Intermarium The Catholic anti-communist strategy in 20th-century Mexico.

Intermarium. La estrategia anticomunista católica en el México del Siglo XX.
Samuel Schmidt Nedvedovich
Xochitl Patricia Campos López
Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

Revista Albores. N. 3. Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro


https://www.academia.edu/39891136/Intermarium_La_estrategia_anticomunista_cat%C3%B3lica_en_el_M%C3%A9xico_del_siglo_XX

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334614943_INTERMARIUM_LA_ESTRATEGIA_ANTICOMUNISTA_CATOLICA_EN_EL_MEXICO_DEL_SIGLO_XX

https://issuu.com/alboresrevista/docs/albores._tercer_n_mero._final__issu

The end of the Cristero War?

The end of the Cristero War?
June 27, 2019

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2019/06/27/%C2%BFEl-fin-de-la-Guerra-Cristera

In 1929 the Agreements that brought peace to the conflict between the Catholic Church and Mexico were generated through the intervention of the United States of America and some of the world's main anti-Communist agents of the Holy See such as Edmund Walsh. The conflicts, unfortunately, continued. Still in 1937, Mexico, the Spanish Republic and the Soviet Union were besieged by Catholic nationalism that the Holy See implemented in several regions. The intransigent religious integralism was transformed into a confrontation with the Mexican Revolution, the social, indigenous and peasant movements.

            Some years ago, historians such as Paolo Valvo and Fernando M. González came to the conclusion that certain bishops deceived the Holy See to involve it in the conflict and to acquire international pressure so that the Mexican government not only gave in to the demands of the conservative groups but, above all, stop the actions of social justice that had been sustained in the revolutionary demands. The objective was successful in the short, medium and long term. From the Agreements, then in 1941, during the Cold War and, above all, in the neoliberal era, it has gone from a diplomatic negotiation to a frank concordat where the republic is subordinated to an imperialism.

            Despite the interpretation that historians make of the evidence, it is necessary to enrich the analysis with other sources and studies. It is true that local groups can manipulate things and distort information for an institution as large as the Catholic Church. However, given the geopolitical, historical, economic, social and informative power that Catholicism has; it does not lend itself to manipulation. It is incredible that, on the one hand, the Catholic Church is considered one of the pillars against the fight against world communism and, on the other hand, it is said to be deceived by some bishops located in our country.

            The Spanish Republic was destroyed by the intervention of the Holy See in support of fascism, a similar pattern would develop in the USSR at the turn of the twentieth century. The regime of the Mexican Revolution saved the skin, but had to make multiple concessions and only kept the adjective against the counterrevolutionary demands to which it was subjected.

The Cristero War was an unfortunate event that should not have happened and that was caused by the ecclesiastical hierarchy attached to the Holy See. A perpetuation of the civil war that seems endless and prevents building a national project and develop an institutional scaffolding to promote well-being and well being among Mexicans. The remembrance of the agreements with the Holy See should be indicative that Mexico is subject to two imperialisms and that, in the face of such a situation, things are complicated.

              Edmund Walsh was one of the Jesuit architects who infiltrated the USSR and shaped the anticommunism of the Cold War. Faced with such characters, can you believe that Mexicans cheat the Vatican State?

               The anticlericalism of the first half of the twentieth century in Mexico and Latin America is justified. The political groups that tried to modernize and change the social structure of their countries, did not imagine that the Old Regime had such strong and powerful allies as the Holy See. General Porfirio Diaz's own government had to turn into a clerical dictatorship in the face of the impossibility of exercising a government without the pacts with the religious institution.

            General Plutarco Elías Calles and Licenciado Benito Juárez are patriots who show us the way in which a government has to emancipate itself to combat this form of interventionism that does not cease or change over the years. In the case of Mexico, the agreements of 1929 are the sign of a pact between institutions that would end up subjecting Mexico and Mexicans to the control of intransigent integral Catholics. The military, agraristas and citizens who decided to confront the Holy See in those difficult days, must also be admired as heroes.

