The Embassy of Treason

 The Embassy of Treason

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

Someone who does not know the reality of the United States Embassy in Mexico is something worse than naïve. Information about drug trafficking in Mexico is provided there all the time, anonymously or indirectly through testimonials. Thousands of complaints in a few months can be observed, thousands of data regarding different criminals who operate in our country and move to the United States. Hundreds of facts about businesses, characters, secret activities. What is the North American embassy doing with so much data? Nothing. Although the US government is aware of the links between the Mexican political class and different traffickers – national and international – the US government does nothing to protect its population. From the outside he betrays them. Drug traffickers and their relatives are the first to receive visas. As with terrorism, the closest familiar figures of international fanaticism can enter the United States without much problem. An example? The attacks of September 11, 2001.

How long will Mexican drug trafficking continue to be the lesser evil of United States geopolitics? The US government's attempts to tarnish the image of Mexican rulers are ridiculous. Since the time of General Plutarco Elías Calles, characters like Abelardo Rodríguez were functional to the informal economy of North America. Does anyone remember the strange relationship between Maximino Ávila Camacho and William Jenkins? From the United States Embassy only memoranda come out to assassinate presidents like Francisco I. Madero, Colosio?, Torrijos?, Gaytán, Galán, Villavicencio? If the United States is concerned about the issue of drug trafficking, why doesn't it put an end to drug traffickers inside and outside its country?

Manola Álvarez Sepúlveda's book on the Green Plan shows us the traditional role of the United States in Mexico; In addition to marijuana and all natural resources, they want the soul and essence of Mexicans. Noam Chomsky, Manuel Buendía and Friederich Katz have told us this.

Who is more deluded? The one who considers the cryptic messages from the United States against AMLO to be true or the one who assumes every action by North America against Mexico is imperialism? The United States has always threatened the Mexican rulers with links to drug trafficking and all this only serves to make Carlos Loret de Mola's father write his pornopolitical novels. Everything negative about Mexico is functional for the North American informal economy.

One thing is certain about democratic theory, if Mexico were a democracy, at least like Canada's, the North American Embassy would not be dedicated to sabotaging the governance of our country for the benefit of the United States. But the Yankee Empire is the one that has been most interested in Mexican democracy failing, now and they have always promoted the enemies of society: the technocrats, the INE, the extreme right, the mercenaries, the paramilitaries, the civil society of Miami-Gilmore , a part of the business oligarchy, etc. Why would the United States need another Japan down the Rio Grande, thought Zbigniew Brzezinsky, and Carlos Salinas wanted to make Mexico that Japan!

The attacks on the president of Mexico only confirm the interventionist imperialism and terrorist cynicism of the Yankee Narco-Empire. The United States can end the drug trafficking whenever it wants, the problem - for Mexico - is that it does not want to, that the United States needs all the drugs in the world to maintain the hysterical materialism of its geopolitical economy. Even the United States could advance George Friedman's scenarios to avoid the triumph of Mexican-American narcopolitics within itself; But, he doesn't want it either. Before going to the Moon, Mars or going to the bottom of the earth or sea, the Nazi WASP elite in the United States still requires neo-extractivism to finish accumulating the financial resources for its final survival. Only in a world full of chaos, disasters and shortages, can Mexican-American narcopolitics imagine having geopolitical control. Mexico is the training ground for the final destiny of humanity that the United States has designed.

Only a profound ignorance of the Yankee Empire or enormous mercenary commitments require the defense of its media. History is the field of experimentation of social sciences and it is only known that if divine justice and hell existed, North America would have to be there forever; However, God is PRI and Pro-Yankee. There is no hell where the United States fits. No way. Humanity will have to wait for other deities to appeal to historical justice and final judgment on the United States. Meanwhile, let your embassy and your media continue to betray the American population and violate foreign countries.

The muscle of the extreme right against AMLO

 The muscle of the extreme right against AMLO

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

The campaign for the presidency of Mexico will not be a sunny day and the middle class constitutes a participatory agent of the streets that can make a pilgrimage to the right

A question echoed in the narrative of various political analysts after the visits of Xóchitl Gálvez and Claudia Sheinbaum with Mario Bergoglio, as well as the March in Defense of Democracy: How many divisions does the Pope have? How strong does the Holy See have?

The electoral campaign in Mexico has begun and the competing groups are beginning to manifest their power.

After the failure of Eduardo Verástegui and the search for the independent candidacy, the Mexican extreme right seems to clear up the accusation of infiltration and make evident the capacity to convene in the configuration of the political class that will occupy the presidency of the republic in the next six-year term.

