignment that will lead to the candidacy of José Antonio Meade Kuribreña. Several groups of social Catholicism, and even the intransigent, are realizing that in the face of neoliberal globalization, vulnerability affects us all. The hacienditas (little farm) then, can disappear and break forever if the PRI retains the presidency; there will be no Ambrosian or Cantabrian financing when the NAFTA collapses and the United States opts for the military invasion to develop its own economy. 

The intransigent integral Catholicism must allow the public administration and the Mexican State to progress. If there is no Public Good, there is no government, nor politics, nor country. The respect and defense of public goods is something that is urgent in Mexico, we will have to think and discuss the way.