            The space of Mexico was always ambitioned by several powers and the Cristero War was the conflict where the United States was also subjected to this tutoring of Imperialist Political Catholicism. The importance of remembering the imposition of these Agreements for the Mexican State, includes understanding one of the ideological inheritances of this coexistence with the Holy See: anti-communism.

            This form of political thought authorized the survival of the most retrograde and anti-modern forms of the Mexican and Latin American social structure. Anti-communism, the legacy of such agreements, is maintained today with such radical ways as if only yesterday Lenin had come to power. Many groups of intransigent integral Catholicism forget that they co-governed with the PRI much more than thirty years neoliberal. The ninety years that fulfill the agreements of 1929 are the period of understanding between North America, the revolutionary Family and the Holy See to take over the country. In all these years only the Mexicans have lost, they have given time, sweat, blood, tears and resources for the dispute of these hegemonic powers that will never dedicate a few minutes of their mercy.

            Andrés Manuel López Obrador is treated by the groups of the Mexican extreme right as if he were Tomás Garrido Canabal. Sometimes I should answer them as if I were. It is not like that, AMLO defines himself as a God-fearing man and there is no doubt about the ecumenical Christianity he practices, that is, to the detriment of the country's progressive liberal-ecological groups.

            However, the agnostic-nihilistic-secular thought is misunderstood everywhere. The gods do not go to sea or space, they return in many ways and continue to nourish people's lives.

            Despite the fact that religious representatives are held responsible for serious infamies, society needs metaphysical elements to continue living and to procure, as far as possible, its existence. However irrational religions may be, they manifest as control institutions that favor social order. And order, as an instinct for conservation, is necessary for human survival.

            I hope that the far right also understood that the Welfare State and the distribution of wealth are elements that favor the conservation of humanity.

            Anti-communism was the flag that was used in the last ninety years by those who plundered the country and subjected it to the imperialisms of the West. Power has always been the goal of your strategy. They never cared about the young man of the Gospels or the Tonantzin of December twelve.

            The agreements and the reform of Article 130 must be seen as a product of imperialism that subjects Mexico and that is responsible for the serious social conditions that we keep.

The Mexican Pale of Settlement or The Pale region that is becoming increasingly hispanic

The Mexican Pale of Settlement or The Pale region that is becoming increasingly hispanic

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero
June 20, 2019

https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2019/06/20/The-Mexican-Plea-for-Settlement-o-La-regi%C3%B3n-del-P%C3%A1lido-que-se-hace-cada-vez-m%C3%A1s-Morena

For a little more than a century, much of the Jewish community lived on the periphery of the Russian empire that was located between the Black Sea, the Baltic and even territories close to the Mediterranean. The end of the First World War and the triumph of the Bolshevik revolution, generated that this area was in a vacuum of power where the ambition of imperialism, the emergence of new nations and racist campaigns, detonated the Second World War and the War Cold The region is synonymous with perpetual violence and infinite hatred.

The south of the United States of America, territory stolen from Mexico, has become a Limited Settlement for all Mexicans in Latin America, Asia and Oceania. During the 19th century, millions of African slaves were slaughtered to build American wealth. With the advance of Anglo-Saxon economic and democratic liberalism, Africans were replaced by Hispanics. According to Samuel Huntington, or any other conservative analyst, Mexicans are a more serious challenge than Terrorism and seem to be about to build the Mexican American State.

The power of Mexican culture, especially surrealism and spontaneity, make it impenetrable and uncontrollable. The Anglo-Saxon values ​​yield to the Mexican symbols. According to Huntington, in the south and the east of the United States, the WASP (White Anglo Saxon Protestant) tends to be the stranger in his country.

Intervention is equal to inmigration and North America knows that it can not escape this axiom. France, with its selection of world champion football in 2018, must have recognized that the suicide of its white, Catholic and European model must yield to a reality that they provoked through colonialism. All empires observe as barbarians their colonized peoples. They bet even for its extinction. But it is a social regularity that these barbarians enter the metropolis and over time give new blood to the hegemony. It is also called elite circulation. Samuel Huntington glimpsed that part of the problem that now North America does not know how to solve and that, nevertheless, has in the option of multiculturalism a lasting solution.