Although the allegations about a progressive ecofeminist regime remain anecdotal, the truth is that a tandem of businessmen, intellectuals, civil servants, opinion leaders, religious people and various urban middle classes; They are dissatisfied with the “strange” project proposed by the Fourth Transformation in the person of Claudia Sheinbaum.

The call in multiple cities in the country and some important points abroad was no less.

Civil Society, Dresser's middle-class Frodo, is fighting for the institutionality of a dimension of private law, the rationalist autonomy of a part of the public sector, the market and the incursion into the Western world.

The vision of the protesters in the marches called by the extreme right implies the adoption of a civic electoral modernizing path.

When talking about conservative and right-wing groups, this fact constitutes a quantum leap.

Catholic nationalism is shocked by democracy; However, he seems to understand the inevitability of open societies for the survival of all.

The impact of the various pink demonstrations by the INE and Democracy must be acknowledged in Morena.

The campaign for the presidency of Mexico will not be a sunny day and the middle class constitutes a participatory agent of the streets that can make a pilgrimage to the right because the conservative revolutionary nationalism and the pragmatism of Morena, increasingly detaches itself from a Mexican path towards North American modernity.

The middle classes go with the right not only because of aspirationism but because of the Morenoist incomprehension of legitimacy in modern urban times.

Denying the importance of the pink demonstrations and discrediting the clean message of honest actors can reduce the electoral quota that the Fourth Transformation hopes to obtain.

Faced with a scenario of divided government, the understanding of governability must involve the entire country. Mexico is everyone's game.

Xochitl Gálvez and Intermarium

 Xóchitl Gálvez and Intermarium

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

Foreign contacts are significantly harming his campaign because it harms the internal possibilities of his political work and repeats the mistakes of a pro-American, conservative and oligarchic right.

The Frente Amplio candidate will complete a stage abroad of her political promotion to the presidency of Mexico. Xóchitl's visit to the United States, Spain and the Vatican; It is linked to the devices of anti-communism and anti-Russianism that constituted the North American imperialist geopolitics of the Cold War.

The Frente Amplio has discovered its links with US intelligence and White House financing ready to avert any communist and Russian intervention in Latin America.

However, in the face of the current crisis of neoliberal democracy and globalization, what sense does it make to bet on a strategy that has been emptied of content?

Xóchitl Gálvez has all the social and personal profile to compete against the populist narrative of the Fourth Transformation and Andrés Manuel López Obrador.

Foreign contacts are significantly harming her campaign because they undermine the internal possibilities of her political work and repeat the mistakes of a pro-American, conservative and oligarchic right.

It may be understandable that the Frente Amplio seeks the support of the “Deep State” to maintain the imperialist hegemony of the United States; But, in the face of the crisis of globalization and the emergence of nationalism, insisting on the protection of neoliberals and globalists results in fueling contradictions that will mean a considerable decrease in their electoral support.

After the global crisis of Covid-19 and the 2030 Agenda, who wants the United States to remain the global superpower? Even Donald Trump seeks a better understanding of the United States with China and Russia.

Republicans are rethinking the geopolitics of the Cold War because they understand that Western civilization must regenerate its values and find new paths in understanding with the world.

Xóchitl Gálvez's visits abroad harm his political campaign, contradict everything he intends to build in Mexico and bring to light the true interests of the inner circle of FAM XX.

Neoliberalism has failed miserably for everyone, a new stage in world history is approaching that forces us to rethink many things.

Mexico and the United States cannot continue on the traditional course of their relationship without noticing the serious changes in the world.

For almost seventy years, the anti-communism and capitalism of the Intermarium were determining factors in the definition of the Mexican president; but, that has failed.

Mexico's independence regains meaning in a moment of orphanhood in the face of North America.

If Donald Trump wins in the next US elections, neither FAM XX nor Morena will be considered allies by an extremist conservative who will promote more than radical changes for Mexico.

Trump is the real danger for the country and that forces us to look for new geopolitical relationships and protect Mexicanness from a terrifying time that is coming.

2024 and Narcopolitics

 2024 and Narcopolitics

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

Moises Naim and Carlos Fazio agree that global society is in the middle of a war between factual powers of various kinds. The Cornwall Consensus and the Davos 2030 Agenda constitute timid approaches to restructuring the political sphere in the face of the subjugation of the market that puts the human race on the brink of extinction. Multiple formats of formal and informal economy are dominating all aspects of life; But, nevertheless, the defense of politics and the institutionalization of the State are essential for humanity to survive.

