Donald Trump. TACO with rich pollo or big chicken
Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero
Now then? Apparently, the impulsive Trump seems determined to invade Mexico to stop not only drug trafficking but also the decline of his electoral standing in the American public opinion.
However, his idea has been taken up by the Morena narrative to unite the country and generate the historic anti-Yankee Mexican nationalism.
In the dizzying scenario of binational politics, the apparent threat of a military invasion of Mexico, outlined by the impulsive Donald Trump, has taken on a double life.
It's complicated for everyone, especially for the societies of both countries; drug use continues to grow indiscriminately in North America at the same time as violence in Mexico.
No government seems to take the externalities of the drug phenomenon seriously.
The relationship between Mexico and the United States must be reconsidered from the geopolitics of the Brzezinski Model. Of course the United States needs a Japan downstream of the Rio Grande! Mexico cannot continue to be the laboratory of violence for North America, nor the purgatory of the American dream.
If Mexico falls, the United States falls as well; Mexico is a huge flank for destruction and the worst tragedies in the Yankee Empire. There are the scientific prospects of Friedman, Fukuyama, and Zakaria. Have Mister Carrot and his assistant secretary, Pretty Fly Blondie, read them?
The MAGA project is increasingly descending into absurdity and seems to aim for the opposite of hegemony and strengthening. Has Donald Trump become Mexicanized? The United States has all the capacity, energy, and strength to end the drug phenomenon; at least from the perspective of drug consumption and production, to regulate it in a sensible way.
However, excessive pentagonism requires Mexico to be the North American Sicily and the Petty Cash Box of the Narco-Empire.
Can Trump control American pentagonism? It seems not.
Irresponsible incursions into Latin America have only meant increased levels of emigration and drug trafficking for the United States. If Trumpism acts wrongly, it will only exponentially complicate a relationship that is becoming virulent and conflictive.
The idea of North America is irreversible in the immediate geopolitical vision (2080). The question is whether the United States wants to be the protagonist of the new bloc to restore Western culture, or whether it will witness the dismantling of the American Union in the nine nations that will easily succumb to Asian, Chinese, or Muslim culture.
How long will Trumpism govern seriously?