The US migratory conflict has propelled the Executive Power of that country to supremacist politicians like Donald Trump; however, the geopolitical and hegemonic position of the United States has changed and can no longer recover its identity. However, the problems of a disorderly and overwhelming immigration have begun to infect the social pathologies that the countries of origin have and the superpower diminishes its governability, legality, health, order and citizenship. The responsibility has to do with the political elites and their incompetence, their ambition and longing for power. In the end, they do not defend a people or a race, they are a gang that seeks to enrich themselves and employ other opportunists.

If Donald Trump tries to be the Adolf Hitler that will take the Mexicans out of the limited settlement, we know how the story ends. Is the EU willing to balkanize the south and east of its territory? Will North America turn Mexico into the Poland of Hitler and Stalin? The problems derived from Mexican immigration in North America are related to the peculiar form of imperialism that has been practiced in Latin America. While the neoliberals, technocrats and pseudo fascists have the Yankee support to stay against institutionalizing the Welfare State in each of their countries, the result will be obvious. People prefer to emigrate and there will be no wall that stops their desire to reach North America to improve their standard of living and abandon the conservative narcomodernidad that only consolidates corruption and violence.

The Jimmy Carter experience and the IRCA of Ronald Reagan, can be a reference for the current situation. It is necessary that the United States implement policies to change the internal government of the expelling countries since a large part of what happens in Mexico and Latin America has been driven by US imperialism and the political class subordinated to them. North America has to stop supporting the Ayatolas of Neoliberalism in Latin America. They are responsible for a terrible period of poverty, corruption and violence. Until these groups cease in their desire to boycott their countries and mask liberalism is a patrimonialism without limits, only then, the Latin American republics can stabilize and contain the emigration.

The neoliberals are part of those old Nazi friends who served so much in the Cold War, but that was that expensive way. Is it not better to establish labor migratory treaties and conduct the expenditure of remittances in an effective way? Migrants, their countries of origin, have not returned much of the income for remittances they introduce. The ejector zones continue as usual; On the other hand, the states with the highest emigration rate disguise their metropolises with the façade of urban progress.

The solution is not to confront governments that little or nothing can cope with the magnitude of a problem that is global. The distribution of world income and the control of the economic, technocratic and criminal elites is the new task that the United States has at the forefront. If you let these situations pass, these cliques will not have any regard for the American people.

America must stop supporting the neoliberal façades that need caciques and drug traffickers for the political control of their countries, who do not accept the true market because they are not entrepreneurs but monopolists, who can not remove the influence of the cassock to think and behave . Likewise, it must allow the civic and participatory spirit to develop in the immigrants, instead of persecuting them with deportation, they must be encouraged to demand change and transparency from their countries, effective policies for modernization, immigrants can not continue financing factual powers so abusive and advantageous.

If the United States does not intervene in a positive way with countries that expel migration, then poverty will balkanize Yankee territory. George Friedmann, Robert D. Kaplan and Tom Clancy have warned it some time ago, the advance of the mafia cartels and the violence inside the United States is incredible. Will they be able to use extreme military force within their own country?

The Mexican polkos, who reveled in millions of dollars for allying themselves with the Nazis, surely expect Trump to build the IV Reich. Hopefully the president of the United States and American liberalism will learn from the past.

National Action and the Dark Marketing in Puebla

https://www.semanarioelreto.com/

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

Various electoral and political analyzes offer explanations for the results of the past June 2; However, after several months of partisan competition and pragmatism of the factions, discredit and bad intentions appear as common elements in such exercises. Lamentable has been the partisan role of some academics and election analysts to misinterpret the day in which Luis Miguel Barbosa was the winner. Criticism and rational study is over, anger, classism and racial intolerance remain.

