Should the US invade Mexico?

 Should the US invade Mexico?

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero 

The conflict in Ukraine has led to a rethinking of the relationship and the social fractures between Mexicans as well as between Mexico and the United States. The debate regarding the reasons for the Ukrainian groups that have developed a previous civil war can be raised in almost the same way in our country: there is a social fracture -perhaps several more- between individuals, which refers to preferences regarding the tradition and modernity. In Ukraine, the region close to Russia has pro-Russian sentiment and cultural reasons for choosing tsarist Orthodox Christianity, conservative authoritarianism, and Eurasianism; the western zone identifies with the values ​​of capitalist liberal democracy as well as the postmodern values ​​of consumerist cultural metastasis. The European East/West has been translated as the Mexican North/South due to the opposition to Morena and the 4T. Just as the pro-American Ukrainians call for NATO intervention to confront Russia, even at the expense of bursting the nuclear cataclysm that would end humanity; In the same way, a large part of pro-American neoliberal Mexicans ask for North American intervention against the national government as if all the evils of the republic had begun in 2018.

Vladimir Putin has pointed out that the military intervention in Ukraine is due to the genocide that Nazi paramilitary groups and drug addicts committed against the population with cultural and racial ancestry identified as pro-Russian. This argument is important to understand the geopolitics of the United States towards Mexico and the reasons of the right that supports interventionism. In Mexico, the gangs of Nazis, drug traffickers and genocide; they have acted - at least during the 20th century - as allies of North America. The monstrosities that Russia is committing against Ukrainian democracy have been done by the United States against Mexico for most of its history.

The United States, not the democrat but the insane imperial Caesar, has used pentagonism to sponsor conservative and neoliberal dictatorships that not only exterminated actors resistant to modernity and capitalism, but also discarded nationalist armies and military defenses, as is now happening in Mexico. Anomie and anarchy developed uncontrollably during the neoliberal era to subsidize the informal and military economy of the United States. Arms trafficking from the United States to Mexico shows the indolence and hypocrisy of Democratic-Republican companies and governments. The paramilitary groups and political coalitions that the United States has financed for a long time are also part of the war crimes committed by Yankee imperialism. Mexico and Ukraine have similar stories, you just have to see who is financing the mafias of Nazis and drug addicts that cause genocide.

North America has waged a secret war against Mexico since the very moment of its independence, conferring on itself the invisible power that has governed our country since colonial times. Mexican neocolonialism is pro-Yankee, pro-Hispanist and neoliberal. America's secret war against Mexico began in 1821 and is about to take control of the country. The Ukrainian scenario is no different from various events in the history of the country. Ukraine cannot join NATO and Mexico cannot be free, democratic, egalitarian, independent, legal, sovereign.

The invisible power fueled by the United States against Mexico has colonized all spheres of human life in our society. The American Union speaks of invading the Mexican Republic now that a government intends to change the structural violence that sustains the Creole and administrative oligarchies of the empire. The pentagonist press and intelligentsia have always pointed to Mexico as a criminal nation, a failed state; but it is not stated that the mafias and sultanates are allies of the CIA and the DEA.

The north of the country was intervened to detonate unprecedented violence that has become the real wall with the US, also as a justification to militarize the country and weaken the Armed Forces and, in this way, finally develop a military contingent completely North American service.

The Mexican State and the Armed Forces are already in a war against the paramilitary and Nazi advance of the United States. The War of the year 2080 envisioned by George Friedmann is a cruel reality, with one important difference: the financial power of drug trafficking is in the United States and neoliberalism has only served for extermination and neo-extractivism.

Vladimir Putin is not wrong when he points out that the Western world has avoided denazification, it is the great slope of the capitalist world. The United States is the Fourth Reich and financier of genocidal fascism. Democracies die because Nazism lives.

LIBRO. ANTICOMUNISMO, NACIONALISMO CATÓLICO, GEOPOLÍTICA. EL IMPACTO SOBRE MÉXICO

 https://www.academia.edu/72334389/Anticomunismo_nacionalismo_cat%C3%B3lico_y_geopol%C3%ADtica_El_impacto_sobre_M%C3%A9xico

https://www.academia.edu/72334389/Anticomunismo_nacionalismo_cat%C3%B3lico_y_geopol%C3%ADtica_El_impacto_sobre_M%C3%A9xico

PRESENTACIÓN DEL LIBRO: ANTICOMUNISMO, NACIONALISMO CATÓLICO Y GEOPOLÍTICA. EL IMPACTO SOBRE MÉXICO

https://www.lajornadadeoriente.com.mx/puebla/publicacion-del-libro-anticomunismo-nacionalismo-catolico-y-geopolitica-el-impacto-sobre-mexico/ 