Drug trafficking is one of the main global economic activities. In Mexico it is even considered one of the largest employers, in addition to preventing the marginalization of its members in all aspects. The empowerment of drug trafficking in our country seems to have no limits.

It is undeniable that Mexico is a Narco-Society, but it is at the service of the Narco-Empire called the United States. Mexico has been configured as the Sicily of the United States since World War II because the pentagonist military industrial complex is subsidized by Latin American drug trafficking. The main promoter of the drug economy is the United States.

Ronald Reagan and Oliver North are reproduced in each Mexican six-year term, at each of its levels of government. However, each nation's ability to better address the problem depends on internal strength.

The United States does little, almost nothing, to prevent the transfer of drugs and their consumption in its society. The Yankee empire is capable of bombing a country where some American soldiers were victims of terrorism, but it does nothing against those who poison its youth - by the millions - from within and even from its neighbors.

Mexican drug trafficking cells have migrated to the southern United States and coexist with North American authorities and taxpayers. The White House neither sees them, nor hears them, nor does anything to them; as well as the bizarre ones of Donald Trump, Abbot or Di Santis.

American political processes are marked by drugs more than any other country. What does the United States do when its government agencies handle the movement of drugs in various parts of the world? Nothing, who certifies the United States in its fight against addictions or drug control? Nobody. Thousands of books, reports and scientific reports confirm the evidence of the political links with organized crime of the North American government.

Mexico is experiencing a low-intensity war by the State against the Drug Cartels financed by North America and another one superimposed on the competition for the market by the same protagonists of drug trafficking. How long will the US government and its political class be serious about drugs?

Trumpism in the succession agenda of the Mexican presidency

 Trumpism in the succession agenda of the Mexican presidency

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

Masses have begun to take place in the Mexican Catholic rite so that the Republican candidate for the presidency of the United States of America does not come to power. A large part of the regions that send migrants in our country and Latin America observe with concern the nationalist and conservative discourse of the Republicans who talk about closing the doors of North America in every sense. How serious is Trumpist rhetoric as a government project for the future of Mexico?

During the presidency of Enrique Peña Nieto, the government decided to anticipate the scenario of Republican victory and summon the US presidential candidate to generate some type of agreement that would guarantee peace and non-aggression against our country which, according to the current narrative of the Republicans, only He deserves the atomic bomb. Things weren't so bad for Mexico after all, the republic could have suffered a fate like Ukraine and it didn't happen. Now Donald Trump returns to the fray and public opinion in the United States demands true paths for the proposal to enlarge the Yankee Empire. The WASP status quo is taking the Hispanic challenge as a serious risk.

Despite Peña Nieto's terrible mistakes, his decision was the right one to make peace with Donald Trump. What are the different political forces doing now? Outside of the late Eduardo Verástegui, no one takes seriously that Trump is in the anteroom of the White House and with thousands of horsepower behind him.

Republicans and the public opinion that favors them think that the time has come for radical measures against Mexico - and they are not wrong - on the issues of trade, migration, drug trafficking and geopolitical security. A Morenista legislative majority will be of little or no use if the United States decides to invade Mexico.

The candidates for the presidency of the Mexican Republic have not considered how our country will face the review of the USMCA, the probable return of millions of illegal immigrants, the bombing of areas identified with drug cartels, the actual construction of the border wall and the way in which the civilian population will be protected in a scenario of military conflict. Why doesn't the INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral) invite Donald Trump's candidates to debate?

Mexico's enemy is not AMLO or FAMXX, once again one of the most important risks for today's Mexico arises in the overloaded Donald Trump. We do not have the military and political capacity to confront a war with the United States; guerrilla warfare would prolong complete and contagious ungovernability even for imperialism; but Republicans want to take the risk. It is essential that Mexico knows the future president of the United States better and needs to act preventively to avoid greater risks. Trump has expressed admiration for Vladimir Putin and his peculiar way of resolving geopolitics. The analogy between Ukraine and Mexico is compelling. The political parties in dispute for the presidency of Mexico must dialogue with Donald Trump before experiencing the persecution of Volodomir Zelenski.

The EZLN and the persistence of Deep Mexico

 The EZLN and the persistence of Deep Mexico

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

The appearance of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation meant the cancellation of the candidacy of Luis Donaldo Colosio. In one way or another, the guerrilla hurts political candidates because it delegitimizes participation through the institutional means of political struggle and only grants guarantees to the armed means.