The hypothesis posited by the urban-rural dichotomy to point out that the green-peasant vote won Barbosa, ends by concluding: "only the poor, assholes and marijuana vote for Morena." The anachronism of such ideas demonstrates the loss that resentment provokes.

The effect of hate campaigns has been demonstrated throughout human history. Two examples are convincing because of the temporal proximity and the evidence: anti-Semitism and anti-communism. Most of the twentieth century was occupied by these phenomena and the European and then global hell, are proof that nobody learns.

In Mexico during 2006 we had one of the most radical hate campaigns that can be remembered. For Roger Bartra, the country experienced a social conflict that was consigned as a "fracture", an element that may imply a fragmentation or fissure of the social fabric and that, from his perspective, can place the country in a civil war. The struggle between political tendencies became radicalized since López Obrador was targeted as a presidential candidate and ended with a spurious Federal Executive who had to govern sitting on the bayonets and mounted the blood railway that could not be stopped.

When the terrible twentieth century is debated and the causes that started the European civil war that later became global are sought, the hate promoted by the right and, particularly, Catholic Christianity appears. The historiography has built a more or less general explanation, the Holy See promoted fascism to recover the hegemony lost by the loss of the pontifical territories and built the myth of the Communist Masonic Judeo conspiracy. Hell broke out and the twentieth century is the main shame of modernity and European civilization. Incredible as it may seem, that was the goal.

Faced with this, the right always exonerates itself in two ways: denying the facts and manifesting a revisionism; in this way, he argues the non-existence of the Holocaust and justifies the violence unleashed as a reaction to the "Red Terror" for all the utopian and radical ideas he promoted. Hate campaigns generate an alienation that can turn into an uncontrollable violence where the goal is to attack and cause the greatest possible damage.

The infamous power of the dark campaigns is more than proven. The collaboration of the German people with Adolf Hitler, as well as other Catholic nations in Europe, has been studied from the standpoints of mass psychology and reflects that, under certain circumstances, the Lucifer Syndrome can awaken in any age and person.

The hate campaigns, dark marketing, that are beginning to be the feature of National Action, frame this party in the configuration of the European extreme right, particularly anti-Russian, anti-immigrant, aporophobic, anti-feminist and neo-Nazi.

The failure of political representation is the responsibility of all parties. Even from the PAN. What plays Enrique Cárdenas who is first in MORENA, then he is a citizen and, despite being the most successful critic of the Morenovallismo, must assume his inheritance in the PAN brand? If the PAN electorate were the conservative middle classes, as they say, the State would not be one of the poorest in the republic. Puebla is not just the commercial area of ​​Angelópolis or the "Barcelona" of Cholula.

Hate campaigns must be conjured and it is necessary to boost the responsibility of politicians. For this type of campaign, do you spend so much money? With these meager electoral results, do you have to continue funding political parties? Do you have to pay with public resources for rancor campaigns that seek confrontation among Mexicans?

It is a time of peace and work in Puebla; They are more productive than hatred and rancor. Mexico faces a peculiar situation now, the supremacist Trump has put a serious crossroads, hopefully the right does not react like the polkos of the 19th century.

End of Avilacamachismo in Puebla?

End of Avilacamachismo in Puebla?

May 22, 2019
https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2019/05/21/%C2%BFFin-del-Avilacamachismo-en-Puebla

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

There is an electoral result in the entity that will be adverse to traditional political institutes. However, the via crucis that the citizens have lived to configure the ruling class seems to throw nothing new. Even when the presumable winning party speaks of alternations and differences with the PRI and PAN regimes, the links and connections are increasingly common and everyday.

The possibility of restructuring the old hegemonic party model has encouraged Morena to admit old enemy cadres who seek survival at all costs and above anyone. The Americans also agreed with the Nazis after the Second World War, fascism was important to rebuild Europe; but, above all, to start another major war with the Soviet Union. North Americans and Nazis would defeat the USSR and implement the supercapitalism that we know as a neoliberal model.

What are the implications of the import of PRI and PAN pictures to Morena? What is the purpose of fighting in public and having "communicating vessels" in the dark? The optimum is the business of a reconstruction that ends up benefiting everyone?