Nolte, Bartra, the bloodthirsty Atlanticist Eurocentrism…,

 Nolte, Bartra, the bloodthirsty Atlanticist Eurocentrism…,

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero 

The conflict in Ukraine has made it possible to visualize the white racial hegemony of Eastern European countries and the empathy of different wasp and Nazi oligarchies in imperialist nations such as the United States, England, France and Germany. The attacks of various Ukrainian, Euro-Eastern and Whitexican actors against those who doubt or evade disapproving of Russia in the face of NATO, are an example of the discrimination and oligarchy that these sectors promote for their empowerment against mestizo, indigenous, Afro-American and Latin Americans. even Hispanics. The racism of characters with Eastern European ancestry or foreigners against Mexicans was forceful. In Latin America it is enough to be white to achieve almost everything. It is measured by INEGI.

Confuse Russia with the USSR, the empires of Catherine the Great, Ivan the Terrible or the Romanovs; it is a fallacy full of terror that demonstrates the necessary denazification of the West and the consolidated democracies.

The national show business, conservative groups and pro-business legislative caucuses; they have been launched against Russia in the reactionary way that Ernst Nolte describes and justifies in his work on the European civil war. The pro-Anglo-Saxon religious, racist and neoliberal paranoia was already developed in the ideas of Alfred Rosenberg. The hatred of Russia only shows the xenophobia and aporophobia of the white and privileged West of which the White Mexican Creole oligarchy considers itself a part. They annul from their vision, because they do not want to compromise, the most serious situations that our country is experiencing: in a few weeks the death toll of the Ukrainian-Russian war is reached and exceeded, structural poverty and systematic violence develop an anomic society with no possibility of survival , we have lived through a low-intensity war and human displacement that finances the United States anonymously. Although it is talked about in a bizarre way, the Whitexicans, Ukrainians, foreigners living in the country, hear little about it and care little.

Russia has applied to join NATO and the European Union jointly. It has not been granted; on the contrary, it is harassed militarily and its racial groups are exterminated in some regions. An illustrious professor who wanted to study the region, made a paragon of the Hutu and Tutsi confrontation. It is not the first time that European Anglo-Saxon Nazism has exterminated other Europeans. Vivianne Forrester describes the Shoah as an open wound in Western civilization that urgently needs re-education. Europe is the most violent civilization of humanity.

Unlike other peoples who can only resignedly humiliate themselves to the conqueror, Russia confronts NATO because it has developed the means to protect itself as a National State. Few nations, after being devastated, are able to reconstitute themselves as hegemonic. Israel is an exceptional case. And Russia too. For every blow dealt to Israel returns a thousand, Russia can say the same. By way of liberal modernization and authoritarian modernization, both nations have legitimately earned their right to exist.

Russia has not been treated equally by the pro-American white oligarchy, but Russia can defend itself. This is the reason that the peoples of Eastern Europe dominated by Yankee Nazi-fascism cannot stand.

In 2006, Roger Bartra described the possibility that Mexico would reach a civil war -similar to the Mexican revolution- derived from the oligarchic Hispanic Creole voracity. The trauma of the Spanish conquest is an open wound that requires a process of re-education, nothing to continue promoting a pure Hispanic identity that is basically pro-Anglo-Saxon. But Bartra could not contain the aporophobia or escape from the hegemonic whiteness. Now it turns out that the victims are to blame for being victims.

Spontaneous liberal modernization is a goal that cannot be achieved through colonialism and Anglo-Saxon hegemony. The gap and underdevelopment experienced by marginalized nations requires distance and the absence of empires to overcome and balance their development. Poverty is structural and dependent on imperialism. If the empires do not pretend to help their colonies, they can at least leave them in the autonomy that constitutes a singular benefit.

How not to support Russia when liberal democracy only produces pigmentocracy and violence?

Why fail to understand Russia when the United States is violent, aggressive and dirty against the Latin American flower garden?

How to stop supporting anti-Nazism in Russia when the United States has been a partner of the Nazis who founded the Fourth Reich in America?

Why fail to recognize the capacity, value and need of nations that can defend themselves?

The Mexican gueritocracy, is it Mexican?