Mexico is a country of painful, long-standing inequalities that urgently need to be resolved. The continuation of guerrillas like the EZLN is indicative that the needs of deep Mexico have not been met and, after resorting to all types of means to achieve their attention, the use of weapons to project their demands is considered necessary; Hence, the criticisms of the head of the federal Executive against the EZLN were incomprehensible. Unlike the Mexican narcoterrorists, the Zapatista guerrilla does not have the arsenal to exert violence on a disproportionate scale; On the other hand, the EZLN has been confronted and attacked as the strongest cartel in the country. It's not fair.

The EZLN appeared at a time when Mexican integration with North America seemed logical and immediate. Zapatismo, in these circumstances, has been Cleopatra's nose in Mexican history; More than a hindrance, it is a human and social actor that comes to settle accounts of the past and oblivion and invites us to raise awareness about the path that the Mexican political system has taken.

Indigenous people continue to be the most discriminated against and marginalized social stratum in the country. Mexico remains as it was in the time of Bartolomé de las Casas and the country is not capable of incorporating the original communities. The damage is enormous over time and the reasons are not understood. The storm guerrillas continue to appear to tell us that something is missing in Mexico, that we are not complete on the journey.

The search for effective public policies and an equitable legal framework are also debts of the Fourth Transformation with the indigenous communities, especially when being Mexican constituted one of the main focuses of attention of the current government.

The War on Drug Trafficking as a long duration

 The War on Drug Trafficking as a long duration

Diego Martín Velázquez Caballero

The extensive combat against groups dedicated to drug trafficking in Latin America seems to become the new hegemonic strategy of the United States. What happened in Ecuador and the response of the authorities to a problem of such magnitude show the way in which capitalism devastates the State. The idea that narco-societies can only be combated through the use of the armed forces and an increase in the security budget is not so wrong from certain perspectives. The problem arises when we talk about longer wars and the development of prison complexes and security technologies where criminals will live much better than the people. The joke of school and prison has been overcome by the Ecuadorian president, in a state of war he thinks about building Elysium for drug traffickers.

The president of Ecuador attempted to respond like Felipe Calderón Hinojosa to a situation of terrorist drug trafficking; However, he went ahead to show off the corruption, patrimonialism and social precariousness that Plan Colombia or Mérida means. The War on Drug Trafficking has failed because it went on longer than it should have and because the armed forces are sent to fight with their hands tied while the political class is dedicated to looting and colluding with the mafias.

The war on drug trafficking has been a far-reaching policy that the United States promotes; However, according to the advertising that the Ecuadorian government has established, it can be seen that those who benefit are the North American construction companies and arms industries; that is, pentagonism. Mexico and Colombia can give clear examples of the failure of this policy; more than two decades in combat have left such a number of deaths and violence that the results are genocide and Failed States. The war against drug trafficking is the new counterinsurgency strategy of the United States against Latin America. Committing Latin American governments to these failed wars implies encouraging the abandonment of social issues and the promotion of underdevelopment. Although some businessmen consider that war is the right time for business, in the long term everyone loses, just look at how many have to pay property rights and must abandon their businesses for the washing machines of drug trafficking.

We must remember the degree of perversion of the Mérida Initiative, Plan Colombia and narcoterrorism. Drug trafficking is followed by money laundering, drug exploitation, neo-extractivism and all types of criminal activities. Who benefits from putting a country at war? While the president of Ecuador, like Calderón Hinojosa, think of militarization as the acquisition of toys and prisons as science fiction architectural designs, the people must think about migrating to the United States or prepare for an unimaginable escalation of violence; of which Ecuador has given signs.

The American narco-empire and mafia states are what make the ideal combination for Latin American colonialism: forced displacement, poverty, migration, neo-extractivism and corrupting patrimonialism; They constitute a social cycle that makes the narcoeconomy functional for the United States. North America has the capacity to destroy drug traffickers if it really wanted to end the problem; The point is that the main Drug Cartel is the Americans.

The more drug power advances, the more inefficient the State becomes. Federico Campbell talks about the Sicilianization of society and the necrosis of the State in Mexico, it is more than regrettable to glimpse this future for all of Latin America. No government finds a way to save its country from this fate and American drug addiction seems endless.

Only the full and courageous legalization of drugs will allow Latin America to escape this spiral of violence and poverty. If the United States wants to put an end to drug trafficking, let them come to fight drug traffickers or establish health measures for their population. The war on drugs is lost from the beginning and the one who loses the most is society.