Noam Chomsky considered the Cold War a consensual tragicomedy where they always lost the same: the poorest and the middle class. What operetta set up in Puebla the men of power?

The debate between the main forces that "dispute" the government of the state, is the script that warns the correlation of forces in the future. Inhuman, classist, vulgar, rude critics, the spectacle of the rabble; However, after that, the offer of consultants, image consultants and political operators to "lobby" the capitulation.

At least, two things have become clear after the spectacle of politicking that has spread widely to the detriment of the people of Puebla. On the one hand, civil society and academia have lost their role as a public sphere in the dialogical relationship of local life. The actors who, consciously or unconsciously, mortgaged these public spaces to particular and partisan interests, have committed a crime against citizenship and science. Due to their nature and importance, these spaces are neutral and must keep a strong commitment to freedom and human beings; With the cancellation of this route, the path of barbarism is legitimized. On the other hand, pragmatism and the admission of transformism in Morena, homologate the movement to the trajectories of the Cardenist left and Catholicism: they are churches with millions of believers but no faithful ones. To López Obrador, as to Bergoglio, none of his bishops and cardinals attend him, none want to smell sheep and repudiate the publicized austerity. Treason, deception and corruption are inertias of the Mexican reality.

In a bitter way, the hypothetical michelin oligarchic in Puebla is fulfilled, the avilacamachismo does not die, it only transforms. The selfies, future jobs and the businesses in door, are sample of which the spaces of power return equal to the people who occupy them.

Puebla will not change in the near future, avilacamachista consensus prevents structures from moving and only inertia allows some progress. What is serious is the level that violence, marginalization and emigration are reaching. If this is the Poblana normality that allows the coexistence of the oligarchies; Then, Puebla has already lost this next June.

Christian churches and new secularism in Mexico

Christian churches and new secularism in Mexico

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero
april 21, 2019

https://www.semanarioelreto.com/single-post/2019/04/21/Iglesias-Cristianas-y-Nueva-Laicidad-en-M%C3%A9xico?fbclid=IwAR1IbMWaqRmzYfP_vA0M7PHbyPzNqPh65I6a89OAzLab9rpfXo3McsbyXbw

Recently, the moral perspective that the President of the Republic has taken to implement a social ethic of Mexican regeneration has been severely questioned. The change regarding the human values ​​that are thought for a new republic and society includes a different form of secularism. The importance of Christianity other than Catholicism was considered as an ally of community transformation through the possibility of access to mass media. New Christianisms are present in the country and it is necessary to take them into account for social change.

The critical point has come to say that the proximity between the Chief Executive and non-Catholic Christianity implies a violation of the Lay State; although, perhaps, the real annoyance has been of the High Catholic Hierarchy, and its Falcons, so accustomed to the chaplaincy and unbelieving by the exhaustion of a relationship -or rather, subjection- between Mexico and the Holy See, between the government and the bishops of uncompromising integral Catholicism.

Why is there panic in the Catholic oligarchy regarding Protestant Christianity? From the time of the Modus Vivendi, the Holy See had managed to subjugate the Mexican State and, thanks to the United States, the Revolutionary Family and the leading groups of Catholicism, shared spaces of economic, political and social power. In the Cold War this attack against Mexico deepened to ignominy, as in Latin America, and in Neoliberalism it reached the extreme, consolidating modern conservative elites represented in the PRIAN. The model was Chile, but we became Croatia.

During the years of political transition, the reform of Constitutional Art 130 transformed Mexico into a Clerical State. Confessionalism and Neoliberalism deepened the debacle and social decomposition of the country. The Divine Monarchy of Mexico dedicated itself to looting and violating, without limits, society. There are the names of the bishops, decent families and economic groups to verify who were the beneficiaries of the Mexican destruction. This period also marks the corresponding degeneration of social values ​​in Mexico. Violence, abuse, crime and murder spread throughout the nation. The country became a republic of crime, a narco-state. The neoliberal era generated a social gangrene that became metastasis.