Mexico. The Ukraine of a bizarre world

 Mexico. The Ukraine of a bizarre world

Diego Martin Velazquez Caballero

The former Polish ambassador to Mexico and an American journalist sparked an interesting debate on social networks as a result of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict in Eastern Europe. Broadly speaking, the line of the arguments criticized Russia's sympathy for confronting Yankee imperialism; Several Mexican Internet users were warned that a similar aggression was the robbery of Texas and the Californias in one of the best-known Anglo-Saxon looting. Updating the geography and time, he wondered what Mexicans would feel if the American Union took Chihuahua or Baja California by force. Although it is true that the war of 1836 and 1847 continues to be a painful trauma in national history; Times have changed and Mexico is resigned to a solitude where -as well as or worse than Ukraine- no one supports it in the civil conflagration that it is experiencing due to drug trafficking.

If the United States will take the north of the country militarily, it is most likely that other states will ask to be integrated, it happened in the 19th century and it is also likely that other Latin American nations will ask to be incorporated as US protectorates. It happens at the OEA. Mexico is only missing Mickey Mouse ears.

The United States has behaved worse with respect to Latin America than that of Russia with respect to Eastern Europe. Neither the former ambassador of Poland, nor the journalist specialized in Mexican-American relations, question the pentagonism that feeds weapons and dollars to the drug trafficking groups that are tearing the country apart. Nor do they question the new slavery that Mexican emigration means and that the real Mexican economy makes alms of its avocados.

Just as a large part of the Ukrainian population historically identifies with Russia and, in part, conceives a hegemony over Eurasia. Many Mexicans emigrate to the United States and a large part of the Latin American population would prefer to live in North America. Mexico, like several Eastern European countries, is a puppet of the Western powers that plays the role of suicidal internal colonialism. Some interesting point of the cybernetic debate pointed out, what would the Anglo-Saxons feel if Russia set up military bases and nuclear missiles in Baja California, Chihuahua, Nuevo León, Sonora and Tamaulipas? And the Guns and Roses fell silent remembering the taste of free Cuba.

Eastern Europe is described as being the "Trojan Donkey" of the Holy See, Germany and the United States. Mexico is the asshole of Hispanidad. Just as Eastern Europe has been sacrificed several times to frighten Russia, Mexico cultivates an internal colonialism that does not help it at all and only constitutes a Spanish mortgage that structures the pigmentocracy of poverty. Vox, the Franco regime subsidized with dollars, a few days ago, questioned and declared war on Latin American drug trafficking by discriminating against it in all forms and, in addition, adding the label of communist. Does the Spanish Colony really have the courage to oppose the drug cartels on the continent with all its might? Will the Franco regime question the socioeconomic structure that reproduces poverty and crime that Hispanic heritage inherited? Is the Spanish Colony going to confront the Narco-empire that is the United States? Well no.

Samuel Huntington suggested isolationism and abandonment of the Brzezinski model of world control to the United States. Mexico and North America can build Spanglishdad. There was always the fear of Francoism so that Mexico would replace Spain as the axis of Hispanidad, all the forces of the dictator were concentrated on burying the Second Spanish Republic in Mexico and burying our country. And it was successful. But the natural tendencies indicate that Hispanic people have died in Mexico and their discourses and identities remain hollow in the face of reality. The Mexican lumpenproletariat that shames and discriminates against Hispanics is building Mexamerica. Just as millions of Ukrainians run into the arms of Russia and millions of Mexicans run into the arms of the US, empires must recognize the hegemonic nature of geography.

WEST VERSUS RUSIA

West versus Russia

Diego Martin Velazquez Caballero

The situation in Ukraine appears important in recent weeks as it shows the decline of the United States and NATO in Eastern Europe. The confrontation between the American and Russian intelligence apparatuses has generated the possibility of an armed conflict that delimits the borders of the Western world. The United States and the values ​​it represents have to accept a setback in the post-covid world.

Even when it is intended to make Russia, China and the Middle East look like barbarian civilizations; The truth is that Yankee Imperialism cannot sustain the fallacies with which it has achieved economic hegemony since the end of World War II. Liberalism, democracy and human rights are not the elements that distinguish Western culture; On the contrary, they are the reasons for the anti-American obsession that, justifiably, the peoples have the right to reject at this fundamental moment in the history of humanity. The departure of the United States from Afghanistan indicates that the alleged universalization of modernity and Western values ​​is not true, the United States maintains geographical pivots and fragile geopolitical balances to remain firm in the voracious capitalism that passes over the peoples.

Ukraine and Eastern Europe have not constituted modernizing democratic transitions but the consolidation of a military wall that aims to destroy Russia, this society has the right to defend itself and protect its vital space. The United States has failed to include Russia in the Western world in a peaceful and pluralistic way, it has sought the humiliating subordination of the region to subsidize the hidden economy of Western imperialism. It is not human beings but the power of the dollar that interests the North American democratic simulation.