Society was left orphaned and abandoned, without government and moral guidance. Social movements independently and independently generated the starting point where the historical possibility of 2006 found an inspiration for 2018. In these emancipated movements are the new Churches, the non-Catholic and self-taught Christianities that were organized and protected alone. Some of them, even, tried to approach Felipe Calderón; However, they were rejected: the intransigent integral Catholicism mandates, does not share. Many people who went astray in the face of the abandonment suffered by syncretic and popular Catholic religiosity have found in these new Christianisms a form of existence and collectivity. The hierarchy of the Catholic Church became accustomed to power and was absent from the popular classes and the south of the country. Therefore, these new popular metanarratives were linked with social movements and managed to boost the citizen networks of Morena.

The vein of autonomy, self-management and independence is the way by which this relationship between Christian groups and AMLO should be interpreted when secularism is discussed. There are enormous differences, particularly with the groups of uncompromising integral Catholicism, since the new Christianisms are not subject to any empire that seeks to take advantage of Mexico, they are autonomous, original and native. It is necessary to recognize that the conflicts between the State and the Catholic Church in the historical trajectory of the country, have been because of the Vatican imperialism, will never allow the existence of a Mexican Christian Church. Calles, Juárez and Cárdenas were believers who fulfilled their historic duty to safeguard the homeland of foreign interests.

It is strange the amazement of scholars and activists of the religious phenomenon against the empowerment of Protestant groups. Those who presumed to know the subject will surely know about the work of Dr. Elio Masferrer Kan and the National School of Anthropology and History. For decades, Catholicism has been in retreat due to the attachment to political and economic power; even Mario Bergoglio has had to recognize it. The lack of honesty, probity and social work, caused that the abandoned social groups constituted new forms of spirituality, they voted for AMLO in 2018, there are social Catholics, Evangelicals, Pentecostals, Messianists, Adventists, Mormons, liberation theology, Indian, feminist, and even ecological.

The recommendations for the regeneration of Catholicism have been established by Bergoglio, do not go through violence, authoritarianism and, much less, the right. The Catholic Church needs a deep rehabilitation and order too much inside, the Hierarchy has been violated by the pope to become honest and humble, he has pointed out that it is important to abandon cowardly attitudes against those who are not Catholics. There are several forms of coexistence among different Christianities and a new one can be achieved: ecumenism. Those intellectuals and groups that now seek to initiate a Holy Inquisition against non-Catholics are evidence of the serious authoritarianism to which the Roman Curia accustomed us.

The secular State is no longer anticlerical but tolerant and no longer an enemy of the worldviews. The forms of religiosity do not correspond only to the Catholic Church. Secularism must be reconsidered in Mexico; Above all, in light of social changes. Another country can start and religious change will be one of the most important.

Has the increase of religious options in Latin America served? In the first instance, the axiom of Max Weber exposed in "The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism" can be recovered, the nations that pass from Catholic to Protestant Christianity are more developed, hardworking, liberal and democratic. It is a long-term goal that this transformation occurs, what is important is that it has begun and those defects of Mexicanness could change. If there is fear because the Protestant groups are run by North America, what about the Catholics? It is likely that Protestantism encourages the United States to have a better relationship with us. That the same educational, social, media, political and economic conditions that Catholic groups have had are open to Protestants.

All competition is positive, eliminates monopolies and forces the improvement of the actors involved. Changes in the religious forms of the country have to be supported.

Puebla: the eternal avilacamachista

Puebla: the eternal avilacamachista

(...) We are talking with our hearts in our hands, Hilario, not with good phrases to deceive people. Neither you nor me claims the country. They complain to us (leaving aside three or four fools and three or four deluded ones) the groups of conveners who go hunting for a hook to hang on; that is, three or four bands of politicians ... Duties to the country !?

Ignacio Aguirre

http://infoquorum.com/notas/2019/04/09/Opini%C3%B3n/Puebla:_el_eterno_avilacamachista?fbclid=IwAR1KC1ZIZuKr0FvsyfafvMWXS7B4VHYYuaZMwlcFpkDnJt53QxVR6oGWsks

Even though the political alternation was installed in the entity since 2010 at the Governmental level, the truth is that a political devolution predominates that shows a presence of the oligarchies of always and the null possibilities for the subaltern and popular groups to find a channel to meet their needs. needs

While it was thought that political devolution would constitute a temporary stage - albeit a long one - of political practice, while the historical ruptures were generated in order to create institutions that would configure the new spectrum of democratic forces; what has happened is the consolidation of an oligarchic pragmatic system that uses the parties as mere franchises.

The turncoat has become in a herds of wolves in sheep's clothing so that the historical cliques that have sustained the political power; but, above all, economic and social, they should be maintained and reproduced. After the defeat of the Hegemonic Party, the rules of succession became a cannibalism that has nothing to do with electoral competition. The end of the PRI allowed the return of the violent factionalism of the early twentieth century in Mexico. Then, as now, aggressive factionalism generates ungovernability and weakening of institutions.

Puebla leads an oligarchic family dispute where society always loses.

At least three avilacamachismo tendencies compete: gringos, morenos and revolutionaries.

The scale of appearance indicates that, probably, Morena reaches the governorship; However, given the transfuguism that has been a constant since December of last year, avilacamachismo and neoavilacamachismo will remain.

The problem of the transfuguism is not that it generates constant and unpredictable electoral realignments but ends up by empowering the factions or cliques and de-institutionalizing the government and parties. There is a common core that few perceive, the node from which the privileges and prebends are distributed to the members of the oligarchy.

The defeat or triumph of some clique does not mean much difference, the nucleus is invisible and maintains control. If all the political groups are linked to the longest-lived probostazgo in local history; Then, there are no real alternatives.

A clear example is the experiences in the City Councils and the Legislative Power; the representatives of Morena have not changed a minimum element of the old regime. What is the use of governing the most important municipalities of the State? When will the infamous legislative decisions of the past be modified in municipal matters, of control and security? At what point will the obscure judiciary, the security apparatuses and the public administration as a whole be restructured?

It seems that Puebla is going through a velvet transition, which is nothing more than a transition that has been negotiated. Morena has gone from being the Juan Preciado of "Llano en llamas" to the party that everyone wants as a civic model of Puebla, unfortunately this has meant the incorporation of all kinds of forces without any regard and, most of the time, over the authentic citizen bases and networks. If they really won the 2018 local elections, why do they need alliances with those who dominate elections through belly politics?

The avilacamachismo gringo only fulfills its historical function: represent the interests of Mister Danger.

In Puebla, its role is known during the revolutionary process, a partner of avilacamachism and a trigger for emigration and poverty that is not part of Civil Society. It is one of the pillars of local authoritarianism and surrounds itself with the conservative groups that refined the harsh lineage that brought the founding leader. It made room for morenovallismo and tried to promote it as one of the national alternatives. It completed the political alternation in the entity but it used the transfuguismo to the maximum. It is the space from which mainly the paintings that Morena is integrating come out.

The avilacamachismo revolutionary maintains the cacique corporate structure of the old official party; however, he is aware that absolute victories will not come back. It also builds bridges with Morena and many of its leaders zigzag with electoral structures sold to the highest bidder. Now that the polarization of the last electoral contest seems to have ended, it initiates a transfer of cliques similar to a derby that disappoints. The party that wins the elections has the right to form a plural government with elements of diverse political affiliation; However, an electoral contest supposes a dialectic of governance models and public policies. Elections where the options imply ratification are a fraud, a simulation of those that were abundant in Mexico and Puebla. What does Morena offer now for Puebla? What is your difference with the Neoavilacamachismo that was tried to forge from the PAN?

Political parties must seek their ideological and militant definition. If the turncoat party continues unchecked, the institutes end up approved and subtract greater sovereignty to the town and its citizens. There is still time for the political alternation in Puebla to take place and, finally, to skip the authoritarian and oligarchic stage that distinguishes it.