Historically, an infinite anti-Russian civilization predominates in Europe as a civilizing project that has sought the disappearance of Russia from the Catholic and Protestant Christian vision, this element has lasted for more than a century and is an example of the political use that is given to religion for the imperialist geopolitical ends. The West has failed and Russia will extend its regional influence because it is the right thing to do against a Europe and the United States that have been unfair to the Baltic Slavic civilization and to the rest of humanity.

The way in which Russia has been transformed in recent decades is an indication of the actions that political leaders will take against states in the future to get ahead. If the triumph of Russia is generated in Eastern Europe, a liberalization of the regions is proposed where Latin America, and Mexico in particular, can draw lessons to reduce a historical colonialism that has become a pathological symbiosis that is resulting in the promotion of Failed state.

García Luna, Bartlett and tough times

 García Luna, Bartlett and tough times

Diego Martin Velázquez Caballero

Although several journalists and intellectuals speak of the decline of Mario Vargas Llosa, it is enough to read some of his novels and articles to understand the importance that he has - and will have - as one of the main Latin American thinkers. Perhaps for this reason, Juan Carlos Monedero urgently requests the socialization of his works. Vargas Llosa's literature continues to be the best political science to understand us.

The author's recent novel that makes reference to the coup d'état articulated by the United States in Guatemala against General Jacobo Arbenz gives rise to a perspective on imperialist interventionism on the Ibero-American left and right. Each governmental period, whether or not it has partisan alternations, the question always lies in synchronizing with North American capitalist interests. The Hispanic-Latino government that does not subjugate itself to the oligarchic machinery of Yankee imperialism will be harassed - in the most brutal way possible - until it complies with the demands of the United Fruit Company or is overthrown. With everything and that a fact does little to confirm theories, the idea of ​​US imperialist geopolitics repeated in all times and places in Latin America is absolute.

The American conspiracy against Guatemalan democracy always occurs where there is a United States embassy. Therefore, there should be no surprise about the García Luna case and the war against drug trafficking in our country, the same questions that are asked of former presidents -particularly Calderón Hinojosa- can be asked in different periods of national history, past and present. present. Is there a difference between the tasks that García Luna and Manuel Bartlett performed under the national security scheme in the service of the United States? Is there a difference between the counterinsurgent forces and the drug cartels used in Yankee geopolitics? Has the CIA changed your view of Latin America? The governments employed by North American imperialism are always going to wage wars against their people, even a government like the one in Q4 that has not known how to detach itself - and has no possibility whatsoever - of North American tutelage. Why were there and are there characters like García Luna and Manuel Bartlett in Mexico? Because that is the way the United States wants it and there is little that can be done to prevent it. Be it the Cold War, the Dirty War, the War against Drug Trafficking, it is always a war against the people so that, despite the deficit of the North American economy, the situation allows them to continue being a superpower.

George Friedman envisions a war between Mexico and the United States in 2080 due to drug trafficking, but North America's secret war against our country has always existed and if the conflict increases, it will not be for the geopolitical reasons that said author supposes. If remittances and drug trafficking served to strengthen the economic and military sector of the country, society, at least, would have left the marginality so wide that distinguishes it a long time ago. The narco-empire is the United States, there are the stratospheric profits from criminal activities, we only put the dead. It has always been like this. The conflict will occur because the mafia cartels and millions of immigrants are in the United States and have been empowered enough to prevent being drawn out of the imperialist economic dynamics. That conflict has originated the disruptive policy of Donald Trump that talks about invading Mexico or putting up Walls, over time he will discover that the 250 thousand soldiers or the walls must be implanted in California, Texas, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona or Florida. The United States has caught the Failed State that it has implemented so much everywhere.

Unfortunately, the decline of the United States has not served to leave the script of hard times. The media terrorism, the gringo financing for all the political forces and organized crime groups, the lack of national unity, the inconsistency of a political and governmental project, are indicative that we were, are and will be, the North American Sicily that will provide the millions of deaths that are necessary to continue thanking remittances.

America's irrational capitalism and racism is not going to change. They are the postmodern Nazis that the world must intelligently face to solve the dilemma of coexistence. Either we understand how right Ernesto Guevara was when he demanded missiles in revolutionary Cuba or we promote the North American civil war so that a new socio-political liberalism may emerge. With Monedero I say, well, you have to read more Mario Vargas Llosa.